Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1998 Sep;52(9):595–601. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.9.595

Randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme in Hailsham, East Sussex, on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors

A H Taylor, J Doust, N Webborn
PMCID: PMC1756762  PMID: 10320861

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. A battery of validated measures were carried out at 0, 8, 16, 26, and 37 weeks. SETTING: Two community health centres and a leisure centre in Hailsham, East Sussex. SUBJECTS: 389 patients (smokers, hypertensive or overweight) were selected from medical records, screened for contraindications to exercise and 345 were invited into the study. Of 142 patients randomly allocated, 40 (41%) completed the study in the exercise group and 31 (69%) in the control group. Sixty (35%) invited smokers (48% of non-smokers), 71 (38%) invited hypertensive patients (45% of non-hypertensive patients), and 107 (45%) overweight patients (33% of non-overweight patients) were randomised. Of those randomised, 27 (45%) smokers, 52 (48%) overweight, and 43 (61%) hypertensive patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: The exercise group was offered 20, half price sessions over 10 weeks at a leisure centre. Patients engaged in moderate and vigorous aerobic type activity on various exercise machines, in a semi-supervised, informal environment. RESULTS: 87% of those referred used the prescription and 28% (high adherers)(45% of obese patients) did at least 15 sessions. The exercise group reduced sum of skinfolds by 8.1% (2.9 to 13.3, 95% confidence intervals) more than the control group, up to 16 weeks after baseline. High adherers reduced sum of skinfolds by 9.2% (0.9 to 17.5) more than the control group, up to 26 weeks. High adherers reduced systolic blood pressure by 7.2% (-0.7 to 14.9) (that is, 9 mm Hg) more than low adherers, up to 37 weeks. Non-smokers and obese patients attended more prescribed sessions than smokers and non- overweight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in sum of skinfolds was maintained up to 26 weeks, among high adherers compared with controls. Reduction in systolic blood pressure was evident up to 37 weeks among high adherers, but only in comparison with low adherers. Selection of appropriate referees and use of other strategies to improve exercise adherence will help to maximise the benefits from GP exercise prescription schemes.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davies G., Pyke S., Kinmonth A. L. Effect of non-attenders on the potential of a primary care programme to reduce cardiovascular risk in the population. Family Heart Study Group. BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1553–1556. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6968.1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dishman R. K., Steinhardt M. Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d re-call of physical activity in college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988 Feb;20(1):14–25. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198802000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Durnin J. V., Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974 Jul;32(1):77–97. doi: 10.1079/bjn19740060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fentem P. H. ABC of sports medicine. Benefits of exercise in health and disease. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1291–1295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hillsdon M., Thorogood M., Anstiss T., Morris J. Randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in free living populations: a review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Oct;49(5):448–453. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.5.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iliffe S., Tai S. S., Gould M., Thorogood M., Hillsdon M. Prescribing exercise in general practice. BMJ. 1994 Aug 20;309(6953):494–495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. James W. P. A public health approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 Sep;19 (Suppl 3):S37–S45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McQuay H., Moore A. Need for rigorous assessment of palliative care. BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1315–1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller D. J., Freedson P. S., Kline G. M. Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Mar;26(3):376–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris J. N. Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jul;26(7):807–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paffenbarger R. S., Jr, Blair S. N., Lee I. M., Hyde R. T. Measurement of physical activity to assess health effects in free-living populations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):60–70. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pill R., French J., Harding K., Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Feb;38(307):53–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor C. B., Coffey T., Berra K., Iaffaldano R., Casey K., Haskell W. L. Seven-day activity and self-report compared to a direct measure of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;120(6):818–824. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES