Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1998 Feb;55(2):132–137. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.2.132

Influence of biological and analytical variation on urine measurements for monitoring exposure to cadmium

H J Mason, N R Williams, M G Morgan, A J Stevenson, S Armitage
PMCID: PMC1757554  PMID: 9614399

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the mean intraindividual biological variation in urinary concentrations of cadmium and retinol binding protein (RBP) in untimed, random urine samples and the influence of creatinine or specific gravity correction on reducing this variation. The relation between biological variation and analytical variation in defining uncertainty in a single measurement and significant differences between successive measurements was explored. METHODS: Repeat measurement study in subjects with either high historical exposure to cadmium but without current exposure, or unexposed volunteers. Standard statistical tools used in clinical laboratory medicine were applied to define intraindividual biological and analytical variation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Both creatinine and specific gravity correction of urinary cadmium measurements in random urine samples seem to reduce the intraindividual variability compared with uncorrected values. With a standard definition, acceptable long term analytical precision for measurements of cadmium and RBP combined with creatinine analyses should be < 9% and < 15% respectively. The mean intraindividual biological variation of cadmium and RBP, expressed as creatinine corrected, was 18% and 40% respectively in the subjects exposed to cadmium. With the analytical precision used, significant differences (p < 0.05) between consecutive measurements for creatinine corrected urinary cadmium and RBP would need to show changes of > 54% and > 110% respectively. The relation between significant differences in consecutive results and differences in the analytical precision of the method used to measure the samples is described.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alessio L., Apostoli P., Forni A., Toffoletto F. Biological monitoring of cadmium exposure--an Italian experience. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993;19 (Suppl 1):27–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin A., Alessio L., Sesana G., Dell'Orto A., Ghezzi I. Problems concerning the usefulness of adjustment of urinary cadmium for creatinine and specific gravity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1985;55(2):107–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00378372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeniger M. F., Lowry L. K., Rosenberg J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Oct;54(10):615–627. doi: 10.1080/15298669391355134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis K. J., Cohn S. H., Smith T. J. Cadmium inhalation exposure estimates: their significance with respect to kidney and liver cadmium burden. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1985;15(1):173–187. doi: 10.1080/15287398509530644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser C. G., Harris E. K. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1989;27(5):409–437. doi: 10.3109/10408368909106595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenberg G. N., Levine R. J. Urinary creatinine excretion is not stable: a new method for assessing urinary toxic substance concentrations. J Occup Med. 1989 Oct;31(10):832–838. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198910000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kjellström T., Nordberg G. F. A kinetic model of cadmium metabolism in the human being. Environ Res. 1978 Jul;16(1-3):248–269. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(78)90160-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lauwerys R. R., Bernard A. M., Buchet J. P., Roels H. A. Assessment of the health impact of environmental exposure to cadmium: contribution of the epidemiologic studies carried out in Belgium. Environ Res. 1993 Aug;62(2):200–206. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lauwerys R., Roels H., Regniers M., Buchet J. P., Bernard A., Goret A. Significance of cadmium concentration in blood and in urine in workers exposed to cadmium. Environ Res. 1979 Dec;20(2):375–391. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(79)90014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason H. J., Calder I. M. The correction of urinary mercury concentrations in untimed, random samples. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Apr;51(4):287–287. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.4.287-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roels H. A., Lauwerys R. R., Buchet J. P., Bernard A. M., Vos A., Oversteyns M. Health significance of cadmium induced renal dysfunction: a five year follow up. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Nov;46(11):755–764. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.11.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Trevisan A., Nicoletto G., Maso S., Grandesso G., Odynets A., Secondin L. Biological monitoring of cadmium exposure: reliability of spot urine samples. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1994;65(6):373–375. doi: 10.1007/BF00383246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES