Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 1998 Aug;74(4):289–293. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.4.289

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital swabs: comparison of commercial and in house amplification methods with culture

R M Shattock, C Patrizio, P Simmonds, S Sutherland
PMCID: PMC1758124  PMID: 9924472

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the sensitivity of the Roche Cobas, Roche Amplicor plate kit, ligase chain reaction (LCR), and an in house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by titration of purified elementary bodies (EB) and also to test 245 urethral and endocervical specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis by the four assays as well as conventional culture. STUDY DESIGN: EB titrations were run in duplicate in each commercial assay and six times in the in house PCR. Clinical samples were aliquoted and tested by each assay and were considered positive if C trachomatis was detected by two or more separate tests or if the sample was either culture or immunofluorescence positive. Major outer membrane protein (MOMP) specific primers were used as a confirmatory assay for the in house PCR. RESULTS: The in house PCR, Roche Cobas Amplicor, LCR, and Amplicor plate kit gave detection limits of approximately 1, 1-2, 2, and 2-4 EBs respectively. By the criteria described above for definition of a C trachomatis positive result in clinical samples we identified 23 true positives among the 245 clinical specimens. The in house PCR detected all 23 giving a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98%. The Roche Cobas Amplicor, Roche Amplicor plate kit, and LCR detected 21, 19, and 19 of these respectively giving sensitivities of 87.5%, 82%, and 82% respectively and specificities of 99.5%, 99%, and 100% respectively. The culture gave a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: All four amplification assays had a greater sensitivity than the culture used routinely in this laboratory. The in house plasmid PCR had the greatest sensitivity and when combined with confirmation by immunofluorescence detected the greatest number of positives. This increased sensitivity is likely to have been achieved by the use of a DNA purification step and of nested primers in the amplification stage and their combined use in routine diagnostic assays for chlamydia might increase the frequency of C trachomatis detections. However, this assay is much less user friendly than the two semiautomated commercial assays investigated in this study. 




Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birkenmeyer L. G., Mushahwar I. K. DNA probe amplification methods. J Virol Methods. 1991 Nov-Dec;35(2):117–126. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(91)90127-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bobo L., Munoz B., Viscidi R., Quinn T., Mkocha H., West S. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis eye infection in Tanzania by polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassay. Lancet. 1991 Oct 5;338(8771):847–850. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91502-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catry M. A., Borrego M. J., Cardoso J., Azevedo J., Santo I. Comparison of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test and cell culture for the detection of urogenital chlamydial infections. Genitourin Med. 1995 Aug;71(4):247–250. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.4.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans R. T., Woodland R. M. Detection of chlamydiae by isolation and direct examination. Br Med Bull. 1983 Apr;39(2):181–186. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holland S. M., Hudson A. P., Bobo L., Whittum-Hudson J. A., Viscidi R. P., Quinn T. C., Taylor H. R. Demonstration of chlamydial RNA and DNA during a culture-negative state. Infect Immun. 1992 May;60(5):2040–2047. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.5.2040-2047.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahony J. B., Chernesky M. A. Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):865–867. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.865-867.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahony J. B., Luinstra K. E., Sellors J. W., Chernesky M. A. Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1753–1758. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1753-1758.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miyashita N., Matsumoto A., Niki Y., Matsushima T. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a ligase chain reaction test kit for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Pathol. 1996 Jun;49(6):515–517. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.6.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mårdh P. A., Zeeberg B. Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures. Br J Vener Dis. 1981 Aug;57(4):268–272. doi: 10.1136/sti.57.4.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palmer L., Falkow S. A common plasmid of Chlamydia trachomatis. Plasmid. 1986 Jul;16(1):52–62. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(86)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ripa K. T., Mårdh P. A. Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):328–331. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.328-331.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Simmonds P., Balfe P., Peutherer J. F., Ludlam C. A., Bishop J. O., Brown A. J. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals contain provirus in small numbers of peripheral mononuclear cells and at low copy numbers. J Virol. 1990 Feb;64(2):864–872. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.2.864-872.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith I. W., Morrison C. L., Patrizio C., McMillan A. Use of a commercial PCR kit for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Pathol. 1993 Sep;46(9):822–825. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.9.822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomas B. J., Evans R. T., Hutchinson G. R., Taylor-Robinson D. Early detection of chlamydial inclusions combining the use of cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells and immunofluorescence staining. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Sep;6(3):285–292. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.3.285-292.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES