Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Jan;75(1):49–55.

The influence of limb crossing on left tactile extinction

P Bartolomeo 1, R Perri 1, G Gainotti 1
PMCID: PMC1757496  PMID: 14707307

Abstract

Background: Previous research on patients with left tactile extinction has shown that crossing of hands, so that each hand is on the opposite side of the body midline relative to the other, improves detection of stimuli given to the left hand.

Objectives: To study the influence of the spatial position of limbs on left tactile extinction, and its relations with left visual neglect.

Methods: Normal participants and patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage and left tactile extinction were asked to detect single or double light touch stimuli applied to their cheeks, hands, or knees with their arm and legs either in anatomical or in crossed position, increasing the attentional load of the task.

Results: In patients with left extinction, limb crossing caused a deterioration in performance for stimuli applied to right body parts, with only a tendency to an improvement in detection for left body parts (only two of 24 patients showed substantial (>20%) improvement in left extinction after limb crossing). After crossing, left limb detections of double stimuli decreased with increasing degrees of visual neglect.

Conclusions: In conditions of high attentional load, limb crossing may impair tactile detection in most patients with left extinction, and particularly in those showing signs of left visual neglect. These results underline the importance of general attentional capacity in determining tactile extinction. Attentional and somatotopic mechanisms of extinction may assume different weights in different patients.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (280.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aglioti S., Smania N., Peru A. Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Jan;11(1):67–79. doi: 10.1162/089892999563256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert M. L. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology. 1973 Jun;23(6):658–664. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.6.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartolomeo P., Chokron S. Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial bias after right hemisphere lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jul;37(8):881–894. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00150-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartolomeo P., Chokron S. Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention? Neurology. 1999 Dec 10;53(9):2023–2027. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartolomeo P., D'Erme P., Gainotti G. The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect. Neurology. 1994 Sep;44(9):1710–1714. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.9.1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belin Pascal, McAdams Stephen, Thivard Lionel, Smith Bennett, Savel Sophie, Zilbovicius Monica, Samson Séverine, Samson Yves. The neuroanatomical substrate of sound duration discrimination. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):1956–1964. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bellas D. N., Novelly R. A., Eskenazi B., Wasserstein J. The nature of unilateral neglect in the olfactory sensory system. Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Binder J., Marshall R., Lazar R., Benjamin J., Mohr J. P. Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Arch Neurol. 1992 Nov;49(11):1187–1194. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530350109026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bisiach E., Perani D., Vallar G., Berti A. Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(6):759–767. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Colby C. L., Goldberg M. E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:319–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. D'Erme P., Robertson I., Bartolomeo P., Daniele A., Gainotti G. Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Nov;30(11):989–1000. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90050-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Renzi E., Gentilini M., Pattacini F. Auditory extinction following hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(6):733–744. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Di Pellegrino G., De Renzi E. An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Feb;33(2):153–170. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferber S., Karnath H. O. How to assess spatial neglect--line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Oct;23(5):599–607. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.5.599.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gainotti G., Caltagirone C., Lemmo M. A., Miceli G. Pattern of ipsilateral clinical extinction in brain-damaged patients. Appl Neurophysiol. 1975;38(2):115–125. doi: 10.1159/000102652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gainotti G., D'Erme P., Bartolomeo P. Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;54(12):1082–1089. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.12.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gainotti G., D'Erme P., Monteleone D., Silveri M. C. Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Brain. 1986 Aug;109(Pt 4):599–612. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C., Hunt M., Wade D. T. Somatosensory assessment: can seeing produce feeling? J Neurol. 1997 Mar;244(3):199–203. doi: 10.1007/s004150050073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C. Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex. 1992 Dec;28(4):525–535. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80225-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hashimoto I. Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. Ann Neurol. 1988 Apr;23(4):332–338. doi: 10.1002/ana.410230404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heldmann B., Kerkhoff G., Struppler A., Havel P., Jahn T. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation alleviates tactile extinction. Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3193–3198. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009280-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Husain M., Shapiro K., Martin J., Kennard C. Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature. 1997 Jan 9;385(6612):154–156. doi: 10.1038/385154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Larmande P., Cambier J. Influence de l'état d'activation hémisphérique sur le phénomène d'extinction sensitive chez 10 patients atteints de lésions hémisphériques droites. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1981;137(4):285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Làdavas E., di Pellegrino G., Farnè A., Zeloni G. Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):581–589. doi: 10.1162/089892998562988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mattingley J. B., Driver J., Beschin N., Robertson I. H. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):867–880. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGlinchey-Berroth R., Bullis D. P., Milberg W. P., Verfaellie M., Alexander M., D'Esposito M. Assessment of neglect reveals dissociable behavioral but not neuroanatomical subtypes. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Sep;2(5):441–451. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700001521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meador K. J., Loring D. W., Lee G. P., Brooks B. S., Thompson E. E., Thompson W. O., Heilman K. M. Right cerebral specialization for tactile attention as evidenced by intracarotid sodium amytal. Neurology. 1988 Nov;38(11):1763–1766. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.11.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Robertson I. H. Do we need the "lateral" in unilateral neglect? Spatially nonselective attention deficits in unilateral neglect and their implications for rehabilitation. Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S85–S90. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robertson I. H., Mattingley J. B., Rorden C., Driver J. Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness. Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):169–172. doi: 10.1038/25993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smania N., Aglioti S. Sensory and spatial components of somaesthetic deficits following right brain damage. Neurology. 1995 Sep;45(9):1725–1730. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.9.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaishnavi S., Calhoun J., Chatterjee A. Binding personal and peripersonal space: evidence from tactile extinction. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):181–189. doi: 10.1162/089892901564243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vallar G., Rusconi M. L., Bignamini L., Geminiani G., Perani D. Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Apr;57(4):464–470. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.4.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. di Pellegrino G., Làdavas E., Farné A. Seeing where your hands are. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):730–730. doi: 10.1038/41921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES