Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 1998 Apr;74(2):136–139. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.2.136

The tampon test for trichomoniasis: a comparison between conventional methods and a polymerase chain reaction for Trichomonas vaginalis in women

B A Paterson, S N Tabrizi, S M Garland, C K Fairley, F J Bowden
PMCID: PMC1758091  PMID: 9634327

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Trichomonas vaginalis is the most common STD worldwide and the infection has been linked with an increased risk of HIV transmission. We present a detailed comparison between conventional collection and testing methods and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tampon test for T vaginalis. METHODS: Women were tested for the presence of T vaginalis by PCR analysis of a tampon specimen and by conventional methods which included one or more of the following: culture and microscopy from a high vaginal swab (HVS) or endocervical swab (ECS), and microscopy of a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. RESULTS: T vaginalis was detected in 51/590 (8.6%) conventional tests and 93/590 (15.8%) tampon specimens. Retesting of all tampon PCR positive specimens confirmed 89/93 (95.7%) tests. Using the tampon PCR as the reference, the sensitivities of the different conventional sampling and testing methods for the detection of T vaginalis were 8.3% (5/60) for ECS microscopy or culture, 31% (13/42) for HVS microscopy or culture, 52.8% (19/36) for HVS directly inoculated into Trichomonas medium and 59.4% (38/64) for Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS: No conventional test in the remote setting has comparable sensitivity to PCR. The Pap smear is the next most sensitive, but requires a speculum examination. The use of PCR will allow inclusion of T vaginalis into STD screening programmes in both developed (lower prevalence) and developing (higher prevalence) countries. 




Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dickerson M. C., Johnston J., Delea T. E., White A., Andrews E. The causal role for genital ulcer disease as a risk factor for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. An application of the Bradford Hill criteria. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Sep-Oct;23(5):429–440. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199609000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fairley C. K., Chen S., Tabrizi S. N., Quinn M. A., McNeil J. J., Garland S. M. Tampons: a novel patient-administered method for the assessment of genital human papillomavirus infection. J Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;165(6):1103–1106. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fouts A. C., Kraus S. J. Trichomonas vaginalis: reevaluation of its clinical presentation and laboratory diagnosis. J Infect Dis. 1980 Feb;141(2):137–143. doi: 10.1093/infdis/141.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gelbart S. M., Thomason J. L., Osypowski P. J., Kellett A. V., James J. A., Broekhuizen F. F. Growth of Trichomonas vaginalis in commercial culture media. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 May;28(5):962–964. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.962-964.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghys P. D., Diallo M. O., Ettiègne-Traoré V., Yeboué K. M., Gnaoré E., Lorougnon F., Kalé K., Van Dyck E., Brettegaard K., Hoyi Y. M. Genital ulcers associated with human immunodeficiency virus-related immunosuppression in female sex workers in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;172(5):1371–1374. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.5.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs R. S., Romero R., Hillier S. L., Eschenbach D. A., Sweet R. L. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1515–1528. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91628-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grosskurth H., Mosha F., Todd J., Mwijarubi E., Klokke A., Senkoro K., Mayaud P., Changalucha J., Nicoll A., ka-Gina G. Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1995 Aug 26;346(8974):530–536. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91380-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hadgu A. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):592–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kengne P., Veas F., Vidal N., Rey J. L., Cuny G. Trichomonas vaginalis: repeated DNA target for highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction diagnosis. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1994 Sep;40(6):819–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krieger J. N., Tam M. R., Stevens C. E., Nielsen I. O., Hale J., Kiviat N. B., Holmes K. K. Diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Comparison of conventional wet-mount examination with cytologic studies, cultures, and monoclonal antibody staining of direct specimens. JAMA. 1988 Feb 26;259(8):1223–1227. doi: 10.1001/jama.259.8.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laga M., Manoka A., Kivuvu M., Malele B., Tuliza M., Nzila N., Goeman J., Behets F., Batter V., Alary M. Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study. AIDS. 1993 Jan;7(1):95–102. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199301000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leroy V., De Clercq A., Ladner J., Bogaerts J., Van de Perre P., Dabis F. Should screening of genital infections be part of antenatal care in areas of high HIV prevalence? A prospective cohort study from Kigali, Rwanda, 1992-1993. The Pregnancy and HIV (EGE) Group. Genitourin Med. 1995 Aug;71(4):207–211. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.4.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Petersen C. S., Carl L., Alnor D., Thomsen U., Thomsen H. K. Ignored trichomonal infestation diagnosed by Papanicolaou smear. Genitourin Med. 1995 Aug;71(4):257–258. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petersen C. S., Carl L., Alnor D., Thomsen U., Thomsen H. K. Ignored trichomonal infestation diagnosed by Papanicolaou smear. Genitourin Med. 1995 Aug;71(4):257–258. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Resnick R. M., Cornelissen M. T., Wright D. K., Eichinger G. H., Fox H. S., ter Schegget J., Manos M. M. Detection and typing of human papillomavirus in archival cervical cancer specimens by DNA amplification with consensus primers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Sep 19;82(18):1477–1484. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.18.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Riley D. E., Roberts M. C., Takayama T., Krieger J. N. Development of a polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):465–472. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.465-472.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spence M. R., Hollander D. H., Smith J., McCaig L., Sewell D., Brockman M. The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1980 Oct-Dec;7(4):168–171. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198010000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tabrizi S. N., Paterson B., Fairley C. K., Bowden F. J., Garland S. M. A self-administered technique for the detection of sexually transmitted diseases in remote communities. J Infect Dis. 1997 Jul;176(1):289–292. doi: 10.1086/517269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wølner-Hanssen P., Krieger J. N., Stevens C. E., Kiviat N. B., Koutsky L., Critchlow C., DeRouen T., Hillier S., Holmes K. K. Clinical manifestations of vaginal trichomoniasis. JAMA. 1989 Jan 27;261(4):571–576. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420040109029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang Z. F. Epidemiology of trichomonas vaginalis. A prospective study in China. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Sep-Oct;23(5):415–424. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199609000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES