Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Dec;56(12):935–942. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.12.935

Neighbourhood socioeconomic context and self reported health and smoking: a secondary analysis of data on seven cities

S Reijneveld 1
PMCID: PMC1757003  PMID: 12461115

Abstract

Objective: Many studies have shown that poor health status and harmful health behaviour occur more frequently in deprived neighbourhoods. Most studies show modest associations between area level socioeconomic factors, the neighbourhood context, and health outcomes. However, estimates for the contextual effects vary. It is unclear if this variation is attributable to differences in methodology. This study examines whether contextual neighbourhood differences in health outcomes really vary between cities or that differences in methodology may account for these differences.

Design: Secondary analysis of data from health interview surveys in seven large Dutch cities in the 1990s comprising 23 269 residents of 484 neighbourhoods, using multilevel logistic models.

Setting: General population aged 16 and over.

Main outcome measures: Self reported health, smoking of cigarettes.

Main results: The socioeconomic context of neighbourhoods is associated with health outcomes in all large Dutch cities. The strength of the association varies between cities, but variation is much smaller in the age group 25–64. Furthermore, neighbourhood differences vary in size between native and other residents. Contextual neighbourhood differences are about two times larger for self reported health than for the smoking of cigarettes, but for native Dutch people they are of similar size.

Conclusions: A comparatively large improvement in health may be gained in deprived neighbourhoods, because of the poorer health status to which the context of these neighbourhoods also contributes. Health promoting interventions should be aimed at the residents and at the context of deprived neighbourhoods, taking differences between ethnic groups and age groups into account.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (230.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K., Muller M., Cohen P. D., Essink-Bot M. L., Fekkes M., Sanderman R., Sprangers M. A., te Velde A., Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavelaars A. E., Kunst A. E., Geurts J. J., Crialesi R., Grötvedt L., Helmert U., Lahelma E., Lundberg O., Matheson J., Mielck A. Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1102–1107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crampton P., Salmond C., Woodward A., Reid P. Socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity are both important for anti-tobacco health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Jun;27(3):317–327. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diez-Roux A. V., Link B. G., Northridge M. E. A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(5):673–687. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00320-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diez-Roux A. V., Nieto F. J., Caulfield L., Tyroler H. A., Watson R. L., Szklo M. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):55–63. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellaway A., Macintyre S. Does housing tenure predict health in the UK because it exposes people to different levels of housing related hazards in the home or its surroundings? Health Place. 1998 Jun;4(2):141–150. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(98)00006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans J., Hyndman S., Stewart-Brown S., Smith D., Petersen S. An epidemiological study of the relative importance of damp housing in relation to adult health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Sep;54(9):677–686. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.9.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gandek B., Ware J. E., Aaronson N. K., Apolone G., Bjorner J. B., Brazier J. E., Bullinger M., Kaasa S., Leplege A., Prieto L. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geronimus A. T. To mitigate, resist, or undo: addressing structural influences on the health of urban populations. Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):867–872. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kawachi I., Kennedy B. P., Glass R. Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1187–1193. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leviton L. C., Snell E., McGinnis M. Urban issues in health promotion strategies. Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):863–866. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macintyre S., Hiscock R., Kearns A., Ellaway A. Housing tenure and car access: further exploration of the nature of their relations with health in a UK setting. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):330–331. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mackenbach J. P., Kunst A. E., Cavelaars A. E., Groenhof F., Geurts J. J. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655–1659. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07226-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malmström M., Sundquist J., Johansson S. E. Neighborhood environment and self-reported health status: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1181–1186. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Matte T. D., Jacobs D. E. Housing and health--current issues and implications for research and programs. J Urban Health. 2000 Mar;77(1):7–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02350959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pickett K. E., Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111–122. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reijneveld S. A. Explanations for differences in health outcomes between neighbourhoods of varying socioeconomic level. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Nov;55(11):847–847. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.11.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reijneveld S. A. Reported health, lifestyles, and use of health care of first generation immigrants in The Netherlands: do socioeconomic factors explain their adverse position? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):298–304. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reijneveld S. A., Schene A. H. Higher prevalence of mental disorders in socioeconomically deprived urban areas in The Netherlands: community or personal disadvantage? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jan;52(1):2–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reijneveld S. A., Stronks K. The impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization in a metropolitan area: the use of administrative data. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;28(6):1134–1140. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.6.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reijneveld S. A. The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;27(1):33–40. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reijneveld S. A., Verheij R. A., de Bakker D. H. The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Apr;54(4):306–313. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.4.306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sundquist J., Malmström M., Johansson S. E. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):841–845. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.5.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Verheij R. A., De Bakker D. H., Reijneveld S. A. GP income in relation to workload in deprived urban areas in The Netherlands. Before and after the 1996 pay review. Eur J Public Health. 2001 Sep;11(3):264–266. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wing S. Social inequalities in the decline of coronary mortality. Am J Public Health. 1988 Nov;78(11):1415–1416. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Herten L. M., Reijneveld S. A., Gunning-Schepers L. J. Rationalising chances of success in intersectoral health policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):342–347. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES