Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of the official statistic on infant deaths in Taiwan has been questioned. This study aimed to survey infant deaths nationwide, to measure associated vital statistics, and compare them with the official statistics to assess accuracy. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationwide survey of all gestational outcomes occurring at > or = 20 weeks' gestation over a three day study period (15-17 May 1989) was conducted to collect data from 23 counties and cities nationwide using a two stage data collection procedure. MAIN RESULTS: The survey derived infant death rate was 9.72 per 1000 live births, which was higher than the reported official statistic of 5.71 per 1000 live births. A more detailed examination of data on infant deaths showed that the estimated neonatal death rate of 6.68 per 1000 live births (95% confidence intervals: 3.33, 11.96 per 1000 live births) was significantly higher than the published official statistic of 1.94 per 1000 live births, while the postneonatal mortality of 3.04 per 1000 live births was comparable to the reported statistic of 3.37 per 1000 live births. CONCLUSIONS: This study empirically documented the underregistration of infant deaths in Taiwan, particularly those occurring during the first 27 days of life.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Howell E. M., Blondel B. International infant mortality rates: bias from reporting differences. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):850–852. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee W. C. Analysis of seasonal data using the Lorenz curve and the associated Gini index. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;25(2):426–434. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.2.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luke B., Williams C., Minogue J., Keith L. The changing pattern of infant mortality in the US: the role of prenatal factors and their obstetrical implications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;40(3):199–212. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90832-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lumbiganon P., Panamonta M., Laopaiboon M., Pothinam S., Patithat N. Why are Thai official perinatal and infant mortality rates so low? Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;19(4):997–1000. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.4.997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nersesian W. S. Infant mortality in socially vulnerable populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1988;9:361–377. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.09.050188.002045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sepkowitz S. International rankings of infant mortality and the United States' vital statistics natality data collecting system--failure and success. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun;24(3):583–588. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.3.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]