Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different durations of stretching (five or 15 seconds) on active and passive range of motion (ROM) in the lower extremity during a five week flexibility training programme. METHOD: Twenty four university sport club members (19 men, five women), with a mean (SD) age of 20.5 (1.35) years, were randomly assigned to one of three groups (two treatment and one control). The two treatment groups participated in a static active stretching programme three times a week for a five week period, holding each stretch for a duration of either five or 15 seconds. The total amount of time spent in a stretched position was controlled. The five second group performed each stretch nine times and the 15 second group three times resulting in a total stretching time of 45 seconds for both groups for each exercise. The control group did not stretch. Active and passive ROM were determined during left hip flexion, left knee flexion, and left knee extension before and after the training programme using an inclinometer. RESULTS: Two factor within subject analysis of variance indicated no significant difference in ROM before and after the training programme for the control group. However, significant improvements in active and passive ROM (p < 0.05) were shown in both treatment groups after the five week training programme. Two factor analysis of variance with repeated measures and post hoc analysis showed significant differences between the treatment groups and the control group for the improvements observed in active (p < 0.05) and passive (p < 0.05) ROM. The five and 15 second treatment groups did not differ from one another when ROM was assessed passively, but significant differences were apparent for active ROM, with the 15 second group showing significantly greater improvements (p < 0.05) than the five second group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that holding stretches for 15 seconds, as opposed to five seconds, may result in greater improvements in active ROM. However, sustaining a stretch may not significantly affect the improvements gained in passive ROM.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson B., Burke E. R. Scientific, medical, and practical aspects of stretching. Clin Sports Med. 1991 Jan;10(1):63–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bandy W. D., Irion J. M. The effect of time on static stretch on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther. 1994 Sep;74(9):845–852. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borms J., Van Roy P., Santens J. P., Haentjens A. Optimal duration of static stretching exercises for improvement of coxo-femoral flexibility. J Sports Sci. 1987 Spring;5(1):39–47. doi: 10.1080/02640418708729762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornelius W. L., Hagemann R. W., Jr, Jackson A. W. A study on placement of stretching within a workout. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1988 Sep;28(3):234–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etnyre B. R., Abraham L. D. Gains in range of ankle dorsiflexion using three popular stretching techniques. Am J Phys Med. 1986 Aug;65(4):189–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sady S. P., Wortman M., Blanke D. Flexibility training: ballistic, static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Jun;63(6):261–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shellock F. G., Prentice W. E. Warming-up and stretching for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries. Sports Med. 1985 Jul-Aug;2(4):267–278. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198502040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]