Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate a range of dietary assessment instruments in general practice. METHODS: Using a randomised block design, brief assessment instruments and more complex conventional dietary assessment tools were compared with an accepted "relative" standard--a seven day weighed dietary record. The standard was checked using biomarkers, and by performing test-retest reliability in additional subjects (n = 29). OUTCOMES: Agreement with weighed record. Percentage agreement with weighed record, rank correlation from scatter plot, rank correlation from Bland-Altman plot. Reliability of the weighed record. SETTING: Practice nurse treatment room in a single suburban general practice. SUBJECTS: Patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease (n = 61) or age/sex stratified general population group (n = 50). RESULTS: Brief self completion dietary assessment tools based on food groups caten during a week show reasonable agreement with the relative standard. For % energy from fat and saturated fat, non-starch polysaccharide, grams of fruit and vegetables and starchy foods consumed the range of agreement with the standard was: median % difference -6% to 12%, rank correlation 0.5 to 0.6. This agreement is of a similar order to the reliability of the weighed record, as good as or better than test standard agreement for more time consuming instruments, and compares favourably with research instruments validated in other settings. Under-reporting of energy intake was common (40%) and more likely if subjects were obese (body mass idex (BMI) > or = 30 60% under-reported; BMI < 30 29%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Under-reporting of absolute energy intake is common, particularly among obese patients. Simple self assessment tools based on food groups, designed for practice nurse dietary assessment, show acceptable agreement with a standard, and suggest such tools are sufficiently accurate for clinical work, research, and possibly population dietary monitoring.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bingham S. A., Gill C., Welch A., Day K., Cassidy A., Khaw K. T., Sneyd M. J., Key T. J., Roe L., Day N. E. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr. 1994 Oct;72(4):619–643. doi: 10.1079/bjn19940064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bingham S. A. Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. Ann Nutr Metab. 1991;35(3):117–127. doi: 10.1159/000177635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calnan M., Cant S., Williams S., Killoran A. Involvement of the primary health care team in coronary heart disease prevention. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 May;44(382):224–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drayer J. I., Weber M. A., DeYoung J. L., Wyle F. A. Circadian blood pressure patterns in ambulatory hypertensive patients: effects of age. Am J Med. 1982 Oct;73(4):493–499. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90327-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg G. R., Black A. E., Jebb S. A., Cole T. J., Murgatroyd P. R., Coward W. A., Prentice A. M. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Dec;45(12):569–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little P., Margetts B. Dietary and exercise assessment in general practice. Fam Pract. 1996 Oct;13(5):477–482. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.5.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livingstone M. B., Prentice A. M., Strain J. J., Coward W. A., Black A. E., Barker M. E., McKenna P. G., Whitehead R. G. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. BMJ. 1990 Mar 17;300(6726):708–712. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margetts B. M., Cade J. E., Osmond C. Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a diet record. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;18(4):868–873. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.4.868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neil H. A., Roe L., Godlee R. J., Moore J. W., Clark G. M., Brown J., Thorogood M., Stratton I. M., Lancaster T., Mant D. Randomised trial of lipid lowering dietary advice in general practice: the effects on serum lipids, lipoproteins, and antioxidants. BMJ. 1995 Mar 4;310(6979):569–573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6979.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roe L., Strong C., Whiteside C., Neil A., Mant D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):375–381. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ross F. M., Bower P. J., Sibbald B. S. Practice nurses: characteristics, workload and training needs. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):15–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruddy M. C., Bialy G. B., Malka E. S., Lacy C. R., Kostis J. B. The relationship of plasma renin activity to clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in elderly people with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl. 1988 Dec;6(4):S412–S415. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198812040-00129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wonderling D., Langham S., Buxton M., Normand C., McDermott C. What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1274–1278. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]