Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Jan;21(1):105–111. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.009050

Results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of triage and direct transportation to minor injuries units by ambulance crews

H Snooks 1, T Foster 1, J Nicholl 1
PMCID: PMC1756342  PMID: 14734396

Abstract

Methods: Ambulance crews in two services were asked to transport appropriate patients to MIU during randomly selected weeks of one year. During all other weeks they were to treat such patients according to normal practice. Patients were followed up through ambulance service, hospital and/or MIU records, and by postal questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with crews (n = 15). Cases transferred from MIU to accident and emergency (A&E) were reviewed.

Results: 41 intervention cluster patients attended MIU, 303 attended A&E, 65 were not conveyed. Thirty seven control cluster patients attended MIU, 327 attended A&E, 61 stayed at scene. Because of low study design compliance, outcomes of patients taken to MIU were compared with those taken to A&E, adjusted for case mix. MIU patients were 7.2 times as likely to rate their care as excellent (95% CI 1.99 to 25.8). Ambulance service job-cycle time and time in unit were shorter for MIU patients (-7.8, 95% CI -11.5 to -4.1); (-222.7, 95%CI -331.9 to -123.5). Crews cited patient and operational factors as inhibiting MIU use; and location, service, patient choice, job-cycle time, and handover as encouraging their use. Of seven patients transferred by ambulance from MIU to A&E, medical reviewers judged that three had not met the protocol for conveyance to MIU. No patients were judged to have suffered adverse consequences.

Conclusions: MIUs were only used for a small proportion of eligible patients. When they were used, patients and the ambulance service benefited.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (243.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brice J. H., Garrison H. G., Evans A. T. Study design and outcomes in out-of-hospital emergency medicine research: a ten-year analysis. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Apr-Jun;4(2):144–150. doi: 10.1080/10903120090941416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Callaham M. Quantifying the scanty science of prehospital emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Dec;30(6):785–790. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey R. G., Seibert J. H. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity. Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):834–845. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J. C., Bullard M. J., Liaw S. J. Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):73–78. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kamper M., Mahoney B. D., Nelson S., Peterson J. Feasibility of paramedic treatment and referral of minor illnesses and injuries. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Oct-Dec;5(4):371–378. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mann C., Guly H. Is the emergency (999) service being misused? Retrospective analysis. BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):437–438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Palazzo F. F., Warner O. J., Harron M., Sadana A. Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why? J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;15(6):368–370. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.6.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Snooks H., Wrigley H., George S., Thomas E., Smith H., Glasper A. Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;15(4):212–215. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.4.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Snooks Helen, Williams Susan, Crouch Robert, Foster Theresa, Hartley-Sharpe Chris, Dale Jeremy. NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life threatening nor serious. BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):330–333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Spaite D. W., Criss E. A., Valenzuela T. D., Guisto J. Emergency medical service systems research: problems of the past, challenges of the future. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Aug;26(2):146–152. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Victor C. R., Peacock J. L., Chazot C., Walsh S., Holmes D. Who calls 999 and why? A survey of the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 May;16(3):174–178. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.3.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES