Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate among young people the relation between the number of sexual partners and use of medical services in order to guide planning of sexually transmitted disease screening. DESIGN: Cross sectional study within a birth cohort using a questionnaire presented by computer. SETTING: Dunedin, New Zealand in 1993-4. SUBJECTS: 477 men and 458 women aged 21 enrolled in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, comprising 91.7% of survivors of the cohort. RESULTS: Men with multiple sexual partners in the previous year were less likely to have a general practitioner than men with one or no partners (76.2% v 88.5%, p < 0.01). Among the women the respective proportions (83.1% and 88.4%) were not significantly different. Significantly more women than men (75.8% v 50.7%, p = 0.03) with five or more partners in the previous year had visited their own general practitioner over that period. Among the sexually experienced, more women than men attended any setting appropriate for sexually transmitted disease screening (93.6% v 71.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In New Zealand a screening programme for sexually transmitted diseases among young adults reliant on invitation by their own general practitioner would be biased towards those at less risk. Opportunistic screening in general practice would potentially include only about half the most sexually active men and three quarters of such women over a 12 month period. The extension of opportunistic screening to other settings considered appropriate for discussion of sexual health issues could potentially engage the vast majority of women, but not men, at most risk. Any screening programme should incorporate an effective method of finding and treating the sexual partners of infected women.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brunham R. C., Plummer F. A. A general model of sexually transmitted disease epidemiology and its implications for control. Med Clin North Am. 1990 Nov;74(6):1339–1352. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30484-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Connor N., Catchpole M., Rogers P. A., Macdonald N., Mc Garrigle C., Simms I., Radcliffe L., Gilbart V., Clarke S. E., Webster J. Sexually transmitted diseases among teenagers in England and Wales. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1997 Nov 14;7(12):R173–R178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickson N., Paul C., Herbison P., McNoe B., Silva P. The lifetime occurrence of sexually transmitted diseases among a cohort aged 21. N Z Med J. 1996 Aug 23;109(1028):308–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genç M., Ruusuvaara L., Mårdh P. A. An economic evaluation of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2057–2064. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510170047029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kretzschmar M., van Duynhoven Y. T., Severijnen A. J. Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug 1;144(3):306–317. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mårdh P. A. Is Europe ready for STD screening? Genitourin Med. 1997 Apr;73(2):96–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scholes D., Stergachis A., Heidrich F. E., Andrilla H., Holmes K. K., Stamm W. E. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1362–1366. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stokes T. Screening for Chlamydia in general practice: a literature review and summary of the evidence. J Public Health Med. 1997 Jun;19(2):222–232. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]