Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the occurrence of sick building syndrome in a tropical city, and its relation to indoor air quality and other factors. METHODS: 2856 office workers in 56 randomly selected public and private sector buildings were surveyed. The study consisted of a self administered questionnaire assessing symptoms and perception of the physical and psychosocial environment, inspection of the building plans and premises, and measurement of temperature, relative humidity, respirable particles, chemicals, bioaerosols, and other variables. RESULTS: Symptoms typical of the sick building syndrome were reported in 19.6% of the respondents. Multivariate modelling substantiated contributions associated with low thermal comfort, high work related stress, too much noise, a history of allergy or other medical conditions, poor lighting, young employees, and female sex. Measurements of indoor air quality or ventilation were not found to be reliable predictors of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: The survey confirmed the presence of sick building syndrome and its risk factors in the tropics. A biopsychosocial approach to the problem involving symptomatic treatment, environmental control, good ergonomic design, and stress management is recommended.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abbritti G., Muzi G., Accattoli M. P., Fiordi T., Dell'Omo M., Colangeli C., Gabrielli A. R., Fabbri T., D'Alessandro A. High prevalence of sick building syndrome in a new air-conditioned building in Italy. Arch Environ Health. 1992 Jan-Feb;47(1):16–22. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1992.9935939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker D. B. Social and organizational factors in office building-associated illness. Occup Med. 1989 Oct-Dec;4(4):607–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgson M. J., Frohliger J., Permar E., Tidwell C., Traven N. D., Olenchock S. A., Karpf M. Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings. J Occup Med. 1991 Apr;33(4):527–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoge C. W., Breiman R. F. Advances in the epidemiology and control of Legionella infections. Epidemiol Rev. 1991;13:329–340. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaakkola J. J., Miettinen P. Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 15;141(8):755–765. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreiss K. The sick building syndrome in office buildings--a breath of fresh air. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 25;328(12):877–878. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303253281210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ooi P. L., Goh K. T., Heng B. H., Toh Y. H. Epidemiological investigations into an outbreak of building-associated illness in Singapore. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1994;7(4):201–205. doi: 10.1177/101053959400700401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ooi P. L., Goh K. T. Sick-building syndrome in a tropical city. Lancet. 1996 Mar 23;347(9004):841–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90927-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stenberg B., Wall S. Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men? Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(4):491–502. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0104-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss B. Low-level chemical sensitivity: a perspective from behavioral toxicology. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):605–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]