Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2004 Feb;10(1):33–36. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.003020

Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries

G Whitlock 1, R Norton 1, T Clark 1, R Jackson 1, S MacMahon 1
PMCID: PMC1756540  PMID: 14760024

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association of marital status with risk of motor vehicle driver injury.

Design: A cohort study with prospective and retrospective outcomes.

Setting: New Zealand.

Participants: A total of 10 525 adults (a volunteer sample of a multi-industry workforce, n = 8008; and a random sample of urban electoral rolls, n = 2517).

Exposure variable: Self reported marital status, assessed from a questionnaire administered in 1992–93 (baseline).

Main outcome measure: Motor vehicle driver injury resulting in admission of the driver to hospital and/or the driver's death, during the period 1988–98; hospitalisation and mortality data were obtained by record linkage to national health databases.

Results: During 108 741 person-years of follow up, 139 driver injury cases occurred (85 before baseline, 54 after). After adjustment for age, sex, and study cohort, never married participants had twice the risk of driver injury (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 3.16) as married participants (HR 1.00). The relative risk for never married participants was slightly higher (HR 2.29), though less precise (95% CI 1.39 to 3.76), after further adjustment for alcohol intake, driving exposure, area of residence, body mass index, and occupational status.

Conclusions: After taking age, sex, and other variables into account, never married people had a substantially higher risk of driver injury than married people. While requiring corroboration, these findings imply that it may be appropriate for driver injury countermeasures to be targeted to never married people.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (229.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERKSON J. Mortality and marital status. Reflections on the derivation of etiology from statistics. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 Aug;52:1318–1329. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.8.1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barreto S. M., Swerdlow A. J., Smith P. G., Higgins C. D. Risk of death from motor-vehicle injury in Brazilian steelworkers: a nested case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):814–821. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Böhning D., Na Ayutha R. S. A case-control study of non-fatal traffic accidents on hospital patients in Bangkok metropolis. Soz Praventivmed. 1997;42(6):351–357. doi: 10.1007/BF01318610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gove W. R. Sex, marital status, and mortality. AJS. 1973 Jul;79(1):45–67. doi: 10.1086/225505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Koskenvuo M., Sarna S., Kaprio J., Lönnqvist J. Cause-specific mortality by marital status and social class in Finland during 1969--1971. Soc Sci Med Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1979 Nov;13A(6):691–697. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(79)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Langley J. D. Experiences using New Zealand's hospital based surveillance system for injury prevention research. Methods Inf Med. 1995 Sep;34(4):340–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MCCARROLL J. R., HADDON W., Jr A controlled study of ratal automobile accidents in New York City. J Chronic Dis. 1962 Aug;15:811–826. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(62)90051-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MacMahon S., Norton R., Jackson R., Mackie M. J., Cheng A., Vander Hoorn S., Milne A., McCulloch A. Fletcher Challenge-University of Auckland Heart & Health Study: design and baseline findings. N Z Med J. 1995 Dec 8;108(1013):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morelock S., Hingson R. W., Smith R. A., Lederman R. I. Mandatory seatbelt law support and opposition in New England--a survey. Public Health Rep. 1985 Jul-Aug;100(4):357–363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. West G. B., Moskal P. D. Gender and marital differences for risk taking among undergraduates. Psychol Rep. 1996 Feb;78(1):315–320. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Whitlock G., Norton R., Clark T., Pledger M., Jackson R., MacMahon S. Motor vehicle driver injury and socioeconomic status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jul;57(7):512–516. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.7.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Whitlock Gary, Norton Robyn, Clark Taane, Jackson Rodney, MacMahon Stephen. Is body mass index a risk factor for motor vehicle driver injury? A cohort study with prospective and retrospective outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):147–149. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES