Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Jul;63(7):825–830. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.012724

Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need

T Dixon 1, M Shaw 1, S Ebrahim 1, P Dieppe 1
PMCID: PMC1755069  PMID: 15194578

Abstract

Objectives: To examine trends in primary and revision joint (hip and knee) replacement in England between 1991 and 2000.

Methods: Analysis of hospital episodes statistics between 1 April 1991 and 30 March 2001 for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Descriptive statistics and regression modelling were used to summarise patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and to explore variations in joint surgery rates by age, sex, and deprivation.

Results: Between 1991 and 2000, the incidence of primary THR increased by 18%, while the incidence of revision THR more than doubled. The incidence of primary TKR doubled, with revision TKR increasing by 300%. Over the 10 year period, the proportion of THR episodes that involved revision operations rose from 8% to 20%. Substantial variations in operation rates by socioeconomic status were seen, with the most deprived fifth of the population experiencing significantly lower rates. Projections estimate that primary THR numbers could rise by up to 22% by the year 2010, with primary TKR numbers rising by up to 63%.

Conclusions: Provision of joint replacement surgery in English NHS hospitals has increased substantially over the past decade. Revision operations in particular have increased markedly. The growth in primary operations has mostly occurred among those aged 60 years and over; rates among young people have changed very little. There is a significant deprivation based gradient in rates. If current trends continue there would be almost 47 000 primary hip and 54 000 primary knee operations annually by 2010.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.8 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Trends in primary and revision hip replacement rates, 1991–2000, and projections to 2010, by sex. Rates are age standardised to the England mid-year population of 1996. Source: HES, Department of Health.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 Age standardised rates (and 95% confidence intervals) of primary hip replacements by quintile of deprivation index, 2000. Rates are age standardised to the England mid-year population of 1996. Source: HES, Department of Health.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

 Trends in primary and revision knee replacement rates, 1991–2000, and projections to 2010, by sex. Rates are age standardised to the England mid-year population of 1996. Source: HES, Department of Health.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

 Age standardised rates (and 95% confidence intervals) of primary knee replacements by quintile of deprivation index, 2000. Rates are age standardised to the England mid-year population of 1996. Source: HES, Department of Health.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birrell F., Johnell O., Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Sep;58(9):569–572. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.9.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks Peter M. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Sep;14(5):573–577. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200209000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang R. W., Pellisier J. M., Hazen G. B. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA. 1996 Mar 20;275(11):858–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaturvedi N., Ben-Shlomo Y. From the surgery to the surgeon: does deprivation influence consultation and operation rates? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):127–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hajat Shakoor, Fitzpatrick Ray, Morris Richard, Reeves Barnaby, Rigge Marianne, Williams Olwen, Murray David, Gregg Paul. Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jan;7(1):19–25. doi: 10.1258/1355819021927638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Havelin L. I., Engesaeter L. B., Espehaug B., Furnes O., Lie S. A., Vollset S. E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Aug;71(4):337–353. doi: 10.1080/000164700317393321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawker Gillian A., Wright James G., Glazier Richard H., Coyte Peter C., Harvey Bart, Williams J. Ivan, Badley Elizabeth M. The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Dec;46(12):3331–3339. doi: 10.1002/art.10682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herberts P., Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Apr;71(2):111–121. doi: 10.1080/000164700317413067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelly K. D., Voaklander D. C., Johnston D. W., Newman S. C., Suarez-Almazor M. E. Change in pain and function while waiting for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Apr;16(3):351–359. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.21455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ling Shari M., Fried Linda P., Garrett Elizabeth S., Fan Ming-Yu, Rantanen Taina, Bathon Joan M. Knee osteoarthritis compromises early mobility function: The Women's Health and Aging Study II. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jan;30(1):114–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lucht U. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Oct;71(5):433–439. doi: 10.1080/000164700317381081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahomed Nizar N., Barrett Jane A., Katz Jeffrey N., Phillips Charlotte B., Losina Elena, Lew Robert A., Guadagnoli Edward, Harris William H., Poss Robert, Baron John A. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85-A(1):27–32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahon Jeffrey L., Bourne Robert B., Rorabeck Cecil H., Feeny David H., Stitt Larry, Webster-Bogaert Susan. Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. CMAJ. 2002 Nov 12;167(10):1115–1121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McMurray Anne, Grant Sheila, Griffiths Susan, Letford Ali. Health-related quality of life and health service use following total hip replacement surgery. J Adv Nurs. 2002 Dec;40(6):663–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nilsdotter A-K, Lohmander L. S. Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002 Nov;41(11):1261–1267. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.11.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Puolakka T. J., Pajamäki K. J., Halonen P. J., Pulkkinen P. O., Paavolainen P., Nevalainen J. K. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):433–441. doi: 10.1080/000164701753532745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reginster J. Y. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002 Apr;41(Suppl 1):3–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Robertsson O., Dunbar M. J., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Past incidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Aug;71(4):376–380. doi: 10.1080/000164700317393376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):503–513. doi: 10.1080/000164701753532853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walker D. J., Heslop P. S., Chandler C., Pinder I. M. Measured ambulation and self-reported health status following total joint replacement for the osteoarthritic knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002 Jul;41(7):755–758. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.7.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wells V. M., Hearn T. C., McCaul K. A., Anderton S. M., Wigg A. E. R., Graves S. E. Changing incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Apr;17(3):267–273. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.30414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams B., Whatmough P., McGill J., Rushton L. Private funding of elective hospital treatment in England and Wales, 1997-8: national survey. BMJ. 2000 Apr 1;320(7239):904–905. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7239.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES