Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Jan;61(1):24–32.

Working conditions, visual fatigue, and mental health among systems analysts in São Paulo, Brazil

L Rocha 1, M Debert-Ribeiro 1
PMCID: PMC1757822  PMID: 14691269

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the association between working conditions and visual fatigue and mental health among systems analysts living in São Paulo, Brazil.

Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out by a multidisciplinary team. It included: ergonomic analysis of work, individual and group interviews, and 553 self applied questionnaires in two enterprises. The comparison population numbered 136 workers in different occupations.

Results: The study population mainly comprised young males. Among systems analysts, visual fatigue was associated with mental workload, inadequate equipment and workstation, low level of worker participation, being a woman, and subject's attitude of fascination by the computer. Nervousness and intellectual performance were associated with mental workload, inadequate equipment, work environment, and tools. Continuing education and leisure were protective factors. Work interfering in family life was associated with mental workload, difficulties with clients, strict deadlines, subject's attitude of fascination by the computer, and finding solutions of work problems outside work. Family support, satisfaction in life and work, and adequate work environment and tools were protective factors. Work interfering in personal life was associated with subject's attitude of fascination by the computer, strict deadlines, inadequate equipment, and high level of work participation. Satisfaction in life and work and continuing education were protective factors. The comparison population did not share common working factors with the systems analysts in the regression analysis.

Conclusions: The main health effects of systems analysts' work were expressed by machine anthropomorphism, being very demanding, mental acceleration, mental absorption, and difficulty in dealing with emotions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aarås A., Horgen G., Bjørset H. H., Ro O., Thoresen M. Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions. Appl Ergon. 1998 Oct;29(5):335–354. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergqvist U. O., Knave B. G. Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994 Feb;20(1):27–33. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergqvist U., Wolgast E., Nilsson B., Voss M. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. Ergonomics. 1995 Apr;38(4):763–776. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Faucett J., Rempel D. VDT-related musculoskeletal symptoms: interactions between work posture and psychosocial work factors. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Nov;26(5):597–612. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700260503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frankenhaeuser M. Coping with stress at work. Int J Health Serv. 1981;11(4):491–510. doi: 10.2190/L7LK-4T4D-KLVV-A9P6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hünting W., Läubli T., Grandjean E. Postural and visual loads at VDT workplaces. I. Constrained postures. Ergonomics. 1981 Dec;24(12):917–931. doi: 10.1080/00140138108924914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaschinski W., Heuer H., Kylian H. Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics. 1998 Jul;41(7):1034–1049. doi: 10.1080/001401398186586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalimo R. Stress in work. Conceptual analysis and a study on prison personnel. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1980;6 (Suppl 3):1–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knave B. G., Wibom R. I., Voss M., Hedström L. D., Bergqvist U. O. Work with video display terminals among office employees. I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985 Dec;11(6):457–466. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mocci F., Serra A., Corrias G. A. Psychological factors and visual fatigue in working with video display terminals. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Apr;58(4):267–271. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.4.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nishiyama K. Ergonomic aspects of the health and safety of VDT work in Japan: a review. Ergonomics. 1990 Jun;33(6):659–685. doi: 10.1080/00140139008927178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rocha L. E., Debert-Ribeiro M. Trabalho, saúde e gênero: estudo comparativo sobre analistas de sistemas. Rev Saude Publica. 2001 Dec;35(6):539–547. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102001000600007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith M. J. Psychosocial aspects of working with video display terminals (VDTs) and employee physical and mental health. Ergonomics. 1997 Oct;40(10):1002–1015. doi: 10.1080/001401397187568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Villanueva M. B., Sotoyama M., Jonai H., Takeuchi Y., Saito S. Adjustments of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to changes in the screen height of the visual display terminal. Ergonomics. 1996 Jul;39(7):933–945. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES