Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Oct;74(10):1423–1428. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.10.1423

"Bottom-up" and "top-down" effects on reading saccades: a case study

N Upton 1, T Hodgson 1, G Plant 1, R Wise 1, A Leff 1
PMCID: PMC1757385  PMID: 14570838

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role right foveal/parafoveal sparing plays in reading single words, word arrays, and eye movement patterns in a single case with an incongruous hemianopia.

Methods: The patient, a 48 year old right handed male with a macular sparing hemianopia in his left eye and a macular splitting hemianopia in his right eye, performed various reading tasks. Single word reading speeds were monitored using a "voice-trigger" system. Eye movements were recorded while reading three passages of text, and PET data were gathered while the subject performed a variety of reading tasks in the camera.

Results: The patient was faster at reading single words and text with his left eye compared with his right. A small word length effect was present in his right eye but not his left. His eye movement patterns were more orderly when reading text with his left eye, making fewer saccades. The PET data provided evidence of "top-down" processes involved in reading. Binocular single word reading produced activity in the representation of foveal V1 bilaterally; however, text reading with the left eye only was associated with activation in left but not right parafoveal V1, despite there being visual stimuli in both visual fields.

Conclusions: The presence of a word length effect (typically associated with pure alexia) can be caused by a macular splitting hemianopia. Right parafoveal vision is not critically involved in single word identification, but is when planning left to right reading saccades. The influence of top-down attentional processes during text reading can be visualised in parafoveal V1 using PET.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (782.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azzopardi P., Cowey A. Preferential representation of the fovea in the primary visual cortex. Nature. 1993 Feb 25;361(6414):719–721. doi: 10.1038/361719a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brefczynski J. A., DeYoe E. A. A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Apr;2(4):370–374. doi: 10.1038/7280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brett M., Leff A. P., Rorden C., Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001 Aug;14(2):486–500. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowey A., Rolls E. T. Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Exp Brain Res. 1974;21(5):447–454. doi: 10.1007/BF00237163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faust M., Babkoff H., Kravetz S. Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):171–192. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fox P. T., Mintun M. A., Raichle M. E., Miezin F. M., Allman J. M., Van Essen D. C. Mapping human visual cortex with positron emission tomography. 1986 Oct 30-Nov 5Nature. 323(6091):806–809. doi: 10.1038/323806a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horton J. C., Hoyt W. F. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun;109(6):816–824. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080060080030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 May;53(2):429–455. doi: 10.1080/713755901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1970;33:193–201. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwong K. K., Belliveau J. W., Chesler D. A., Goldberg I. E., Weisskoff R. M., Poncelet B. P., Kennedy D. N., Hoppel B. E., Cohen M. S., Turner R. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5675–5679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lavigne F., Vitu F., d'Ydewalle G. The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2000 May;104(2):191–214. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leff A. P., Crewes H., Plant G. T., Scott S. K., Kennard C., Wise R. J. The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. Brain. 2001 Mar;124(Pt 3):510–521. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.3.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leff A. P., Scott S. K., Crewes H., Hodgson T. L., Cowey A., Howard D., Wise R. J. Impaired reading in patients with right hemianopia. Ann Neurol. 2000 Feb;47(2):171–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McConkie G. W., Kerr P. W., Reddix M. D., Zola D. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Res. 1988;28(10):1107–1118. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morrison R. E. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):667–682. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nazir T. A., Heller D., Sussmann C. Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Sep;52(3):315–328. doi: 10.3758/bf03209148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nicholls M. E., Clode D. A failure to produce a left hemisphere advantage through verbal priming. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Sep;34(9):893–904. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pollatsek A., Bolozky S., Well A. D., Rayner K. Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain Lang. 1981 Sep;14(1):174–180. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90073-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Posner M. I. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rayner K., McConkie G. W. What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Res. 1976;16(8):829–837. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rayner K., Well A. D., Pollatsek A. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Jun;27(6):537–544. doi: 10.3758/bf03198682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reichle E. D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D. L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):125–157. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rovamo J., Virsu V., Näsänen R. Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature. 1978 Jan 5;271(5640):54–56. doi: 10.1038/271054a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sereno M. I., Dale A. M., Reppas J. B., Kwong K. K., Belliveau J. W., Brady T. J., Rosen B. R., Tootell R. B. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889–893. doi: 10.1126/science.7754376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spinks T. J., Jones T., Bloomfield P. M., Bailey D. L., Miller M., Hogg D., Jones W. F., Vaigneur K., Reed J., Young J. Physical characteristics of the ECAT EXACT3D positron tomograph. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Sep;45(9):2601–2618. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/9/313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vitu F., O'Regan J. K., Mittau M. Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jun;47(6):583–600. doi: 10.3758/bf03203111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Warrington E. K., James M., Maciejewski C. The WAIS as a lateralizing and localizing diagnostic instrument: a study of 656 patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(2):223–239. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Warrington E. K., Shallice T. Word-form dyslexia. Brain. 1980 Mar;103(1):99–112. doi: 10.1093/brain/103.1.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Watanabe T., Sasaki Y., Miyauchi S., Putz B., Fujimaki N., Nielsen M., Takino R., Miyakawa S. Attention-regulated activity in human primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):2218–2221. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.2218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES