Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1998 Jun;55(6):414–420. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.6.414

Ergonomic stressors and upper extremity disorders in vehicle manufacturing: cross sectional exposure-response trends

L Punnett
PMCID: PMC1757592  PMID: 9764102

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between upper extremity soft tissue disorders and exposure to preventable ergonomic stressors in vehicle manufacturing operations. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted in one vehicle stamping plant and one engine assembly plant. A standardised physical examination of the upper extremities was performed on all subjects. An interviewer administered questionnaire obtained data on demographics, work history, musculoskeletal symptoms, non-occupational covariates, and psycho-physical (relative intensity) ratings of ergonomic stressors. The primary exposure score was computed by summing the responses to the psychophysical exposure items. Multivariate regression analysis was used to model the prevalence of disorders of the shoulders or upper arms, wrists or hands, and all upper extremity regions (each defined both by symptoms and by physical examination plus symptoms) as a function of exposure quartile. RESULTS: A total of 1315 workers (85% of the target population) was examined. The prevalence of symptom disorders was 22% for the wrists or hands and 15% for the shoulders or upper arms; cases defined on the basis of a physical examination were about 80% as frequent. Disorders of the upper extremities, shoulders, and wrists or hands all increased markedly with exposure score, after adjustment for plant, acute injury, sex, body mass index, systemic disease, and seniority. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities were strongly associated with exposure to combined ergonomic stressors. The exposure- response trend was very similar for symptom cases and for physical examination cases. It is important to evaluate all dimensions of ergonomic exposure in epidemiological studies, as exposures often occur in combination in actual workplaces.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong T. J., Buckle P., Fine L. J., Hagberg M., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Kuorinka I. A., Silverstein B. A., Sjogaard G., Viikari-Juntura E. R. A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Apr;19(2):73–84. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990;16 (Suppl 1):55–58. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breslow N. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974 Mar;30(1):89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byström S., Hall C., Welander T., Kilbom A. Clinical disorders and pressure-pain threshold of the forearm and hand among automobile assembly line workers. J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Dec;20(6):782–790. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(95)80047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Estryn-Behar M., Kaminski M., Peigne E., Maillard M. F., Pelletier A., Berthier C., Delaporte M. F., Paoli M. C., Leroux J. M. Strenuous working conditions and musculo-skeletal disorders among female hospital workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990;62(1):47–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00397848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fransson-Hall C., Byström S., Kilbom A. Characteristics of forearm-hand exposure in relation to symptoms among automobile assembly line workers. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jan;29(1):15–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199601)29:1<15::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fransson-Hall C., Byström S., Kilbom A. Self-reported physical exposure and musculoskeletal symptoms of the forearm-hand among automobile assembly-line workers. J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Sep;37(9):1136–1144. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199509000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gamberale F. The perception of exertion. Ergonomics. 1985 Jan;28(1):299–308. doi: 10.1080/00140138508963137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hjelm E. W., Winkel J., Nygård C. H., Wiktorin C., Karlqvist L. Can cardiovascular load in ergonomic epidemiology be estimated by self-report? Stockholm MUSIC 1 Study Group. J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Oct;37(10):1210–1217. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199510000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kemmlert K. A method assigned for the identification of ergonomic hazards - PLIBEL. Appl Ergon. 1995 Jun;26(3):199–211. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keyserling W. M., Stetson D. S., Silverstein B. A., Brouwer M. L. A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders. Ergonomics. 1993 Jul;36(7):807–831. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kilbom A. Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders--what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(Spec No):30–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liira J. P., Shannon H. S., Chambers L. W., Haines T. A. Long-term back problems and physical work exposures in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. Am J Public Health. 1996 Mar;86(3):382–387. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindström I., Ohlund C., Nachemson A. Validity of patient reporting and predictive value of industrial physical work demands. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Apr 15;19(8):888–893. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199404150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maizlish N., Rudolph L., Dervin K., Sankaranarayan M. Surveillance and prevention of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome: an application of the Sentinel Events Notification System for Occupational Risks. Am J Ind Med. 1995 May;27(5):715–729. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nathan P. A., Keniston R. C., Meadows K. D., Lockwood R. S. Validation of occupational hand use categories. J Occup Med. 1993 Oct;35(10):1034–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nelson N. A., Park R. M., Silverstein M. A., Mirer F. E. Cumulative trauma disorders of the hand and wrist in the auto industry. Am J Public Health. 1992 Nov;82(11):1550–1552. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.11.1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ostlin P. Negative health selection into physically light occupations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Jun;42(2):152–156. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.2.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Park R. M., Krebs J. M., Mirer F. E. Occupational disease surveillance using disability insurance at an automotive stamping and assembly complex. J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Nov;38(11):1111–1123. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199611000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park R. M., Nelson N. A., Silverstein M. A., Mirer F. E. Use of medical insurance claims for surveillance of occupational disease. An analysis of cumulative trauma in the auto industry. J Occup Med. 1992 Jul;34(7):731–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Punnett L., Fine L. J., Keyserling W. M., Herrin G. D., Chaffin D. B. Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Oct;17(5):337–346. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Radwin R. G., Armstrong T. J., Vanbergeijk E. Vibration exposure for selected power hand tools used in automobile assembly. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Sep;51(9):510–518. doi: 10.1080/15298669091370013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Silverstein B., Fine L., Stetson D. Hand-wrist disorders among investment casting plant workers. J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Sep;12(5 Pt 2):838–844. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80245-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Toomingas A., Alfredsson L., Kilbom A. Possible bias from rating behavior when subjects rate both exposure and outcome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Oct;23(5):370–377. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES