Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2002 Dec;8(4):321–323. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.321

Identification and characteristics of victims of violence identified by emergency physicians, triage nurses, and the police

A Howe 1, M Crilly 1
PMCID: PMC1756580  PMID: 12460971

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were threefold—to evaluate the identification and characteristics of victims of assault who attend an accident and emergency (A&E) department; to compare the total number of assaults recorded in the A&E department with the number recorded by the police; and to assess a system for collecting the location and method of assault.

Setting: The A&E department of Chorley and South Ribble Hospital Trust, Lancashire, England.

Methods: A three month prospective study was performed. Victims of violence recorded on computer by doctors at discharge were compared with those identified at initial nurse triage. A comparison of police data with the A&E data relating to Chorley residents was performed. Additional information on the method and location of assault was also collected.

Results: During the period 305 (2.6%) of the patients attending A&E were identified as having been assaulted. Of the 305 individuals, 236 (77%) were identified by a doctor while 173 (57%) such patients were identified by a triage nurse. A&E identified twice the number of assaults involving Chorley residents as the police. Both men and women were most likely to have been injured on the street (44% and 37% respectively), although a greater proportion of women were injured at home (24%) than men (10%). The majority of injuries were sustained by blows from fists, feet, and heads (73%).

Conclusions: A&E doctors identify significantly more patients as the victims of violence than do nurses at triage. Using A&E data identifies assaulted individuals not identified by the police. Computer systems can be used in A&E to provide a more complete picture of the occurrence of violence in the community.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acierno R., Resnick H. S., Kilpatrick D. G. Health impact of interpersonal violence. 1: Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women. Behav Med. 1997 Summer;23(2):53–64. doi: 10.1080/08964289709596729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frattaroli S., Teret S. P. Why firearm injury surveillance? Am J Prev Med. 1998 Oct;15(3 Suppl):2–5. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00067-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodwin V., Shepherd J. P. The development of an assault patient questionnaire to allow accident and emergency departments to contribute to Crime and Disorder Act local crime audits. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 May;17(3):196–198. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.3.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorman D. R., Ramsay L. J., Wilson G. S., Freeland P. Using routine accident and emergency department data to describe local injury epidemiology. Public Health. 1999 Nov;113(6):285–289. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(99)00181-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hassey A., Gerrett D., Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1401–1405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Houry D., Feldhaus K. M., Nyquist S. R., Abbott J., Pons P. T. Emergency department documentation in cases of intentional assault. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;34(6):715–719. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70096-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howe A., Crilly M., Fairhurst R. Acceptability of asking patients about violence in accident and emergency. Emerg Med J. 2002 Mar;19(2):138–140. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mercy J. A., Ikeda R., Powell K. E. Firearm-related injury surveillance. An overview of progress and the challenges ahead. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Oct;15(3 Suppl):6–16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shepherd J. P., Sivarajasingam V., Rivara F. P. Using injury data for violence prevention. Government proposal is an important step towards safer communities. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1481–1482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shepherd J. P. Tackling violence. BMJ. 1998 Mar 21;316(7135):879–879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7135.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shepherd J., Shapland M., Scully C. Recording by the police of violent offences; an Accident and Emergency Department perspective. Med Sci Law. 1989 Jul;29(3):251–257. doi: 10.1177/002580248902900311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sivarajasingam V., Shepherd J. P. Trends in community violence in England and Wales 1995-1998: an accident and emergency department perspective. Emerg Med J. 2001 Mar;18(2):105–109. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.2.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wright J., Kariya A. Assault patients attending a Scottish accident and emergency department. J R Soc Med. 1997 Jun;90(6):322–326. doi: 10.1177/014107689709000608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES