Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Nov 18;64(6):926–929. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.027409

Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy using portal and forceps

J Koski 1, M Helle 1
PMCID: PMC1755510  PMID: 15550535

Abstract

Objective: To describe a new method for taking a synovial biopsy specimen under ultrasound guidance using portal and forceps.

Methods: Percutaneous ultrasound guided biopsy was performed for 37 patients with mono- or polyarthritis as outpatients. A portal to a planned area was built using a needle, guiding wire, and dilators, through which forceps could be inserted and samples taken. Biopsy samples were taken from small and large joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths.

Results: Representative synovial tissue in adequate amounts for histopathological evaluation was obtained in 33/37 cases—a success rate of 89%. The biopsy procedures were well tolerated, but one complication of skin infection was encountered.

Conclusion: The new method of synovium biopsy under ultrasound guidance using sheath introducer set and flexible forceps can be performed on most joints and even bursae and tendon sheaths. The method gives sufficient samples for clinical work in most cases, but further work is needed before accepting this promising technique for scientific purposes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (214.7 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Synovium biopsy instruments. (A) 18 gauge needle, wire, and dilators; (B) optional metallic instruments; (C, D) Olympus FB-52C-1 forceps; and (E) rigid forceps.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 Synovium biopsy of the knee joint as seen with ultrasound. (A) Needle in the lateral compartment of the knee joint (longitudinal view) (S, synovium); (B) wire; (C) plastic dilator; and (D) the flexible forceps.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

 Synovium biopsy of the tibialis posterior tendon sheath as seen with ultrasound. (A) Needle and wire in the tendon sheath; (B) metallic dilator on the tendon; and (C, D) open jaws of the forceps ready for a bite.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnett F. C., Edworthy S. M., Bloch D. A., McShane D. J., Fries J. F., Cooper N. S., Healey L. A., Kaplan S. R., Liang M. H., Luthra H. S. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315–324. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baeten D., Van den Bosch F., Elewaut D., Stuer A., Veys E. M., De Keyser F. Needle arthroscopy of the knee with synovial biopsy sampling: technical experience in 150 patients. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(6):434–441. doi: 10.1007/s100670050134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaulé V., Larédo J. D., Cywiner C., Bard M., Tubiana J. M. Synovial membrane: percutaneous biopsy. Radiology. 1990 Nov;177(2):581–585. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresnihan B., Tak P. P., Emery P., Klareskog L., Breedveld F. Synovial biopsy in arthritis research: five years of concerted European collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Jul;59(7):506–511. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.7.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolhain R. J., Ter Haar N. T., De Kuiper R., Nieuwenhuis I. G., Zwinderman A. H., Breedveld F. C., Miltenburg A. M. Distribution of T cells and signs of T-cell activation in the rheumatoid joint: implications for semiquantitative comparative histology. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar;37(3):324–330. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.3.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dougados M., van der Linden S., Juhlin R., Huitfeldt B., Amor B., Calin A., Cats A., Dijkmans B., Olivieri I., Pasero G. The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;34(10):1218–1227. doi: 10.1002/art.1780341003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grassi W., Cervini C. Ultrasonography in rheumatology: an evolving technique. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 May;57(5):268–271. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.5.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horton L. K., Jacobson J. A., Powell A., Fessell D. P., Hayes C. W. Sonography and radiography of soft-tissue foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 May;176(5):1155–1159. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koski J. M. Ultrasound guided injections in rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 2000 Sep;27(9):2131–2138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kraan Maarten C., Reece Richard J., Smeets Tom J. M., Veale Douglas J., Emery Paul, Tak Paul P. Comparison of synovial tissues from the knee joints and the small joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients: Implications for pathogenesis and evaluation of treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2034–2038. doi: 10.1002/art.10556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsen A., Dale K., Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1977 Jul;18(4):481–491. doi: 10.1177/028418517701800415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matsuzaki Saeko, Yoneda Minoru, Kobayashi Yasushi, Fukushima Sunao, Wakitani Shigeyuki. Dynamic enhanced MRI of the subacromial bursa: correlation with arthroscopic and histological findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Jul 11;32(9):510–520. doi: 10.1007/s00256-003-0655-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moon M. S., Kim I., Kim J. M., Lee H. S., Ahn Y. P. Synovial biopsy by Franklin--Silverman needle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jul-Aug;(150):224–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PARKER R. H., PEARSON C. M. A simplified synovial biopsy needle. Arthritis Rheum. 1963 Apr;6:172–176. doi: 10.1002/art.1780060209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rooney M., Condell D., Quinlan W., Daly L., Whelan A., Feighery C., Bresnihan B. Analysis of the histologic variation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Aug;31(8):956–963. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schumacher H. R., Jr, Kulka J. P. Needle biopsy of the synovial membrane--experience with the Parker-Pearson technic. N Engl J Med. 1972 Feb 24;286(8):416–419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197202242860807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tak P. P. Analysis of synovial biopsy samples: opportunities and challenges. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Dec;59(12):929–930. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.12.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tak P. P., Bresnihan B. The pathogenesis and prevention of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: advances from synovial biopsy and tissue analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Dec;43(12):2619–2633. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2619::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. van Vugt R. M., van Dalen A., Bijlsma J. W. Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy of the wrist. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(3):212–214. doi: 10.3109/03009749709065683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES