Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Jan;61(1):33–38.

Assessment of indoor air problems at work with a questionnaire

K Reijula 1, C Sundman-Digert 1
PMCID: PMC1757823  PMID: 14691270

Abstract

Aims: To assess the extent of indoor air problems in office environments in Finland.

Methods: Complaints and symptoms related to the indoor environment experienced by office workers were collected from 122 workplaces in 1996–99 by using the modified Indoor Air Questionnaire established by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. Altogether 11 154 employees took part in the survey.

Results: The most common problems were dry air (35% of the respondents), stuffy air (34%), dust or dirt in the indoor environment (25%), and draught (22%). The most common work related symptoms were irritated, stuffy, or runny nose (20%), itching, burning, or irritation of the eyes (17%), and fatigue (16%). Women reported indoor air problems and work related symptoms more often than men. Allergic persons and smokers reported indoor air problems more often, and experienced work related symptoms more often than non-allergic persons and non-smokers.

Conclusions: The complaints and work related symptoms associated with indoor air problems were common in office workers. The present questionnaire is a suitable tool for the occupational health personnel in investigating indoor air problems and the data of the survey can be used as a reference when the results of a survey at work are being analysed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bullinger M., Morfeld M., von Mackensen S., Brasche S. The sick-building-syndrome--do women suffer more? Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1999 Aug;202(2-4):235–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burge S., Hedge A., Wilson S., Bass J. H., Robertson A. Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 1987;31(4A):493–504. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/31.4a.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finnegan M. J., Pickering C. A., Burge P. S. The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1573–1575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heloma A., Jaakkola M. S., Kähkönen E., Reijula K. The short-term impact of national smoke-free workplace legislation on passive smoking and tobacco use. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1416–1418. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaakkola J. J., Miettinen P. Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 15;141(8):755–765. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lahtinen Marjaana, Huuhtanen Pekka, Kähkönen Erkki, Reijula Kari. Psychosocial dimensions of solving an indoor air problem. Indoor Air. 2002 Mar;12(1):33–46. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.120105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lundin L. Allergic and non-allergic students' perception of the same high school environment. Indoor Air. 1999 Jun;9(2):92–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-2-00004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stenberg B., Wall S. Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men? Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(4):491–502. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0104-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES