Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Apr;63(4):360–368. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011601

Inpatient rehabilitation for hip or knee osteoarthritis: 2 year follow up study

M Weigl 1, F Angst 1, G Stucki 1, S Lehmann 1, A Aeschlimann 1
PMCID: PMC1754958  PMID: 15020328

Abstract

Objective: To examine the course of pain, physical function, and other health dimensions after a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation intervention in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee.

Methods: An observational, prospective cohort study with assessments at baseline (entry into clinic), 1 (discharge from inpatient rehabilitation), 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after baseline. Consecutively referred patients to an inpatient rehabilitation centre fulfilling the inclusion criteria were studied. 3–4 week comprehensive rehabilitation intervention, including strengthening exercise, flexibility training, endurance training, relaxation strategies, and consultations for preventive measures, was carried out. Individual home rehabilitation programmes were taught. Generic health status was measured using the SF-36, condition specific health was measured with the WOMAC questionnaire. Effects were analysed with sensitivity statistics (effect size, ES) and non-parametric tests.

Results: Data from 128 patients with complete follow up data were analysed. Both pain and physical function improved moderately (WOMAC pain: ES = 0.56, WOMAC function ES = 0.44) until discharge. Although the effect in pain reduction remained significant by month 24 (WOMAC: ES = 0.26), physical function deteriorated close to baseline values after 12 months.

Conclusions: Comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation of patients with OA of the hip or knee may improve pain and physical function in the mid-term, and pain in the long term.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (489.9 KB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Global health status of patients with hip and knee OA by the SF-36 scales at baseline and at discharge (n = 128). Baseline = entry into the clinic. Discharge of the clinic = about 1 month after baseline. A larger "spider" figure represents a better health status. 0 = worst health; 100 = best health.

Figure 2 .

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A 2 year follow up of patients with hip and knee OA by WOMAC scales (n = 128). Patients were assessed with the WOMAC at baseline ( = entry into the clinic), at discharge (1 ?month after baseline), and at months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24. 0 = no symptoms; 10 = maximal symptoms.

Figure 3 .

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A 2 year follow up of patients with hip and knee OA by the SF-36 scales for physical health (n = 128). The times of assessment are listed in the legend to fig 2. 0 = worst health; 100 = best health.

Figure 4 .

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A 2 year follow up of patients with hip and knee OA by the SF-36 scales for mental health (n = 128). The times of assessment are listed in the legend to fig 2. 0 = worst health; 100 = best health. The intake of NSAIDs or analgesics or both declined from 66.4% at baseline to 11.0% at the end of rehabilitation. Until month 12 the level of the intake of drugs climbed to the baseline values (67.2%) and did not change significantly until month 24 (63.3%).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman R., Alarcón G., Appelrouth D., Bloch D., Borenstein D., Brandt K., Brown C., Cooke T. D., Daniel W., Feldman D. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505–514. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman R., Asch E., Bloch D., Bole G., Borenstein D., Brandt K., Christy W., Cooke T. D., Greenwald R., Hochberg M. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. G., Wixson R. L., Tsai D., Stulberg S. D., Chang R. W. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Oct;11(7):831–840. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80183-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angst F., Aeschlimann A., Steiner W., Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Sep;60(9):834–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Angst F., Aeschlimann A., Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):384–391. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angst Felix, Aeschlimann André, Michel Beat A., Stucki Gerold. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. J Rheumatol. 2002 Jan;29(1):131–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bellamy N., Buchanan W. W., Chalmers A., Ford P. M., Kean W. F., Kraag G. R., Gerecz-Simon E., Campbell J. A multicenter study of tenoxicam and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;20(6):999–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bellamy N., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C. H., Campbell J., Stitt L. W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833–1840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellamy N., Kean W. F., Buchanan W. W., Gerecz-Simon E., Campbell J. Double blind randomized controlled trial of sodium meclofenamate (Meclomen) and diclofenac sodium (Voltaren): post validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol. 1992 Jan;19(1):153–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bellamy N., Kirwan J., Boers M., Brooks P., Strand V., Tugwell P., Altman R., Brandt K., Dougados M., Lequesne M. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):799–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1359–1366. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00115-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coyte P. C., Hawker G., Croxford R., Wright J. G. Rates of revision knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun;81(6):773–782. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199906000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deyle G. D., Henderson N. E., Matekel R. L., Ryder M. G., Garber M. B., Allison S. C. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise in osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Feb 1;132(3):173–181. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-3-200002010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dieppe P., Cushnaghan J., Jasani M. K., McCrae F., Watt I. A two-year, placebo-controlled trial of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Jul;32(7):595–600. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.7.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ettinger W. H., Jr, Burns R., Messier S. P., Applegate W., Rejeski W. J., Morgan T., Shumaker S., Berry M. J., O'Toole M., Monu J. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). JAMA. 1997 Jan 1;277(1):25–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher N. M., Gresham G. E., Abrams M., Hicks J., Horrigan D., Pendergast D. R. Quantitative effects of physical therapy on muscular and functional performance in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):840–847. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fortin Paul R., Penrod John R., Clarke Ann E., St-Pierre Yvan, Joseph Lawrence, Bélisle Patrick, Liang Matthew H., Ferland Diane, Phillips Charlotte B., Mahomed Nizar. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Dec;46(12):3327–3330. doi: 10.1002/art.10631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hochberg M. C., Altman R. D., Brandt K. D., Clark B. M., Dieppe P. A., Griffin M. R., Moskowitz R. W., Schnitzer T. J. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part I. Osteoarthritis of the hip. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Nov;38(11):1535–1540. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hochberg M. C., Altman R. D., Brandt K. D., Clark B. M., Dieppe P. A., Griffin M. R., Moskowitz R. W., Schnitzer T. J. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Nov;38(11):1541–1546. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kantz M. E., Harris W. J., Levitsky K., Ware J. E., Jr, Davies A. R. Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS240–MS252. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kazis L. E., Anderson J. J., Meenan R. F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178–S189. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lawrence R. C., Hochberg M. C., Kelsey J. L., McDuffie F. C., Medsger T. A., Jr, Felts W. R., Shulman L. E. Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. J Rheumatol. 1989 Apr;16(4):427–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maurer B. T., Stern A. G., Kinossian B., Cook K. D., Schumacher H. R., Jr Osteoarthritis of the knee: isokinetic quadriceps exercise versus an educational intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Oct;80(10):1293–1299. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90032-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murray C. J., Lopez A. D. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997 May 24;349(9064):1498–1504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nilsdotter A. K., Aurell Y., Siösteen A. K., Lohmander L. S., Roos H. P. Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Mar;60(3):228–232. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.3.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Parent Eric, Moffet Hélène. Preoperative predictors of locomotor ability two months after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb 15;49(1):36–50. doi: 10.1002/art.10906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pendleton A., Arden N., Dougados M., Doherty M., Bannwarth B., Bijlsma J. W., Cluzeau F., Cooper C., Dieppe P. A., Günther K. P. EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Dec;59(12):936–944. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.12.936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rejeski W. J., Brawley L. R., Ettinger W., Morgan T., Thompson C. Compliance to exercise therapy in older participants with knee osteoarthritis: implications for treating disability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Aug;29(8):977–985. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199708000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Salmon P., Hall G. M., Peerbhoy D., Shenkin A., Parker C. Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: Patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):360–366. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Steiner W. A., Fransen J., Stucki G., Aeschlimann A. G. An alternative way to display SF-36 results for individual patients. Phys Ther. 1998 Oct;78(10):1118–1119. doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.10.1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stucki G., Meier D., Stucki S., Michel B. A., Tyndall A. G., Dick W., Theiler R. Evaluation einer deutschen Version des WOMAC (Western Ontario und McMaster Universities) Arthroseindex. Z Rheumatol. 1996 Jan-Feb;55(1):40–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sullivan T., Allegrante J. P., Peterson M. G., Kovar P. A., MacKenzie C. R. One-year followup of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who participated in a program of supervised fitness walking and supportive patient education. Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Aug;11(4):228–233. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Theiler R., Sangha O., Schaeren S., Michel B. A., Tyndall A., Dick W., Stucki G. Superior responsiveness of the pain and function sections of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as compared to the Lequesne-Algofunctional Index in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Nov;7(6):515–519. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ware J. E., Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):903–912. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wright J. G., Young N. L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Mar;50(3):239–246. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00373-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van Baar M. E., Assendelft W. J., Dekker J., Oostendorp R. A., Bijlsma J. W. Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jul;42(7):1361–1369. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1361::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van Baar M. E., Dekker J., Oostendorp R. A., Bijl D., Voorn T. B., Bijlsma J. W. Effectiveness of exercise in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: nine months' follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Dec;60(12):1123–1130. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.12.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. van Baar M. E., Dekker J., Oostendorp R. A., Bijl D., Voorn T. B., Lemmens J. A., Bijlsma J. W. The effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized clinical trial. J Rheumatol. 1998 Dec;25(12):2432–2439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES