Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1999 Oct;53(10):612–623. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.10.612

Comparing individual-based and household-based measures of social class to assess class inequalities in women's health: a methodological study of 684 US women

N Krieger, J T Chen, J V Selby
PMCID: PMC1756781  PMID: 10616673

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare magnitude of class inequalities in women's health detected with four occupation-based class measures: individual, conventional household (male dominant), gender neutral household, and combined household. DESIGN: Cross sectional study, using health data obtained by physical examination, laboratory analysis, and self report. SETTING: A large pre-paid health maintenance organisation in Oakland, CA (US). PARTICIPANTS: 686 women (90% white) enrolled in Examination II of the Kaiser Permanente Women Twins Study (1989-1990). MAIN RESULTS: The proportion of women categorised as "working class" equalled 45, 30, and 21 per cent, respectively, for the individual level, gender neutral household, and conventional household class measures. Class inequalities in health, comparing women categorised as working class with non-working class, generally were stronger using the gender neutral household class measure, compared with the conventional household or individual class measure; in the case of "fair or poor" health, the respective odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (adjusted for age and marital status) were 1.9 (1.1, 3.4), 1.5 (0.9, 2.5), and 1.3 (0.8, 2.2), while for high post-load glucose levels, they were 1.7 (1.1, 2.6), 1.2 (0.8, 1.7), and 1.3 (0.9, 1.8). The combined household class measure yielded effect estimates comparable to those of the gender neutral household class measure but with less precision, because of smaller strata. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological studies concerning class inequalities in women's health should use the gender neutral household class measure or, if sample size is sufficiently large, the combined household class measure.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arber S. Class, paid employment and family roles: making sense of structural disadvantage, gender and health status. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(4):425–436. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90344-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arber S. Comparing inequalities in women's and men's health: Britain in the 1990s. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):773–787. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00185-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arber S., Ginn J. Gender and inequalities in health in later life. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jan;36(1):33–46. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90303-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arber S., Lahelma E. Inequalities in women's and men's ill-health: Britain and Finland compared. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Oct;37(8):1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90440-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arber S. Social class, non-employment, and chronic illness: continuing the inequalities in health debate. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 25;294(6579):1069–1073. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6579.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chandola T. Social inequality in coronary heart disease: a comparison of occupational classifications. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(4):525–533. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davey Smith G., Hart C., Hole D., MacKinnon P., Gillis C., Watt G., Blane D., Hawthorne V. Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Mar;52(3):153–160. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.3.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fabsitz R., Feinleib M., Hubert H. Regression analysis of data with correlated errors: an example from the NHLBI twin study. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(2):165–170. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krieger N., Fee E. Measuring social inequalities in health in the United States: a historical review, 1900-1950. Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(3):391–418. doi: 10.2190/B3AH-Q5KE-VBGF-NC74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krieger N., Fee E. Social class: the missing link in U.S. health data. Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(1):25–44. doi: 10.2190/2JG7-YMD5-WCP2-XXNT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krieger N., Okamoto A., Selby J. V. Adult female twins' recall of childhood social class and father's education: a validation study for public health research. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 1;147(7):704–708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krieger N., Williams D. R., Moss N. E. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–378. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krieger N. Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Mar;45(1):35–42. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mayer E. J., Newman B., Austin M. A., Zhang D., Quesenberry C. P., Jr, Edwards K., Selby J. V. Genetic and environmental influences on insulin levels and the insulin resistance syndrome: an analysis of women twins. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Feb 15;143(4):323–332. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayer E. J., Newman B., Quesenberry C. P., Jr, Selby J. V. Usual dietary fat intake and insulin concentrations in healthy women twins. Diabetes Care. 1993 Nov;16(11):1459–1469. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.11.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Moser K. A., Pugh H. S., Goldblatt P. O. Inequalities in women's health: looking at mortality differentials using an alternative approach. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 30;296(6631):1221–1224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6631.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Selby J. V., Newman B., King M. C., Friedman G. D. Environmental and behavioral determinants of fasting plasma glucose in women. A matched co-twin analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;125(6):979–988. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wright E. O. The class analysis of poverty. Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(1):85–100. doi: 10.2190/WYRM-630N-8M6V-7851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zeger S. L., Liang K. Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES