Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Dec;63(12):1605–1610. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019224

Health status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison with the general population

H Dagfinrud 1, A Mengshoel 1, K Hagen 1, J Loge 1, T Kvien 1
PMCID: PMC1754848  PMID: 15547084

Abstract

Objective: To examine the subjective health in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with the general population, and to explore the associations between health status and age, sex of the patients, and educational level in AS.

Methods: Health status was assessed with a generic instrument (SF-36) in 314 patients with AS and in 2323 people from the general population. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, and educational level. Standard difference scores (s-scores) were calculated to ensure the clinical meaningfulness of the norm based comparisons.

Results: Both men and women with AS reported significantly impaired health on all scales of the SF-36. Women reported significantly worse health on physical health domains. However, when calculating differences from the general population, numerically larger s-scores were found for men (except for physical role and vitality). The relative impact of AS seems to diminish with increasing age. In AS, better health was significantly associated with higher education across all scales. Deviations from the general population on the non-physical health aspects were especially pronounced in patients with low education.

Conclusions: All key dimensions of health are affected by AS. The physical aspects seem to be most severely affected, but in the less educated group of patients, the disease impact on the mental health aspects was also considerable. Evaluation and management planning should take the complexity of AS into consideration. The focus on physical function should be maintained, and additional attention should be paid to the mental and social consequences of AS.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.3 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Standard difference scores (s-scores) for female and male patients with AS (calculation of s-scores was based on the separate male and female general population values).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 Standard difference scores (s-scores) for age groups of female (A) and male (B) patients with AS (calculation of s-scores was based on the values of separate general population age and gender groups).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

 Standard difference scores (s-scores) for high and low education groups of patients with AS (calculation of s-scores was based on the values of separate high and low education groups of the general population).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amor B., Santos R. S., Nahal R., Listrat V., Dougados M. Predictive factors for the longterm outcome of spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1994 Oct;21(10):1883–1887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariza-Ariza Rafael, Hernández-Cruz Blanca, Navarro-Sarabia Federico. Physical function and health-related quality of life of Spanish patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Aug 15;49(4):483–487. doi: 10.1002/art.11197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandt J., Khariouzov A., Listing J., Haibel H., Sörensen H., Grassnickel L., Rudwaleit M., Sieper J., Braun J. Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun;48(6):1667–1675. doi: 10.1002/art.11017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun Juergen, Brandt Jan, Listing Joachim, Rudwaleit Martin, Sieper Joachim. Biologic therapies in the spondyloarthritis: new opportunities, new challenges. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;15(4):394–407. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200307000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braunstein E. M., Martel W., Moidel R. Ankylosing spondylitis in men and women: a clinical and radiographic comparison. Radiology. 1982 Jul;144(1):91–94. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.1.7089271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calin A., Garrett S., Whitelock H., Kennedy L. G., O'Hea J., Mallorie P., Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281–2285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carette S., Graham D., Little H., Rubenstein J., Rosen P. The natural disease course of ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Feb;26(2):186–190. doi: 10.1002/art.1780260210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerrahoglu L., Unlu Z., Can M., Goktan C., Celik P. Lumbar stiffness but not thoracic radiographic changes relate to alteration of lung function tests in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Aug;21(4):275–279. doi: 10.1007/s100670200073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dougados M., Revel M., Khan M. A. Spondylarthropathy treatment: progress in medical treatment, physical therapy and rehabilitation. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;12(4):717–736. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(98)80046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doward L. C., Spoorenberg A., Cook S. A., Whalley D., Helliwell P. S., Kay L. J., McKenna S. P., Tennant A., van der Heijde D., Chamberlain M. A. Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jan;62(1):20–26. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eustace S., Coughlan R. J., McCarthy C. Ankylosing spondylitis. A comparison of clinical and radiographic features in men and women. Ir Med J. 1993 Jul-Aug;86(4):120–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garrett S., Jenkinson T., Kennedy L. G., Whitelock H., Gaisford P., Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286–2291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gran J. T., Husby G. Ankylosing spondylitis in women. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Apr;19(5):303–312. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90053-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gran J. T., Husby G. Clinical, epidemiologic, and therapeutic aspects of ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1998 Jul;10(4):292–298. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199807000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gran J. T., Husby G. The epidemiology of ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Apr;22(5):319–334. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(05)80011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guyatt G. H., Feeny D. H., Patrick D. L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622–629. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hagen K. B., Smedstad L. M., Uhlig T., Kvien T. K. The responsiveness of health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of disease-specific and generic instruments. J Rheumatol. 1999 Jul;26(7):1474–1480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hays Ron D., Hahn Harlan, Marshall Grant. Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12 Suppl 2):S4–S9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.36837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jenkinson T. R., Mallorie P. A., Whitelock H. C., Kennedy L. G., Garrett S. L., Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Sep;21(9):1694–1698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiménez-Balderas F. J., Mintz G. Ankylosing spondylitis: clinical course in women and men. J Rheumatol. 1993 Dec;20(12):2069–2072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones S. D., Steiner A., Garrett S. L., Calin A. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jan;35(1):66–71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kidd B., Mullee M., Frank A., Cawley M. Disease expression of ankylosing spondylitis in males and females. J Rheumatol. 1988 Sep;15(9):1407–1409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kvien T. K., Kaasa S., Smedstad L. M. Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. II. A comparison of the SF-36 with disease-specific measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1077–1086. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kvien T. K., Kaasa S., Smedstad L. M. Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. II. A comparison of the SF-36 with disease-specific measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1077–1086. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee H. S., Kim T. H., Yun H. R., Park Y. W., Jung S. S., Bae S. C., Joo K. B., Kim S. Y. Radiologic changes of cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(4):262–266. doi: 10.1007/s100670170041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Loge J. H., Abrahamsen A. F., Ekeberg O., Kaasa S. Reduced health-related quality of life among Hodgkin's disease survivors: a comparative study with general population norms. Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):71–77. doi: 10.1023/a:1008315525997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Loge J. H., Kaasa S. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med. 1998 Dec;26(4):250–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Marshall R. W., Kirwan J. R. Methotrexate in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2001;30(6):313–314. doi: 10.1080/030097401317148480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moll J. M. New criteria for the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;65:12–24. doi: 10.3109/03009748709102173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Suarez-Almazor M. E., Kendall C., Johnson J. A., Skeith K., Vincent D. Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000 Jul;39(7):783–790. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ward M. M. Health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: a survey of 175 patients. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Aug;12(4):247–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ware J. E., Jr Using generic measures of functional health and well-being to increase understanding of disease burden. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Jun 15;25(12):1467–1467. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Will R., Edmunds L., Elswood J., Calin A. Is there sexual inequality in ankylosing spondylitis? A study of 498 women and 1202 men. J Rheumatol. 1990 Dec;17(12):1649–1652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van der Heijde D., Bellamy N., Calin A., Dougados M., Khan M. A., van der Linden S. Preliminary core sets for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group. J Rheumatol. 1997 Nov;24(11):2225–2229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van der Heijde D., Calin A., Dougados M., Khan M. A., van der Linden S., Bellamy N. Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy, and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis. Progress report of the ASAS Working Group. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):951–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van der Heijde D., van der Linden S., Bellamy N., Calin A., Dougados M., Khan M. A. Which domains should be included in a core set for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis? Introduction to the ankylosing spondylitis module of OMERACT IV. J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):945–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van der Linden S., van der Heijde D. Ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical features. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1998 Nov;24(4):663-76, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES