Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Dec;11(4):320–326. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.320

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy

J Quintana 1, J Cabriada 1, d Lopez 1, M Varona 1, V Oribe 1, B Barrios 1, I Arostegui 1, A Bilbao 1
PMCID: PMC1757992  PMID: 12468691

Abstract

Objective: Consensus development techniques were used in the late 1980s to create explicit criteria for the appropriateness of cholecystectomy. New diagnostic and treatment techniques have been developed in the last decade, so an updated appropriateness of indications tool was developed for cholecystectomy in patients with non-malignant diseases. The validity and reliability of panel results using this tool were tested.

Methods: Criteria were developed using a modified Delphi panel judgement process. The level of agreement between the panellists (six gastroenterologists and six surgeons) was analysed and the ratings were compared with those of a second different panel using weighted kappa statistics.

Results: The results of the main panel were presented as a decision tree. Of the 210 scenarios evaluated by the main panel in the second round, 51% were found appropriate, 26% uncertain, and 23% inappropriate. Agreement was achieved in 54% of the scenarios and disagreement in 3%. Although the gastroenterologists tended to score fewer scenarios as appropriate, as a group they did not differ from the surgeons. Comparison of the ratings of the main panel with those of a second panel resulted in a weighted kappa statistic of 0.75.

Conclusions: The parameters tested showed acceptable validity and reliability results for an evaluation tool. These results support the use of this algorithm as a screening tool for assessing the appropriateness of cholecystectomy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (276.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bateson M. C. Fortnightly review: gallbladder disease. BMJ. 1999 Jun 26;318(7200):1745–1748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7200.1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulton R. A., Adams D. H. Gallbladder polyps: when to wait and when to act. Lancet. 1997 Mar 22;349(9055):817–817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61744-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brook R. H., Chassin M. R., Fink A., Solomon D. H., Kosecoff J., Park R. E. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53–63. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300002774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Callaghan J. Twenty-five years of gallbladder surgery in a small rural hospital. Am J Surg. 1995 Mar;169(3):313–315. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coulter I., Adams A., Shekelle P. Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel. Health Serv Res. 1995 Oct;30(4):577–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubinsky M., Ferguson J. H. Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare coverage assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(3):480–488. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300001069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraser G. M., Pilpel D., Hollis S., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach. Qual Assur Health Care. 1993 Mar;5(1):75–80. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/5.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraser G. M., Pilpel D., Hollis S., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. The agreed indications and contra-indications for cholecystectomy. Qual Assur Health Care. 1993 Mar;5(1):81–85. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/5.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser G. M., Pilpel D., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;6(3):251–255. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman G. D. Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):399–404. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80930-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johanning J. M., Gruenberg J. C. The changing face of cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):643–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kahan J. P., Park R. E., Leape L. L., Bernstein S. J., Hilborne L. H., Parker L., Kamberg C. J., Ballard D. J., Brook R. H. Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):512–523. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahn K. L., Park R. E., Brook R. H., Chassin M. R., Kosecoff J., Fink A., Keesey J. W., Solomon D. H. The effect of comorbidity on appropriateness ratings for two gastrointestinal procedures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(2):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kravitz R. L., Laouri M., Kahan J. P., Guzy P., Sherman T., Hilborne L., Brook R. H. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23;274(8):632–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lam C. M., Murray F. E., Cuschieri A. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland. Gut. 1996 Feb;38(2):282–284. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.2.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McKee M., Priest P., Ginzler M., Black N. How representative are members of expert panels? Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(2):89–94. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Merrick N. J., Fink A., Park R. E., Brook R. H., Kosecoff J., Chassin M. R., Solomon D. H. Derivation of clinical indications for carotid endarterectomy by an expert panel. Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):187–190. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Naylor C. D. What is appropriate care? N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 25;338(26):1918–1920. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neugebauer E., Troidl H., Kum C. K., Eypasch E., Miserez M., Paul A. The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 1995 May;9(5):550–563. doi: 10.1007/BF00206852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park R. E., Fink A., Brook R. H., Chassin M. R., Kahn K. L., Merrick N. J., Kosecoff J., Solomon D. H. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):766–772. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pessaux P., Tuech J. J., Derouet N., Rouge C., Regenet N., Arnaud J. P. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2000 Nov;14(11):1067–1069. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phelps C. E. The methodologic foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 21;329(17):1241–1245. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310213291707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pilpel D., Fraser G. M., Kosecoff J., Weitzman S., Brook R. H. Regional differences in appropriateness of cholecystectomy in a prepaid health insurance system. Public Health Rev. 1992;20(1-2):61–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rigter H., Meijler A. P., McDonnell J., Scholma J. K., Bernstein S. J. Indications for coronary revascularisation: a Dutch perspective. Heart. 1997 Mar;77(3):211–218. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.3.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schneider A. J. Assessment of risk factors and surgical outcome. Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Oct;63(5):1113–1126. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scott E. A., Black N. Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom--a consensus panel approach. Gut. 1991 Sep;32(9):1066–1070. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.9.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott E. A., Black N. When does consensus exist in expert panels? J Public Health Med. 1991 Feb;13(1):35–39. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sesé Torres J., Morlans Molina G. Colecistitis aguda alitiásica. Med Clin (Barc) 1985 Apr 30;84(16):663–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shekelle P. G., Kahan J. P., Bernstein S. J., Leape L. L., Kamberg C. J., Park R. E. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 25;338(26):1888–1895. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Søndenaa K., Nesvik I., Solhaug J. H., Søreide O. Randomization to surgery or observation in patients with symptomatic gallbladder stone disease. The problem of evidence-based medicine in clinical practice. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jun;32(6):611–616. doi: 10.3109/00365529709025108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wennberg J. E. The paradox of appropriate care. JAMA. 1987 Nov 13;258(18):2568–2569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Winslow C. M., Kosecoff J. B., Chassin M., Kanouse D. E., Brook R. H. The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA. 1988 Jul 22;260(4):505–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES