Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Sep;63(9):1145–1151. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018424

The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs

M Lequesne 1, J Malghem 1, E Dion 1
PMCID: PMC1755132  PMID: 15308525

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the range of normal radiographic joint space width (JSW) values and the shape of the normal hip, and the influence of age, sex, dysplasia, coxa profunda, and acetabular roof curve abnormalities on these values.

Methods: On routine conventional pelvic radiographs taken in the supine position in patients with no history of hip or lumbar pain, JSW was measured at three points (superolateral, apical, superomedial), together with the VCE, HTE, and neck shaft angles; acetabular depth; and femoral head diameter.

Results: 223 radiographs (446 hips) from 127 women and 96 men (mean age 51.3 years) were examined. Interindividual variations in JSW were large (apical site: 4.19 (0.92) mm; range 2–7). Mean JSW values were higher at the superolateral site than at the apical and superomedial sites in nearly 80% of cases. Women had lower JSW values than men. JSW values did not fall with age. Marked right/left JSW asymmetry was seen in 13/221 (5.9%) subjects. Eight cases of acetabular dysplasia (7 unilateral) and 16 cases of coxa profunda were found, but no cases of acetabular protrusion. The JSW was thicker in dysplastic hips, and thinner in hips with coxa profunda. A roof curve abnormality was found in 96/446 (21.5%) hips.

Conclusions: Normal JSW values vary widely; the JSW is commonly narrower at the superomedial site than at the apical site, and is sometimes asymmetric. The roof curve is dysmorphic in about 20% of patients. These findings may have important implications for epidemiological studies and early diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (138.2 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Normal hip joint space. Location of the three sites of JSW measurement. From right to left: the superolateral, the apical, and the superomedial sites (point of arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 (A) The VCE, HTE, and NSA (indicated as CC1D, 140°) angles; (B) acetabular depth: segment "ad" stretches from the deepest point of the acetabulum and the line EP, drawn from the lateral extremity of the acetabular roof to the superior pubic angle.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

 Sketch of the three main types of acetabular roof dysmorphia: (A) excessively arched roof; (B) excessively flat roof; (C) roof with a prominent segment (angular roof).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

 Acetabular roof dysmorphias. The three main types: (A) excessively arched roof: the radius of the curve is smaller than that of the femoral head; (B) excessively flat roof: the radius of the curve is larger than that of the femoral head; (C) angular roof; note the prominent segment in the superolateral part.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

 Cybernetics of the growing cartilage regulating (negative) feedback. The system input is the pressure (in the standing position) exerted on cellular receptors (chondrocytes of the deep layer). These cells build the matrix, which is the outcome. The thicker the matrix (acting as a "cushion"), the lower the pressure exerted on deep chondrocytes. At a certain point, matrix secretion stops through a lack of stimulation. Thus, the higher the pressure (/cm2 in hip dysplasia), the thicker the matrix.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armbuster T. G., Guerra J., Jr, Resnick D., Goergen T. G., Feingold M. L., Niwayama G., Danzig L. A. The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology. 1978 Jul;128(1):1–10. doi: 10.1148/128.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong C. G., Gardner D. L. Thickness and distribution of human femoral head articular cartilage. Changes with age. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Oct;36(5):407–412. doi: 10.1136/ard.36.5.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):744–744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft P., Coggon D., Cruddas M., Cooper C. Osteoarthritis of the hip: an occupational disease in farmers. BMJ. 1992 May 16;304(6837):1269–1272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft P., Cooper C., Wickham C., Coggon D. Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;132(3):514–522. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Delaunay S., Dussault R. G., Kaplan P. A., Alford B. A. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol. 1997 Feb;26(2):75–81. doi: 10.1007/s002560050197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fredensborg N., Nilsson B. E. The joint space in normal hip radiographs. Radiology. 1978 Feb;126(2):325–326. doi: 10.1148/126.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goker B., Sancak A., Arac M., Shott S., Block J. A. The radiographic joint space width in clinically normal hips: effects of age, gender and physical parameters. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 May;11(5):328–334. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart D. J., Spector T. D. Radiographic criteria for epidemiologic studies of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1995 Feb;43:46–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoue H., Ohmori K., Miyasaka K., Hosoe H. Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height. Skeletal Radiol. 1999 Nov;28(11):638–643. doi: 10.1007/s002560050566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lanyon Peter, Muir Kenneth, Doherty Sally, Doherty Michael. Age and sex differences in hip joint space among asymptomatic subjects without structural change: implications for epidemiologic studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;48(4):1041–1046. doi: 10.1002/art.10886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lequesne M. G., Laredo J. D. The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Nov;57(11):676–681. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.11.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lequesne M. G., Maheu E. Methodology of clinical trials in hand osteoarthritis: conventional and proposed tools. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2000;8 (Suppl A):S64–S69. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lequesne Michel, Morvan Gérard. Description of the potential of an arthrometer for standard and reduced radiographs suitable to measurement of angles and segments of hip, knee, foot and joint space widths. Joint Bone Spine. 2002 May;69(3):282–292. doi: 10.1016/s1297-319x(02)00372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindberg H., Danielsson L. G. The relation between labor and coxarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Dec;(191):159–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maetzel A., Mäkelä M., Hawker G., Bombardier C. Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee and mechanical occupational exposure--a systematic overview of the evidence. J Rheumatol. 1997 Aug;24(8):1599–1607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Murray R. O. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol. 1965 Nov;38(455):810–824. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-38-455-810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pogrund H., Bloom R., Mogle P. The normal width of the adult hip joint: the relationship to age, sex, and obesity. Skeletal Radiol. 1983;10(1):10–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00355383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reis P., Nahal-Said R., Ravaud P., Dougados M., Amor B. Are radiological joint space widths of normal hips asymmetrical? Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Apr;58(4):246–249. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.4.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roach K. E., Persky V., Miles T., Budiman-Mak E. Biomechanical aspects of occupation and osteoarthritis of the hip: a case-control study. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2334–2340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thelin A., Jansson B., Jacobsson B., Ström H. Coxarthrosis and farm work: a case-referent study. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Nov;32(5):497–501. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199711)32:5<497::aid-ajim9>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES