Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1999 Nov;56(11):758–764. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.11.758

Development of an expert system for the interpretation of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Midlands Thoracic Society Research Group

P S Burge, C F Pantin, D T Newton, P F Gannon, P Bright, J Belcher, J McCoach, D R Baldwin, C B Burge
PMCID: PMC1757688  PMID: 10658562

Abstract

If asthma is due to work exposures there must be a relation between these exposures and the asthma. Asthma causes airway hyperresponsiveness and obstruction; the obstruction can be measured with portable meters, which usually measure peak expiratory flow, or sometimes forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). These can be measured serially (for instance 2 hourly) over several weeks at and away from work. Once occupational asthma develops, the asthma will be induced by many non-specific triggers common to non-occupational asthma. The challenge is to identify changes in peak expiratory flow due to work among other non-occupational causes. Standard statistical tests have been found to be insensitive or non-specific, principally because of the variable period for deterioration to occur after exposure, and the sometimes prolonged time for recovery to occur, such that days away from work may initially have lower measurements than days at work. A computer assisted diagnostic aid (Oasys) has been developed to separate occupational from non-occupational causes of airflow obstruction. Oasys-2 is based on a discriminant analysis, and achieved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of at least 94%; therefore peak expiratory flow monitoring combined with Oasys-2 analysis is better to confirm than to exclude occupational asthma. A neural network version in development has improved on this. Both have been based on expert interpretation of peak flow measurements plotted as daily maximum, mean, and minimum, with the first reading at work taken as the first reading of the day. Oasys has been evaluated with independent criteria against measurements made in a wide range of occupational situations. Oasys is sufficiently developed to be the initial method for the confirmation, although less so for exclusion of occupational asthma.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bright P., Burge P. S. Occupational lung disease. 8. The diagnosis of occupational asthma from serial measurements of lung function at and away from work. Thorax. 1996 Aug;51(8):857–863. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.8.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burge P. S., Harries M. G., O'Brien I., Pepys J. Bronchial provocation studies in workers exposed to the fumes of electronic soldering fluxes. Clin Allergy. 1980 Mar;10(2):137–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1980.tb02091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burge P. S., O'Brien I. M., Harries M. G. Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to colophony. Thorax. 1979 Jun;34(3):308–316. doi: 10.1136/thx.34.3.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burge P. S., O'Brien I. M., Harries M. G. Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to isocyanates. Thorax. 1979 Jun;34(3):317–323. doi: 10.1136/thx.34.3.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burge P. S. Problems in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Br J Dis Chest. 1987 Apr;81(2):105–115. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(87)90127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burge P. S. Single and serial measurements of lung function in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1982;123:47–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cartier A., Bernstein I. L., Burge P. S., Cohn J. R., Fabbri L. M., Hargreave F. E., Malo J. L., McKay R. T., Salvaggio J. E. Guidelines for bronchoprovocation on the investigation of occupational asthma. Report of the Subcommittee on Bronchoprovocation for Occupational Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Nov;84(5 Pt 2):823–829. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90346-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Côté J., Kennedy S., Chan-Yeung M. Sensitivity and specificity of PC20 and peak expiratory flow rate in cedar asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990 Mar;85(3):592–598. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(90)90098-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gannon P. F., Belcher J., Pantin C. F., Burge P. S. The effect of patient technique and training on the accuracy of self-recorded peak expiratory flow. Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):28–31. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a07.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gannon P. F., Newton D. T., Belcher J., Pantin C. F., Burge P. S. Development of OASYS-2: a system for the analysis of serial measurement of peak expiratory flow in workers with suspected occupational asthma. Thorax. 1996 May;51(5):484–489. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.5.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gannon P. F., Newton D. T., Pantin C. F., Burge P. S. Effect of the number of peak expiratory flow readings per day on the estimation of diurnal variation. Thorax. 1998 Sep;53(9):790–792. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.9.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hetzel M. R., Clark T. J. Comparison of normal and asthmatic circadian rhythms in peak expiratory flow rate. Thorax. 1980 Oct;35(10):732–738. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.10.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kongerud J., Søyseth V., Burge S. Serial measurements of peak expiratory flow and responsiveness to methacholine in the diagnosis of aluminium potroom asthma. Thorax. 1992 Apr;47(4):292–297. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.4.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liss G. M., Tarlo S. M. Peak expiratory flow rates in possible occupational asthma. Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):63–69. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malo J. L., Cartier A., Ghezzo H., Chan-Yeung M. Compliance with peak expiratory flow readings affects the within- and between-reader reproducibility of interpretation of graphs in subjects investigated for occupational asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1132–1134. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Malo J. L., Côté J., Cartier A., Boulet L. P., L'Archevêque J., Chan-Yeung M. How many times per day should peak expiratory flow rates be assessed when investigating occupational asthma? Thorax. 1993 Dec;48(12):1211–1217. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.12.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malo J. L., Trudeau C., Ghezzo H., L'Archevêque J., Cartier A. Do subjects investigated for occupational asthma through serial peak expiratory flow measurements falsify their results? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):601–607. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70258-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller M. R., Dickinson S. A., Hitchings D. J. The accuracy of portable peak flow meters. Thorax. 1992 Nov;47(11):904–909. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.11.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moscato G., Godnic-Cvar J., Maestrelli P., Malo J. L., Burge P. S., Coifman R. Statement on self-monitoring of peak expiratory flows in the investigation of occupational asthma. Subcommittee on Occupational Allergy of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. American Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. European Respiratory Society. American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Eur Respir J. 1995 Sep;8(9):1605–1610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perrin B., Lagier F., L'Archevêque J., Cartier A., Boulet L. P., Côté J., Malo J. L. Occupational asthma: validity of monitoring of peak expiratory flow rates and non-allergic bronchial responsiveness as compared to specific inhalation challenge. Eur Respir J. 1992 Jan;5(1):40–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Turner-Warwick M. On observing patterns of airflow obstruction in chronic asthma. Br J Dis Chest. 1977 Apr;71(2):73–86. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(77)90086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Venables K. M., Burge P. S., Davison A. G., Newman Taylor A. J. Peak flow rate records in surveys: reproducibility of observers' reports. Thorax. 1984 Nov;39(11):828–832. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.11.828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WRIGHT B. M., McKERROW C. B. Maximum forced expiratory flow rate as a measure of ventilatory capacity: with a description of a new portable instrument for measuring it. Br Med J. 1959 Nov 21;2(5159):1041–1046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5159.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES