Abstract
Objectives: This paper describes a new surveillance system called the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), initiated by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NVDRS's mission is the collection of detailed, timely information on all violent deaths.
Design: NVDRS is a population based, active surveillance system designed to obtain a complete census of all resident and occurrent violent deaths. Each state collects information on its own deaths from death certificates, medical examiner/coroner files, law enforcement records, and crime laboratories. Deaths occurring in the same incident are linked. Over 270 data elements can be collected on each incident.
Setting: The 13 state health departments of Alaska, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Subjects: Cases consist of violent deaths from suicide, homicide, undetermined intent, legal intervention, and unintentional firearm injury. Information is collected on suspects as well as victims.
Interventions: None.
Outcome measures: The quality of surveillance will be measured in terms of its acceptability, accuracy, sensitivity, timeliness, utility, and cost.
Results: The system has just been started. There are no results as yet.
Conclusions: NVDRS has achieved enough support to begin data collection efforts in selected states. This system will need to overcome the significant barriers to such a large data collection effort. Its success depends on the use of its data to inform and assess violence prevention efforts. If successful, it will open a new chapter in the use of empirical information to guide public policy around violence in the United States.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (213.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barber C., Hemenway D., Hargarten S., Kellermann A., Azrael D., Wilt S. A "call to arms" for a national reporting system on firearm injuries. Am J Public Health. 2000 Aug;90(8):1191–1193. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barber C., Hemenway D., Hochstadt J., Azrael D. Underestimates of unintentional firearm fatalities: comparing Supplementary Homicide Report data with the National Vital Statistics System. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8(3):252–256. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.3.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodin J., Hanzlick R. Mind your manners. Part II: General results from the National Association of Medical Examiners Manner of Death Questionnaire, 1995. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997 Sep;18(3):224–227. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199709000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankey B. F., Ries L. A., Edwards B. K. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Dec;8(12):1117–1121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellermann A. L., Bartolomeos K. K. Firearm injury surveillance at the local level from data to action. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Oct;15(3 Suppl):109–112. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaechter Judy, Duran Isis, De Marchena Jacqueline, Lemard Glendene, Villar Maria Elena. Are "accidental" gun deaths as rare as they seem? A comparison of medical examiner manner of death coding with an intent-based classification approach. Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):741–744. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.4.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teret S. P., Wintemute G. J., Beilenson P. L. The Firearm Fatality Reporting System. A proposal. JAMA. 1992 Jun 10;267(22):3073–3074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Withers R. L., Mercy J. A., Hargarten S. W. Public health: a successful paradigm applied to firearm injuries. WMJ. 2000 Jan-Feb;99(1):48–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]