Abstract
Objectives: This paper examines the cost effectiveness of the compulsory bicycle helmet wearing law (HWL) introduced in New Zealand on 1 January 1994. The societal perspective of costs is used for the purchase of helmets and the value of injuries averted. This is augmented with healthcare costs averted from reduced head injuries.
Methods: Three age groups were examined: cyclists aged 5–12 years, 13–18 years, and ≥19 years. The number of head and non-head injuries averted were obtained from epidemiological studies. Estimates of the numbers of cyclists and the costs of helmets are used to derive the total spending on new bicycle helmets. Healthcare costs were obtained from national hospitalisation database, and the value of injuries averted was obtained directly from a willingness-to-pay survey undertaken by the Land Transport Safety Authority. Cost effectiveness ratios, benefit:cost ratios, and the value of net benefits were estimated.
Results: The net benefit (benefit:cost ratios) of the HWL for the 5–12, 13–18, and ≥19 year age groups was $0.3m (2.6), -$0.2m (0.8), and -$1.5m (0.7) (in NZ $, 2000 prices; NZ $1.00 = US $0.47 = UK £0.31 approx). These results were most sensitive to the cost and life of helmets, helmet wearing rates before the HWL, and the effectiveness of helmets in preventing head injuries.
Conclusions: The HWL was cost saving in the youngest age group but large costs from the law were imposed on adult (≥19 years) cyclists.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Attewell R. G., Glase K., McFadden M. Bicycle helmet efficacy: a meta-analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):345–352. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron M. H., Vulcan A. P., Finch C. F., Newstead S. V. Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria, Australia--an evaluation. Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Jun;26(3):325–337. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farris C., Spaite D. W., Criss E. A., Valenzuela T. D., Meislin H. W. Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 May;29(5):625–629. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70251-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen P., Scuffham P. A. The cost-effectiveness of compulsory bicycle helmets in New Zealand. Aust J Public Health. 1995 Oct;19(5):450–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendrickson S. G., Becker H. Impact of a theory based intervention to increase bicycle helmet use in low income children. Inj Prev. 1998 Jun;4(2):126–131. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanny D., Schieber R. A., Pryor V., Kresnow M. J. Effectiveness of a state law mandating use of bicycle helmets among children: an observational evaluation. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Dec 1;154(11):1072–1076. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.11.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim A. N., Rivara F. P., Koepsell T. D. Does sharing the cost of a bicycle helmet help promote helmet use? Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):38–42. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komanoff C. Safety in numbers? A new dimension to the bicycle helmet controversy. Inj Prev. 2001 Dec;7(4):343–343. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.4.343-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kopjar B., Wickizer T. M. Age gradient in the cost-effectiveness of bicycle helmets. Prev Med. 2000 May;30(5):401–406. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macpherson A. K., Parkin P. C., To T. M. Mandatory helmet legislation and children's exposure to cycling. Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7(3):228–230. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.3.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivara F. P., Astley S. J., Clarren S. K., Thompson D. C., Thompson R. S. Fit of bicycle safety helmets and risk of head injuries in children. Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):194–197. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson D. L. Changes in head injury with the New Zealand bicycle helmet law. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Sep;33(5):687–691. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00073-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson D. L. Head injuries and bicycle helmet laws. Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Jul;28(4):463–475. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(96)00016-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodgers G. B. Effects of state helmet laws on bicycle helmet use by children and adolescents. Inj Prev. 2002 Mar;8(1):42–46. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulman J., Sacks J., Provenzano G. State level estimates of the incidence and economic burden of head injuries stemming from non-universal use of bicycle helmets. Inj Prev. 2002 Mar;8(1):47–52. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scuffham P. A., Langley J. D. Trends in cycle injury in New Zealand under voluntary helmet use. Accid Anal Prev. 1997 Jan;29(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scuffham P., Alsop J., Cryer C., Langley J. D. Head injuries to bicyclists and the New Zealand bicycle helmet law. Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Jul;32(4):565–573. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vulcan P., Lane J. Bicycle helmets reduce head injuries and should be worn by all. Inj Prev. 1996 Dec;2(4):251–252. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.4.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]