Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1998 Mar;55(3):145–149. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.3.145

Human effect monitoring in cases of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: a method comparison

S Kevekordes, T W Gebel, M Hellwig, W Dames, H Dunkelberg
PMCID: PMC1757560  PMID: 9624264

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether DNA damage increased in subjects possibly exposed to high amounts of antineoplastic agents. METHODS: The level of genetic damage was determined in peripheral mononuclear blood cells with the sister chromatid exchange test, the alkaline elution technique, and the cytokinesis block micronucleus test. RESULTS: The supposed increased exposure of the study subjects was caused by a malfunction of a safety hood resulting in leakage of air during preparation of an infusion of an antineoplastic drug. Two months after a new safety hood was installed, the frequencies of micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges of exposed nurses (n = 10) were still significantly increased when compared with a matched control group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, one sided Wilcoxon test, respectively). In a second examination seven months later, the frequency of micronuclei had significantly decreased to control values (p < 0.05, one sided Wilcoxon test, n = 6). Moreover, the study subjects who smoked (n = 8) had significantly increased frequencies of micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, one sided U test, respectively). No differences in the rate of DNA damage could be detected with the alkaline elution technique. CONCLUSIONS: Control measures on the level of biological effect should be performed regularly to ensure maximum safety precautions for workers potentially exposed to genotoxic agents.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anwar W. A., Salama S. I., el Serafy M. M., Hemida S. A., Hafez A. S. Chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus frequency in nurses occupationally exposed to cytotoxic drugs. Mutagenesis. 1994 Jul;9(4):315–317. doi: 10.1093/mutage/9.4.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arlett C. F., Ashby J., Fielder R. J., Scott D. Micronuclei: origins, applications and methodologies--a workshop sponsored by the Health and Safety Executive held in Manchester, May 23-25, 1988. Mutagenesis. 1989 Nov;4(6):482–485. doi: 10.1093/mutage/4.6.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOYUM A. SEPARATION OF WHITE BLOOD CELLS. Nature. 1964 Nov 21;204:793–794. doi: 10.1038/204793a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barale R., Sozzi G., Toniolo P., Borghi O., Reali D., Loprieno N., Della Porta G. Sister-chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes and mutagenicity in urine of nurses handling cytostatic drugs. Mutat Res. 1985 Aug-Sep;157(2-3):235–240. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(85)90121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benhamou S., Pot-Deprun J., Sancho-Garnier H., Chouroulinkov I. Sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic agents. Int J Cancer. 1988 Mar 15;41(3):350–353. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910410305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Giorgio C., De Méo M. P., Laget M., Guiraud H., Botta A., Duménil G. The micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes: screening for inter-individual variability and application to biomonitoring. Carcinogenesis. 1994 Feb;15(2):313–317. doi: 10.1093/carcin/15.2.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eastmond D. A., Tucker J. D. Identification of aneuploidy-inducing agents using cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes and an antikinetochore antibody. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1989;13(1):34–43. doi: 10.1002/em.2850130104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fenech M., Morley A. A. Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1985 Feb-Apr;147(1-2):29–36. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(85)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fenech M. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations. Mutat Res. 1993 Jan;285(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90049-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuchs J., Hengstler J. G., Jung D., Hiltl G., Konietzko J., Oesch F. DNA damage in nurses handling antineoplastic agents. Mutat Res. 1995 Mar;342(1-2):17–23. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gebel T., Kevekordes S., Schaefer J., von Platen H., Dunkelberg H. Assessment of a possible genotoxic environmental risk in sheep bred on grounds with strongly elevated contents of mercury, arsenic and antimony. Mutat Res. 1996 Jul 5;368(3-4):267–274. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(96)90068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kevekordes S., Gebel T., Pav K., Edenharder R., Dunkelberg H. Genotoxicity of selected pesticides in the mouse bone-marrow micronucleus test and in the sister-chromatid exchange test with human lymphocytes in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 1996 Dec;89(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(96)03779-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nikula E., Kiviniitty K., Leisti J., Taskinen P. J. Chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic agents. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984 Apr;10(2):71–74. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Norppa H., Sorsa M., Vainio H., Gröhn P., Heinonen E., Holsti L., Nordman E. Increased sister chromatid exchange frequencies in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic drugs. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1980 Dec;6(4):299–301. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oesch F., Hengstler J. G., Fuchs J. Cigarette smoking protects mononuclear blood cells of carcinogen exposed workers from additional work exposure-induced DNA single strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;321(3):175–185. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(94)90042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oestreicher U., Stephan G., Glatzel M. Chromosome and SCE analysis in peripheral lymphocytes of persons occupationally exposed to cytostatic drugs handled with and without use of safety covers. Mutat Res. 1990 Dec;242(4):271–277. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perry P., Wolff S. New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature. 1974 Sep 13;251(5471):156–158. doi: 10.1038/251156a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roth S., Norppa H., Järventaus H., Kyyrönen P., Ahonen M., Lehtomäki J., Sainio H., Sorsa M. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations, sister-chromatid exchanges and micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes of pharmacists before and after working with cytostatic drugs. Mutat Res. 1994 Dec;325(4):157–162. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(94)90079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sorsa M., Anderson D. Monitoring of occupational exposure to cytostatic anticancer agents. Mutat Res. 1996 Aug 17;355(1-2):253–261. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sorsa M., Hemminki K., Vainio H. Occupational exposure to anticancer drug--potential and real hazards. Mutat Res. 1985 Sep;154(2):135–149. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sterzel W., Bedford P., Eisenbrand G. Automated determination of DNA using the fluorochrome Hoechst 33258. Anal Biochem. 1985 Jun;147(2):462–467. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thiringer G., Granung G., Holmén A., Högstedt B., Järvholm B., Jönsson D., Persson L., Wahlström J., Westin J. Comparison of methods for the biomonitoring of nurses handling antitumor drugs. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Apr;17(2):133–138. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Xue K. X., Wang S., Ma G. J., Zhou P., Wu P. Q., Zhang R. F., Xu Z., Chen W. S., Wang Y. Q. Micronucleus formation in peripheral-blood lymphocytes from smokers and the influence of alcohol- and tea-drinking habits. Int J Cancer. 1992 Mar 12;50(5):702–705. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910500506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES