Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1998 Feb;55(2):91–98. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.2.91

Socioeconomic and sex differentials in reason for sickness absence from the Whitehall II Study

A Feeney, F North, J Head, R Canner, M Marmot
PMCID: PMC1757555  PMID: 9614392

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Large socioeconomic differences exist in disease and mortality. This paper describes the distribution of specific medical reasons for sickness absence by grade of employment in the Whitehall II study and validates the medical reason by comparison with general practitioners' records. METHODS: Analysis of sickness absence data on 5620 male and female civil servants aged 35-55 years. Data have been collected from 12 of the 20 London based civil service departments participating in the Whitehall II study, where medical reason for absence was available. Rates and distributions of reasons for absence for short spells (< or = 7 days) and long spells (> 7 days) were analysed. RESULTS: Respiratory disorders and gastroenteritis accounted for over half of all spells of absence, with headache and migraine, musculoskeletal disorders, injury, and neurosis accounting for a further 20%-30% of absences. There was an inverse association with employment grade, the lower the grade the higher the rate of absence for both short spells (< or = 7 days) and long spells (> 7 days). In general, women had higher rates of absence than men. Comparison of reason for very long spells of absence (> 21 days) showed moderate agreement between civil service and general practitioner. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of national comprehensive data on sickness absence and medical reason for absence, in particular for women and for spells of different duration. Data from the Whitehall II study show large employment grade and sex differences in the distribution of medical reasons for absence that are similar to socioeconomic differences in morbidity documented in other studies. Possible explanations include the subjective nature of illness and disease; the work/family interface; and the influence of the absence culture. Longer term follow up will provide information on whether sickness absence relates to serious morbidity and mortality.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderson M. R. Data on sickness absence in some recent publications of the Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1967 Jan;21(1):1–6. doi: 10.1136/jech.21.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourbonnais R., Vinet A., Vézina M., Gingras S. Certified sick leave as a non-specific morbidity indicator: a case-referent study among nurses. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Oct;49(10):673–678. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.10.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chevalier A., Luce D., Blanc C., Goldberg M. Sickness absence at the French National Electric and Gas Company. Br J Ind Med. 1987 Feb;44(2):101–110. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haldorsen E. M., Brage S., Johannesen T. S., Tellnes G., Ursin H. Musculoskeletal pain: concepts of disease, illness, and sickness certification in health professionals in Norway. Scand J Rheumatol. 1996;25(4):224–232. doi: 10.3109/03009749609069991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haynes R. B., Sackett D. L., Taylor D. W., Gibson E. S., Johnson A. L. Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 5;299(14):741–744. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810052991403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hibbard J. H., Pope C. R. Another look at sex differences in the use of medical care: illness orientation and the types of morbidities for which services are used. Women Health. 1986 Summer;11(2):21–36. doi: 10.1300/J013v11n02_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kristensen T. S. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90122-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Macintyre S., Hunt K., Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med. 1996 Feb;42(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marmot M. G., Smith G. D., Stansfeld S., Patel C., North F., Head J., White I., Brunner E., Feeney A. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1387–1393. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marmot M., Feeney A., Shipley M., North F., Syme S. L. Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Apr;49(2):124–130. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martikainen P. T. Unemployment and mortality among Finnish men, 1981-5. BMJ. 1990 Sep 1;301(6749):407–411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6749.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. North F., Syme S. L., Feeney A., Head J., Shipley M. J., Marmot M. G. Explaining socioeconomic differences in sickness absence: the Whitehall II Study. BMJ. 1993 Feb 6;306(6874):361–366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6874.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Popay J., Bartley M., Owen C. Gender inequalities in health: social position, affective disorders and minor physical morbidity. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jan;36(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90302-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Searle S. J. Sickness absence and duration of service in the Post Office 1982-3. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Jul;43(7):458–464. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.7.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Semmence A. Rising sickness absence in Great Britain--a general practitioner's view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 Mar;21(104):125–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Söderfeldt B., Danermark B., Larsson S. Social class and sickness absences. A comparative study of four ways to measure social class. Scand J Soc Med. 1987;15(4):211–217. doi: 10.1177/140349488701500402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Taylor P. J. Occupational and regional associations of death, disablement, and sickness absence among Post Office staff 1972-75. Br J Ind Med. 1976 Nov;33(4):230–235. doi: 10.1136/oem.33.4.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor P. Sickness absence: facts and misconceptions. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1974 Jul;8(4):315–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tellnes G., Bjerkedal T. Epidemiology of sickness certification--a methodological approach based on a study from Buskerud County in Norway. Scand J Soc Med. 1989;17(3):245–251. doi: 10.1177/140349488901700305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomson D. Sickness absence in the civil service. Proc R Soc Med. 1972 Jun;65(6):572–577. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Verbrugge L. M. Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav. 1985 Sep;26(3):156–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waldron I. Sex differences in illness incidence, prognosis and mortality: issues and evidence. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(16):1107–1123. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES