Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1999 Feb;53(2):118–124. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.118

Is follow up by specialists routinely needed after elective surgery? A controlled trial

J Bailey, M Roland, C Roberts
PMCID: PMC1756834  PMID: 10396473

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of planned specialist follow up appointments after elective inpatient surgery. DESIGN: This was a controlled trial, using repeated alternate allocation of time periods to the two study groups. Group 1: Planned outpatient follow up 6-12 weeks after surgery. Group 2: No planned follow up: additional written information for patients and general practitioners. SETTING: A district general hospital in the north west of England. PARTICIPANTS: 264 patients listed for one of: transurethral resection of the prostate, varicose vein surgery, cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic), inguinal herniorraphy (open or laparoscopic). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status, complications, return to normal activity, patient satisfaction, use and costs of primary and secondary care in the 12 weeks after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: Data were available for 212 (80%) of eligible patients. Thirty eight per cent of patients in the "no planned follow up" group were in fact seen in outpatients after their discharge. Intention to treat analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the groups for health status, complications, or time to return to normal activity. Patients in the "no planned follow up" group had significantly fewer hospital visits and costs (mean difference in visits 0.51, 95% confidence intervals 0.39 to 0.69; mean difference in hospital costs 12.75 Pounds, 9.75 Pounds to 15.50 Pounds). There were fewer primary care staff contacts and costs in the "no planned follow up" group, although this difference was not significant (mean difference = 0.61 visits, -0.13 to 1.33 visits; primary care costs difference 8.37 Pounds, -1.31 Pounds to 18.73 Pounds). Patients in the "no planned follow up group" had significantly reduced patient travel costs (mean difference 4.84 Pounds, 3.44 Pounds to 6.22 Pounds). Eighty nine (42%) patients would prefer to be followed up by both their hospital doctor and GP; 53 (25%) patients would prefer to be followed up by the hospital doctor only. There were no significant differences between the two groups in their preferences for follow up. The majority of GPs agreed with the statement that a policy of no follow up at hospital outpatients for each of the six surgical procedures would increase their workload. CONCLUSIONS: Planned outpatient appointments after uncomplicated surgery seem to be neither necessary nor cost effective. A policy of "no planned follow up" results in no increase in primary care costs, and savings in hospital and patient costs. However, many patients expected and wanted to be seen again by their surgeon and GPs were concerned that a "no follow up" policy would result in an increase in workload.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. C., Bristol J. B., Poskitt K. R. Surgical discharge summaries: improving the record. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Mar;75(2):96–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey I. S., Karran S. E., Toyn K., Brough P., Ranaboldo C., Karran S. J. Community surveillance of complications after hernia surgery. BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):469–471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyce D. E., Crosby D. L., Shandall A. A. Aspects of hernia surgery in Wales. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 May;77(3):198–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brough R. J., Pidd H., O'Flynn K. J., Payne S. R. Identification of patients requiring out-patient follow-up after transurethral prostatectomy: is there a role for nurse-led screening of post-operative outcomes by telephone? Br J Urol. 1996 Sep;78(3):401–404. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.00087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards M. H. Satisfying patients' needs for surgical information. Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):463–465. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Faulkner A. C., Harvey I. M., Peters T. J., Sharp D. J., Frankel S. J. Profiling outpatient workload: practice variations between consultant firms and hospitals in south west England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):310–314. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Florey C. V., Yule B., Fogg A., Napier A., Orbell S., Cuschieri A. A randomized trial of immediate discharge of surgical patients to general practice. J Public Health Med. 1994 Dec;16(4):455–464. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koulack J., Fitzgerald P., Gillis D. A., Giacomantonio M. Routine inguinal hernia repair in the pediatric population: is office follow-up necessary? J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Sep;28(9):1185–1187. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(93)90161-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lester J. P. Why not reclaim our patients from hospital outpatient clinics? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Apr;30(213):230–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loudon I. S. A question of numbers. Lancet. 1976 Apr 3;1(7962):736–737. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)93104-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marsh G. N. Are follow-up consultations at medical outpatient departments futile? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1176–1177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCormack T. T., Collier J. A., Abel P. D., Collins C. D., Ritchie W. N. Attitudes to follow-up after uncomplicated surgery--hospital out-patients or general practitioner? Health Trends. 1984 May;16(2):46–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meredith P., Emberton M., Wood C., Smith J. Comparison of patients' needs for information on prostate surgery with printed materials provided by surgeons. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):18–23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Brien T. S., Perkins J. M., Cranston D. Efficiency in the outpatient department: the lessons from urology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Jul;77(4):287–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pedersen L. L., Leese B. What will a primary care led NHS mean for GP workload? The problem of the lack of an evidence base. BMJ. 1997 May 3;314(7090):1337–1341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perkins J. M., O'Brien T. S., Hanbury D. C., Cranston D. W. Is follow-up necessary after transurethral resection of the prostate? Br J Urol. 1995 May;75(5):618–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reeve H., Baxter K., Newton P., Burkey Y., Black M., Roland M. Long-term follow-up in outpatient clinics. 1: The view from general practice. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):24–28. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sandler D. A., Heaton C., Garner S. T., Mitchell J. R. Patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction with information given on discharge from hospital: audit of a new information card. BMJ. 1989 Dec 16;299(6714):1511–1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6714.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715–1726. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Temple J. General practice follow-up of patients discharged from hospital. Practitioner. 1988 Feb 8;232(1442):148, 150-2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waghorn A., McKee M., Thompson J. Surgical outpatients: challenges and responses. Br J Surg. 1997 Mar;84(3):300–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES