Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1999 Apr;53(4):204–210. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.4.204

Suicide, religion, and socioeconomic conditions. An ecological study in 26 countries, 1990

J Neeleman, G Lewis
PMCID: PMC1756856  PMID: 10396545

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Relative risks are frequently assumed to be stable across populations but this may not apply in psychiatric epidemiology where sociocultural context may modify them. Such ecological effect modification will give curved associations between aggregated risk factor and outcome. This was examined in connection with the ecological association between suicide rates and an aggregate index of religiosity. DESIGN: Ecological study of associations between suicide rates and an index of religiosity, adjusted for socioeconomic variation. The effect of stratification of the study sample according to levels of religiosity, was examined. SETTING: 26 European and American countries. SUBJECTS: Interview data from 37,688 people aggregated by country. OUTCOME MEASURES: Age and sex specific (1986- 1990) suicide rates. MAIN RESULT: Adjusted for socioeconomic variation, negative associations of male suicide rates with religiosity were apparent in the 13 least religious countries only (test for interaction F (1, 25) = 5.6; p = 0.026). Associations between religiosity and female suicide rates did not vary across countries. CONCLUSION: The bent ecological association was apparent only after adjustment for socioeconomic variation suggesting that, rather than confounding, ecological modification of individual level links between religion and male (but not female) suicide risk is the responsible mechanism. This concurs with micro-level findings suggesting that suicide acceptance depends not only on personal but also on contextual levels of religious belief, and that men are more sensitive to this phenomenon than women. In psychiatric epidemiology, relative risks vary with the exposure's prevalence. This has important implications for research and prevention.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beral V., Chilvers C., Fraser P. On the estimation of relative risk from vital statistical data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Jun;33(2):159–162. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borges G., Anthony J. C., Garrison C. Z. Methodological issues relevant to epidemiologic investigations of suicidal behaviors of adolescents. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):228–239. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breault K. D. Suicide in America: a test of Durkheim's theory of religious and family integration, 1933-1980. AJS. 1986 Nov;92(3):628–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown G. W., Prudo R. Psychiatric disorder in a rural and an urban population: 1. Aetiology of depression. Psychol Med. 1981 Aug;11(3):581–599. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700052880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brugha T. S., Bebbington P. E., MacCarthy B., Sturt E., Wykes T., Potter J. Gender, social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study. Psychol Med. 1990 Feb;20(1):147–156. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700013325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crombie I. K. Trends in suicide and unemployment in Scotland, 1976-86. BMJ. 1989 Mar 25;298(6676):782–784. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deavoll B. J., Mulder R. T., Beautrais A. L., Joyce P. R. One hundred years of suicide in New Zealand. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Feb;87(2):81–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diekstra R. F. Suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults: the international picture. Crisis. 1989 Apr;10(1):16–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenland S., Morgenstern H. Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):269–274. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenland S., Schlesselman J. J., Criqui M. H. The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;123(2):203–208. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gunnell D., Frankel S. Prevention of suicide: aspirations and evidence. BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1227–1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Halpern D. Minorities and mental health. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Mar;36(5):597–607. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90056-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kasl S. V. Mortality and the business cycle: some questions about research strategies when utilizing macro-social and ecological data. Am J Public Health. 1979 Aug;69(8):784–788. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.8.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. La Vecchia C., Lucchini F., Levi F. Worldwide trends in suicide mortality, 1955-1989. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Jul;90(1):53–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leenstra A. S., Ormel J., Giel R. Positive life change and recovery from depression and anxiety. A three-stage longitudinal study of primary care attenders. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;166(3):333–343. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.3.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levin J. S., Vanderpool H. Y. Is religion therapeutically significant for hypertension? Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(1):69–78. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90129-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lewis G., Hawton K., Jones P. Strategies for preventing suicide. Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;171:351–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Neeleman J., Halpern D., Leon D., Lewis G. Tolerance of suicide, religion and suicide rates: an ecological and individual study in 19 Western countries. Psychol Med. 1997 Sep;27(5):1165–1171. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797005357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neeleman J. Regional suicide rates in the Netherlands: does religion still play a role? Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;27(3):466–472. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.3.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neeleman J., Wessely S. Changes in classification of suicide in England and Wales: time trends and associations with coroners' professional backgrounds. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):467–472. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Norström T. Alcohol and suicide: a comparative analysis of France and Sweden. Addiction. 1995 Nov;90(11):1463–1469. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.901114634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Platt S., Kreitman N. Trends in parasuicide and unemployment among men in Edinburgh, 1968-82. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 20;289(6451):1029–1032. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6451.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pritchard C. New patterns of suicide by age and gender in the United Kingdom and the Western World 1974-1992; an indicator of social change? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;31(3-4):227–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00785772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stack S. The effect of religious commitment on suicide: a cross-national analysis. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):362–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Trovato F. A Durkheimian analysis of youth suicide: Canada, 1971 and 1981. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1992 Winter;22(4):413–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang B., Lester D. Time-series analyses of the American suicide rate. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;25(5):274–275. doi: 10.1007/BF00788649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zuckerman D. M., Kasl S. V., Ostfeld A. M. Psychosocial predictors of mortality among the elderly poor. The role of religion, well-being, and social contacts. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):410–423. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES