Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2005 Apr;64(4):612–615. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.027268

Analysis for crystals in synovial fluid: training of the analysts results in high consistency

B Lumbreras 1, E Pascual 1, J Frasquet 1, J Gonzalez-Salinas 1, E Rodriguez 1, I Hernandez-Aguado 1
PMCID: PMC1755440  PMID: 15769916

Abstract

Background: Identification of monosodium urate (MSU) and calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate (CPPD) crystals in synovial fluid samples is diagnostic of gout and CPPD crystal related arthropathy. Various studies have shown poor consistency in results of crystal analysis.

Objective: To determine whether training of the analysts increases the consistency.

Methods: An expert rheumatologist gave a course on crystal detection and identification. The four trained observers then blindly and independently examined synovial fluid samples previously classified by the expert which had been obtained from patients with both crystal arthropathies and other non-crystal related inflammatory joint conditions.

Results: 194 observations were made on 64 synovial fluid samples: 96 without crystals (49.4%), 55 with CPPD crystal (28.4%), and 43 with MSU crystals (22.2%). For crystal detection (presence or absence of crystals), sensitivity was 95.9% and specificity 86.5%. For identification of MSU crystals, sensitivity was 95.3% and specificity 97.2%. For identification of CPPD crystals, sensitivity was 92.7% and specificity 92.1%. The κ index of agreement with the reference standard between the observers was 0.84 for any crystal detection, 0.93 for MSU crystal sample identification, and 0.79 for CPPD crystal sample identification.

Conclusions: For trained observers, the detection and identification of crystals in synovial fluid is a consistent procedure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (58.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buntinx F., Schouten H. J., Knottnerus J. A., Crebolder H. F., Essed G. G. Interobserver variation in the assessment of the sampling quality of cervical smears. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;46(4):367–370. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90151-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dieppe P., Swan A. Identification of crystals in synovial fluid. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 May;58(5):261–263. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.5.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fam A. G. What is new about crystals other than monosodium urate? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000 May;12(3):228–234. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200005000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordon C., Swan A., Dieppe P. Detection of crystals in synovial fluids by light microscopy: sensitivity and reliability. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Sep;48(9):737–742. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.9.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hasselbacher P. Variation in synovial fluid analysis by hospital laboratories. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Jun;30(6):637–642. doi: 10.1002/art.1780300606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivorra J., Rosas J., Pascual E. Most calcium pyrophosphate crystals appear as non-birefringent. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Sep;58(9):582–584. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.9.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaccard Y. B., Gerster J. C., Calame L. Mixed monosodium urate and calcium pyrophosphate crystal-induced arthropathy. A review of seventeen cases. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1996 May;63(5):331–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MCCARTY D. J., HOLLANDER J. L. Identification of urate crystals in gouty synovial fluid. Ann Intern Med. 1961 Mar;54:452–460. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-54-3-452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pascual E. The diagnosis of gout and CPPD crystal arthropathy. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35(4):306–308. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.4.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pascual E., Tovar J., Ruiz M. T. The ordinary light microscope: an appropriate tool for provisional detection and identification of crystals in synovial fluid. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Dec;48(12):983–985. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.12.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schumacher H. R., Jr, Sieck M. S., Rothfuss S., Clayburne G. M., Baumgarten D. F., Mochan B. S., Kant J. A. Reproducibility of synovial fluid analyses. A study among four laboratories. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Jun;29(6):770–774. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Segal J. B., Albert D. Diagnosis of crystal-induced arthritis by synovial fluid examination for crystals: lessons from an imperfect test. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Dec;12(6):376–380. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199912)12:6<376::aid-art5>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Snaith M. L. ABC of rheumatology. Gout, hyperuricaemia, and crystal arthritis. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):521–524. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Von Essen R., Hölttä A. M. Quality control of the laboratory diagnosis of gout by synovial fluid microscopy. Scand J Rheumatol. 1990;19(3):232–234. doi: 10.3109/03009749009095048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. von Essen R., Hölttä A. M., Pikkarainen R. Quality control of synovial fluid crystal identification. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Feb;57(2):107–109. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES