Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1999 Aug;56(8):567–574. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.8.567

Comparative analyses of the studies of magnetic fields and cancer in electric utility workers: studies from France, Canada, and the United States

L I Kheifets, E S Gilbert, S S Sussman, P Guenel, J D Sahl, D A Savitz, G Theriault
PMCID: PMC1757768  PMID: 10492657

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To summarise and to facilitate comparison of three major studies of electric utility workers that examined the relation between quantitative measurements of occupational exposure to magnetic fields and risk of brain cancer and leukaemia. These studies have been interpreted as providing conflicting evidence. METHODS: A common analytical approach was applied to data from the five cohorts included in the three studies based on original data from four of the cohorts, and published data from one additional cohort. A nested case-control design with conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk/10 microtesla-years (microT-years) for each of the contributing cohorts and for the combined data. The homogeneity of these estimates among the studies was also evaluated. RESULTS: Apparent inconsistencies in the findings of these studies can be explained by statistical variation. Overall, the studies suggest a small increase in risk of both brain cancer and leukaemia. Different methodological choices had little impact on the results. Based on a combined analysis of data from all five studies, the relative risk/10 microT-years was 1.12 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.98 to 1.28) for brain cancer, and 1.09 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.21) for leukaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The combined estimates seem to provide the best summary measures of the data from all studies. However, fluctuations in risks among studies may reflect real differences, and the exposure measurements in different studies may not be entirely comparable.

 

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Floderus B., Persson T., Stenlund C., Wennberg A., Ost A., Knave B. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in relation to leukemia and brain tumors: a case-control study in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control. 1993 Sep;4(5):465–476. doi: 10.1007/BF00050866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guénel P., Nicolau J., Imbernon E., Chevalier A., Goldberg M. Exposure to 50-Hz electric field and incidence of leukemia, brain tumors, and other cancers among French electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec 15;144(12):1107–1121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harrington J. M., McBride D. I., Sorahan T., Paddle G. M., van Tongeren M. Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in relation to mortality from brain cancer among electricity generation and transmission workers. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jan;54(1):7–13. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johansen C., Olsen J. H. Risk of cancer among Danish utility workers--a nationwide cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Mar 15;147(6):548–555. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kheifets L. I., Afifi A. A., Buffler P. A., Zhang Z. W., Matkin C. C. Occupational electric and magnetic field exposure and leukemia. A meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Nov;39(11):1074–1091. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199711000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kheifets L. I., Afifi A. A., Buffler P. A., Zhang Z. W. Occupational electric and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer: a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Dec;37(12):1327–1341. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199512000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miller A. B., To T., Agnew D. A., Wall C., Green L. M. Leukemia following occupational exposure to 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields among Ontario electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Jul 15;144(2):150–160. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sahl J. D., Kelsh M. A., Greenland S. Cohort and nested case-control studies of hematopoietic cancers and brain cancer among electric utility workers. Epidemiology. 1993 Mar;4(2):104–114. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199303000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Savitz D. A., Loomis D. P. Magnetic field exposure in relation to leukemia and brain cancer mortality among electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jan 15;141(2):123–134. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thériault G., Goldberg M., Miller A. B., Armstrong B., Guénel P., Deadman J., Imbernon E., To T., Chevalier A., Cyr D. Cancer risks associated with occupational exposure to magnetic fields among electric utility workers in Ontario and Quebec, Canada, and France: 1970-1989. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Mar 15;139(6):550–572. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tynes T., Reitan J. B., Andersen A. Incidence of cancer among workers in Norwegian hydroelectric power companies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994 Oct;20(5):339–344. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Whitehead A., Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 1991 Nov;10(11):1665–1677. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES