Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2005 Apr 20;64(11):1576–1581. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.027185

ICF based comparison of disease specific instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis

T Sigl 1, A Cieza 1, D van der Heijde 1, G Stucki 1
PMCID: PMC1755279  PMID: 15843457

Abstract

Objectives: To link validated and widely used instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and to compare their contents, based on the results of the linking process.

Methods: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Dougados Functional Index (DFI), the Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for the spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S), and the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ) were linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to 10 linkage rules.

Results: All concepts contained in the items of the selected instruments could be successfully linked to the ICF except for "illness" included in the HAQ-S. Altogether 55 different ICF categories were linked. Seven belonged to "body functions", 43 to "activities and participation", and five to "environmental factors". The component "body structure" was not contained in any of the four instruments. Only two ICF categories were common to all selected questionnaires, but there was a high level of concordance on the concepts represented in them. However, especially in terms of "activities and participation", the emphasised aspects differed.

Conclusions: The ICF provides an excellent common framework for the comparison of disease specific instruments for ankylosing spondylitis. For a future revision of the ICF, a specification of major limitations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is suggested.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbott C. A., Helliwell P. S., Chamberlain M. A. Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Nov;33(11):1060–1066. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.11.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boers M., Brooks P., Strand C. V., Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;25(2):198–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calin A., Garrett S., Whitelock H., Kennedy L. G., O'Hea J., Mallorie P., Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281–2285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chino Naoichi, Ishigami Shigenobu, Akai Masami, Liu Meigen, Okajima Yasutomo, Koike Junko, Kobayashi Kazushige. Current status of rehabilitation medicine in Asia: a report from New Millennium Asian Symposium on Rehabilitation Medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2002 Jan;34(1):1–4. doi: 10.1080/165019702317242631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daltroy L. H., Larson M. G., Roberts N. W., Liang M. H. A modification of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):946–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dougados M., Gueguen A., Nakache J. P., Nguyen M., Mery C., Amor B. Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):302–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dougados M., van der Heijde D. Evaluation of functional capacity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999 Jan;26(1):4–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eyres Sophie, Tennant Alan, Kay Lesley, Waxman Robin, Helliwell Philip S. Measuring disability in ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index with revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002 May;29(5):979–986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan Muhammad Asim. Update on spondyloarthropathies. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 18;136(12):896–907. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-12-200206180-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McHorney C. A. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):743–750. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weigl M., Cieza A., Harder M., Geyh S., Amann E., Kostanjsek N., Stucki G. Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Jul;11(7):519–523. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00086-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Heijde D., Calin A., Dougados M., Khan M. A., van der Linden S., Bellamy N. Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy, and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis. Progress report of the ASAS Working Group. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):951–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES