Skip to main content
PMC home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1997 Sep;65(9):3693–3700. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.9.3693-3700.1997

Pathogenicity of three strains of Serpulina pilosicoli in pigs with a naturally acquired intestinal flora.

J R Thomson 1, W J Smith 1, B P Murray 1, S McOrist 1
PMCID: PMC175526  PMID: 9284139

Abstract

Serpulina pilosicoli is an anaerobic spirochete which has been isolated from the colons of pigs with enteric disease. The clinical and pathologic features of experimental infections of conventional pigs (born by normal farrowing with a naturally acquired intestinal flora) with three strains of S. pilosicoli were determined in order to confirm the enteropathogenicity of this species. Strains were derived from the colons of British pigs with colitis and passaged 8 to 10 times during expansion and purification in vitro. Eighteen ten-week-old Large White-Landrace cross pigs were each inoculated once orally with 0.7 x 10(9) to 1.6 x 10(9) of one of three strains of S. pilosicoli. Six pigs were challenged with each strain. Control pigs were dosed with uninfected broth medium or with 1.8 x 10(7) cells of the nonpathogenic Serpulina innocens. Eight pigs (two to four per S. pilosicoli challenge group) developed soft or diarrheic feces (fecal dry matter < 24%) between 3 and 8 days after challenge, which persisted for 7 to 8 days or until necropsy at 14 days after challenge. Average weight gains in two of the three groups challenged with S. pilosicoli were significantly less than controls. The feed conversion ratios of all the groups challenged with S. pilosicoli were impaired compared to controls. The mean values for daily liveweight gain (and feed conversion ratio) for the three groups challenged with S. pilosicoli were 0.799 (2.13), 0.783 (2.05), and 0.844 kg (2.10), respectively, while that of the uninoculated controls was 0.944 kg (1.70). Gross lesions with slight mucosal thickening, congestion, and multifocal erosions were evident in seven of eight diarrheic pigs. The relative weights of the large intestines of pigs challenged with S. pilosicoli were significantly less than controls. Histologic lesions with an increase in mucosal height, infiltration of the lamina propria with mononuclear cells, mucosal erosion with mixed inflammatory cell infiltration, and goblet cell hyperplasia in colonic glands were evident in 15 of the 18 challenged pigs. S. pilosicoli was recovered on bacterial culture of the colon from all except one of the pigs with these histologic lesions. Serpulina sp. was clearly visible within the colonic glands of these affected pigs in silver-stained sections of the gut. Clinical and pathologic findings in control pigs were unremarkable, with no diarrhea or colonic lesions evident. The results provide further evidence that S. pilosicoli is a specific enteric pathogen for conventional pigs. It is capable of colonizing the large intestine and causing mucosal damage, which although mild is sufficient to result in significant adverse effects on growth.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fellström C., Gunnarsson A. Phenotypical characterisation of intestinal spirochaetes isolated from pigs. Res Vet Sci. 1995 Jul;59(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(95)90021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fellström C., Pettersson B., Thomson J., Gunnarsson A., Persson M., Johansson K. E. Identification of Serpulina species associated with porcine colitis by biochemical analysis and PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Feb;35(2):462–467. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.2.462-467.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Girard C., Lemarchand T., Higgins R. Porcine colonic spirochetosis: a retrospective study of eleven cases. Can Vet J. 1995 May;36(5):291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris D. L., Alexander T. J., Whipp S. C., Robinson I. M., Glock R. D., Matthews P. J. Swine dysentery: studies of gnotobiotic pigs inoculated with Treponema hyodysenteriae, Bacteroides vulgatus, and Fusobacterium necrophorum. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1978 Feb 15;172(4):468–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris D. L., Glock R. D., Christensen C. R., Kinyon J. M. Inoculation of pigs with Treponema hyodysenteriae (new species) and reproduction f the disease. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1972 Jan;67(1):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacques M., Girard C., Higgins R., Goyette G. Extensive colonization of the porcine colonic epithelium by a spirochete similar to Treponema innocens. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 May;27(5):1139–1141. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.5.1139-1141.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee J. I., Hampson D. J. Genetic characterisation of intestinal spirochaetes and their association with disease. J Med Microbiol. 1994 May;40(5):365–371. doi: 10.1099/00222615-40-5-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee J. I., Hampson D. J., Lymbery A. J., Harders S. J. The porcine intestinal spirochaetes: identification of new genetic groups. Vet Microbiol. 1993 Mar;34(3):273–285. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lysons R. J., Kent K. A., Bland A. P., Sellwood R., Robinson W. F., Frost A. J. A cytotoxic haemolysin from Treponema hyodysenteriae--a probable virulence determinant in swine dysentery. J Med Microbiol. 1991 Feb;34(2):97–102. doi: 10.1099/00222615-34-2-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neef N. A., Lysons R. J., Trott D. J., Hampson D. J., Jones P. W., Morgan J. H. Pathogenicity of porcine intestinal spirochetes in gnotobiotic pigs. Infect Immun. 1994 Jun;62(6):2395–2403. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.6.2395-2403.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rérat A., Fiszlewicz M., Giusi A., Vaugelade P. Influence of meal frequency on postprandial variations in the production and absorption of volatile fatty acids in the digestive tract of conscious pigs. J Anim Sci. 1987 Feb;64(2):448–456. doi: 10.2527/jas1987.642448x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stanton T. B. Proposal to change the genus designation Serpula to Serpulina gen. nov. containing the species Serpulina hyodysenteriae comb. nov. and Serpulina innocens comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992 Jan;42(1):189–190. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor D. J., Simmons J. R., Laird H. M. Production of diarrhoea and dysentery in pigs by feeding pure cultures of a spirochaete differing from Treponema hyodysenteriae. Vet Rec. 1980 Apr 12;106(15):326–332. doi: 10.1136/vr.106.15.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Trott D. J., Huxtable C. R., Hampson D. J. Experimental infection of newly weaned pigs with human and porcine strains of Serpulina pilosicoli. Infect Immun. 1996 Nov;64(11):4648–4654. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4648-4654.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trott D. J., Stanton T. B., Jensen N. S., Duhamel G. E., Johnson J. L., Hampson D. J. Serpulina pilosicoli sp. nov., the agent of porcine intestinal spirochetosis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996 Jan;46(1):206–215. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES