Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1998 May;52(5):310–317. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310

Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA

M F MacDorman, G K Singh
PMCID: PMC1756707  PMID: 9764282

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are significant differences in birth outcomes and survival for infants delivered by certified nurse midwives compared with those delivered by physicians, and whether these differences, if they exist, remain after controlling for sociodemographic and medical risk factors. DESIGN: Logistic regression models were used to examine differences between certified nurse midwife and physician delivered births in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality, and risk of low birthweight after controlling for a variety of social and medical risk factors. Ordinary least squares regression models were used to examine differences in mean birthweight after controlling for the same risk factors. STUDY SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: The study included all singleton, vaginal births at 35-43 weeks gestation delivered either by physicians or certified nurse midwives in the United States in 1991. MAIN RESULTS: After controlling for social and medical risk factors, the risk of experiencing an infant death was 19% lower for certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births, the risk of neonatal mortality was 33% lower, and the risk of delivering a low birthweight infant 31% lower. Mean birthweight was 37 grams heavier for the certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births. CONCLUSIONS: National data support the findings of previous local studies that certified nurse midwives have excellent birth outcomes. These findings are discussed in light of differences between certified nurse midwives and physicians in prenatal care and labour and delivery care practices. Certified nurse midwives provide a safe and viable alternative to maternity care in the United States, particularly for low to moderate risk women.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldwin L. M., Raine T., Jenkins L. D., Hart L. G., Rosenblatt R. Do providers adhere to ACOG standards? The case of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):549–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Becerra J. E., Hogue C. J., Atrash H. K., Pérez N. Infant mortality among Hispanics. A portrait of heterogeneity. JAMA. 1991 Jan 9;265(2):217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buescher P. A., Smith C., Holliday J. L., Levine R. H. Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: the case of a North Carolina county. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):204–210. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buescher P. A., Taylor K. P., Davis M. H., Bowling J. M. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163–1165. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butler J., Abrams B., Parker J., Roberts J. M., Laros R. K., Jr Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1407–1413. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90773-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butter I. H., Kay B. J. State laws and the practice of lay midwifery. Am J Public Health. 1988 Sep;78(9):1161–1169. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambliss L. R., Daly C., Medearis A. L., Ames M., Kayne M., Paul R. The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):161–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. David R. J. The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files. Am J Public Health. 1980 Sep;70(9):964–973. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.9.964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis L. G., Riedmann G. L., Sapiro M., Minogue J. P., Kazer R. R. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians. J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Mar-Apr;39(2):91–97. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Declercq E. R. Midwifery care and medical complications: the role of risk screening. Birth. 1995 Jun;22(2):68–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1995.tb00562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Declercq E. R. The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988. Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):680–684. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.5.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Declercq E. R. Where babies are born and who attends their births: findings from the revised 1989 United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):997–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Edmunds J. Premature babes. Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter;(36):33–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Greulich B., Paine L. L., McClain C., Barger M. K., Edwards N., Paul R. Twelve years and more than 30,000 nurse-midwife-attended births: the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California women's hospital birth center experience. J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Jul-Aug;39(4):185–196. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hueston W. J., Rudy M. A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1993 Nov;37(5):449–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennell J., Klaus M., McGrath S., Robertson S., Hinkley C. Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2197–2201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klaus M. H., Kennell J. H., Robertson S. S., Sosa R. Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):585–587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Knedle-Murray M. E., Oakley D. J., Wheeler J. R., Petersen B. A. Production process substitution in maternity care: issues of cost, quality, and outcomes by nurse-midwives and physician providers. Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):81–112. doi: 10.1177/002570879305000106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kogan M. D., Alexander G. R., Kotelchuck M., Nagey D. A. Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight. Maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures. JAMA. 1994 May 4;271(17):1340–1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller C. A. Maternal and infant care: comparisons between Western Europe and the United States. Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(4):655–664. doi: 10.2190/RR4G-NTB1-L229-FVHG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Parker J. D. Ethnic differences in midwife-attended US births. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1139–1141. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Snowden M., Hall C., Adams M., Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):758–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rooks J. P., Weatherby N. L., Ernst E. K., Stapleton S., Rosen D., Rosenfield A. Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study. N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 28;321(26):1804–1811. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912283212606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rooks J. P., Weatherby N. L., Ernst E. K. The National Birth Center Study. Part I--Methodology and prenatal care and referrals. J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Jul-Aug;37(4):222–253. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90128-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rooks J. P., Weatherby N. L., Ernst E. K. The National Birth Center Study. Part II--Intrapartum and immediate postpartum and neonatal care. J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Sep-Oct;37(5):301–330. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90239-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rooks J. P., Weatherby N. L., Ernst E. K. The National Birth Center Study. Part III--Intrapartum and immediate postpartum and neonatal complications and transfers, postpartum and neonatal care, outcomes, and client satisfaction. J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Nov-Dec;37(6):361–397. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90122-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenblatt R. A. The perinatal paradox: doing more and accomplishing less. Health Aff (Millwood) 1989 Fall;8(3):158–168. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.8.3.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schimmel L. M., Lee K. A., Benner P. E., Schimmel L. D. A comparison of outcomes between joint and physician-only obstetric practices. Birth. 1994 Dec;21(4):197–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1994.tb00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Scupholme A., DeJoseph J., Strobino D. M., Paine L. L. Nurse-midwifery care to vulnerable populations. Phase I: Demographic characteristics of the National CNM Sample. J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Sep-Oct;37(5):341–348. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90241-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scupholme A., Paine L. L., Lang J. M., Kumar S., DeJoseph J. F. Time associated with components of clinical services rendered by nurse-midwives. Sample data from phase II of nurse-midwifery care to vulnerable populations in the United States. J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Jan-Feb;39(1):5–12. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sosa R., Kennell J., Klaus M., Robertson S., Urrutia J. The effect of a supportive companion on perinatal problems, length of labor, and mother-infant interaction. N Engl J Med. 1980 Sep 11;303(11):597–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198009113031101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Strobino D. M., Baruffi G., Dellinger W. S., Jr, Ross A. Variations in pregnancy outcomes and use of obstetric procedures in two institutions with divergent philosophies of maternity care. Med Care. 1988 Apr;26(4):333–347. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198804000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Turnbull D., Holmes A., Shields N., Cheyne H., Twaddle S., Gilmour W. H., McGinley M., Reid M., Johnstone I., Geer I. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):213–218. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)11207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Walsh L. V., Boggess J. H. Findings of the American College of Nurse-Midwives Annual Membership Surveys, 1993 and 1994. J Nurse Midwifery. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):230–235. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(96)00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yankou D., Petersen B. A., Oakley D., Mayes F. Philosophy of care. A pilot study comparing certified nurse-midwives and physicians. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 May-Jun;38(3):159–164. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90040-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. el Halta V. Too small, too soon. Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ. 1995 Winter;(36):35–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES