Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1999 Mar;56(3):145–151. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.3.145

Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods

E Tielemans, D Heederik, A Burdorf, R Vermeulen, H Veulemans, H Kromhout, K Hartog
PMCID: PMC1757718  PMID: 10448321

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative merits of job specific questionnaires and various alternative assessment methods of occupational exposures often used in general population studies. METHODS: Subjects were participants in a hospital based case-control study of risk factors for male infertility. Estimates of exposure to organic solvents and chromium, based on job specific questionnaires, generic questionnaires, self reports of exposure, an external job exposure matrix (JEM), and a population specific JEM were compared with passive diffuse dosimeter results and measurements in urine. Urine samples from the end of the shift were analysed for metabolites of toluene, xylene, several glycol ethers, trichloroethylene, and chromium. Passive dosimeter date, metabolites of specific solvents, and urinary chromium concentrations were available for 89, 267, and 156 subjects, respectively. The alternative methods and measurements in urine were compared by means of the Cohen's kappa statistic and by computing the positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of the alternative methods against measurements in urine. RESULTS: Passive dosimeter results indicated that exposure classifications with job specific questionnaire information could discriminate between high and low exposures. The kappa coefficients were < 0.4, so agreement between the various methods and measurements in urine was poor. Sensitivity of the methods ranged from 0.21 to 0.85, whereas specificity ranged from 0.34 to 0.94. Positive predictive values ranged from 0.19 to 0.58, with the highest values for job specific questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the implementation of job specific questionnaires in a general population study might be worth the extra expense it entails, bearing in mind the paramount importance of avoiding false positive exposure estimates when exposure prevalence is low.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (144.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumgarten M., Siemiatycki J., Gibbs G. W. Validity of work histories obtained by interview for epidemiologic purposes. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Oct;118(4):583–591. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blatter B. M., Roeleveld N., Zielhuis G. A., Verbeek A. L. Assessment of occupational exposure in a population based case-control study: comparing postal questionnaires with personal interviews. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jan;54(1):54–59. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunekreef B., Noy D., Clausing P. Variability of exposure measurements in environmental epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 May;125(5):892–898. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Correa A., Stewart W. F., Yeh H. C., Santos-Burgoa C. Exposure measurement in case-control studies: reported methods and recommendations. Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16(1):18–32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eskenazi B., Pearson K. Validation of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing occupational and environmental exposures of pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Nov;128(5):1117–1129. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flegal K. M., Brownie C., Haas J. D. The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Apr;123(4):736–751. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg M., Hémon D. Occupational epidemiology and assessment of exposure. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22 (Suppl 2):S5–S9. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.supplement_2.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Groeseneken D., van Vlem E., Veulemans H., Masschelein R. Gas chromatographic determination of methoxyacetic and ethoxyacetic acid in urine. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Jan;43(1):62–65. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gérin M., Siemiatycki J., Kemper H., Bégin D. Obtaining occupational exposure histories in epidemiologic case-control studies. J Occup Med. 1985 Jun;27(6):420–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoar S. K., Morrison A. S., Cole P., Silverman D. T. An occupation and exposure linkage system for the study of occupational carcinogenesis. J Occup Med. 1980 Nov;22(11):722–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kromhout H., Heederik D., Dalderup L. M., Kromhout D. Performance of two general job-exposure matrices in a study of lung cancer morbidity in the Zutphen cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Sep 15;136(6):698–711. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kromhout H., Oostendorp Y., Heederik D., Boleij J. S. Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. Am J Ind Med. 1987;12(5):551–562. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700120509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kromhout H., Symanski E., Rappaport S. M. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg. 1993 Jun;37(3):253–270. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/37.3.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lumens M. E., Ulenbelt P., Géron H. M., Herber R. F. Hygienic behaviour in chromium plating industries. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;64(7):509–514. doi: 10.1007/BF00381100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marshall J. R., Graham S. Use of dual responses to increase validity of case-control studies. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):125–136. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marshall J. R. The use of dual or multiple reports in epidemiologic studies. Stat Med. 1989 Sep;8(9):1041–1073. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rappaport S. M., Kromhout H., Symanski E. Variation of exposure between workers in homogeneous exposure groups. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Nov;54(11):654–662. doi: 10.1080/15298669391355198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rappaport S. M. Smoothing of exposure variability at the receptor: implications for health standards. Ann Occup Hyg. 1985;29(2):201–214. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/29.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rappaport S. M., Symanski E., Yager J. W., Kupper L. L. The relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 (Suppl 3):49–53. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenstock L., Logerfo J., Heyer N. J., Carter W. B. Development and validation of a self-administered occupational health history questionnaire. J Occup Med. 1984 Jan;26(1):50–54. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198401000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Siemiatycki J., Dewar R., Richardson L. Costs and statistical power associated with five methods of collecting occupation exposure information for population-based case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;130(6):1236–1246. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Soter N. A., Wasserman S. I., Austen K. F. Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge. N Engl J Med. 1976 Mar 25;294(13):687–690. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197603252941302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stewart P. A., Stewart W. F., Heineman E. F., Dosemeci M., Linet M., Inskip P. D. A novel approach to data collection in a case-control study of cancer and occupational exposures. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;25(4):744–752. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.4.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stewart P. A., Stewart W. F. Occupational case-control studies: II. Recommendations for exposure assessment. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Sep;26(3):313–326. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700260305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stewart P. A., Stewart W. F., Siemiatycki J., Heineman E. F., Dosemeci M. Questionnaires for collecting detailed occupational information for community-based case control studies. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Jan;59(1):39–44. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stewart W. F., Stewart P. A. Occupational case-control studies: I. Collecting information on work histories and work-related exposures. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Sep;26(3):297–312. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700260304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanaka S., Ikeda M. A method for determination of trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid in urine. Br J Ind Med. 1968 Jul;25(3):214–219. doi: 10.1136/oem.25.3.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Teschke K., Kennedy S. M., Olshan A. F. Effect of different questionnaire formats on reporting of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Sep;26(3):327–337. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700260306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Veillon C., Patterson K. Y., Bryden N. A. Chromium in urine as measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. Clin Chem. 1982 Nov;28(11):2309–2311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Veulemans H., Groeseneken D., Masschelein R., van Vlem E. Survey of ethylene glycol ether exposures in Belgian industries and workshops. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Aug;48(8):671–676. doi: 10.1080/15298668791385390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Veulemans H., Steeno O., Masschelein R., Groeseneken D. Exposure to ethylene glycol ethers and spermatogenic disorders in man: a case-control study. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Jan;50(1):71–78. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wacholder S., Armstrong B., Hartge P. Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun 1;137(11):1251–1258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES