Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available non-invasive tests (spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA), time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and colour Doppler ultrasound (DUS)), individually and together, compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with symptomatic tight carotid stenosis; and to assess the effect of substituting non-invasive tests for DSA on outcome, interobserver variability, and patient preference.
Methods: Patients referred from a neurovascular clinic were subjected prospectively to DUS imaging. The operator was blind to symptoms. Patients with a tight carotid stenosis on the symptomatic side were admitted for DSA. CTA and MRA were performed during the admission. The CTA, MRA, and DSA films were each read independently by two of six experienced radiologists, blind to all other data.
Results: 67 patients were included (34 had all four imaging procedures). DUS, CTA, and MRA all agreed with DSA in the diagnosis of operable v non-operable disease in about 80% of patients. CTA tended to underestimate (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 1.0), MRA to overestimate (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.57), and DUS to agree most closely with (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.71) the degree of stenosis as shown by DSA. When using any two of the three non-invasive tests in combination, adding the third if the first two disagreed would result in very few misdiagnoses (about 6%). MRA had similar interobserver variability to CTA (both worse than DSA). Patients preferred CTA over MRA and DSA.
Conclusions: DUS, CTA, and MRA all show similar accuracy in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis. No technique on its own is accurate enough to replace DSA. Two non-invasive techniques in combination, and adding a third if the first two disagree, appears more accurate, but may still result in diagnostic errors.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (168.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson C. M., Lee R. E., Levin D. L., de la Torre Alonso S., Saloner D. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms. Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):219–226. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blakeley D. D., Oddone E. Z., Hasselblad V., Simel D. L., Matchar D. B. Noninvasive carotid artery testing. A meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):360–367. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies K. N., Humphrey P. R. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;56(9):967–972. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.9.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dippel D. W., van Kooten F., Bakker S. L., Koudstaal P. J. Interobserver agreement for 10% categories of angiographic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2483–2485. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kallmes D. F., Omary R. A., Dix J. E., Evans A. J., Hillman B. J. Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test of carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Sep;17(8):1501–1506. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korosec F. R., Turski P. A., Carroll T. J., Mistretta C. A., Grist T. M. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Sep;10(3):317–325. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199909)10:3<317::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Link J., Brossmann J., Grabener M., Mueller-Huelsbeck S., Steffens J. C., Brinkmann G., Heller M. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Jan;17(1):89–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mead G. E., Lewis S. C., Wardlaw J. M. Variability in Doppler ultrasound influences referral of patients for carotid surgery. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000 Dec;12(2):137–143. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(00)00111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothwell P. M., Gibson R. J., Slattery J., Sellar R. J., Warlow C. P. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994 Dec;25(12):2435–2439. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.12.2435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothwell P. M., Pendlebury S. T., Wardlaw J., Warlow C. P. Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1444–1450. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sameshima T., Futami S., Morita Y., Yokogami K., Miyahara S., Sameshima Y., Goya T., Wakisaka S. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surg Neurol. 1999 Mar;51(3):301–309. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sostman H. D., Beam C. A. Evaluation of the quality of clinical research studies of magnetic resonance angiography: 1991-1994. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):33–38. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880060107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young G. R., Sandercock P. A., Slattery J., Humphrey P. R., Smith E. T., Brock L. Observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms and the risk of inappropriate decisions about carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Feb;60(2):152–157. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.2.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]