Abstract
The in vitro activity of cefmetazole versus that of other antimicrobial drugs was assessed against 374 clinical isolates of Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., and anaerobic gram-positive cocci. Compared with cefoxitin, cefmetazole showed good activity against Bacteroides fragilis, other Bacteroides species, and anaerobic cocci. It was somewhat less active than cefoxitin against Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, B. ovatus, B. distasonis, and B. vulgatus and somewhat more active against Clostridium spp.
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aldridge K. E., Sanders C. V., Janney A., Faro S., Marier R. L. Comparison of the activities of penicillin G and new beta-lactam antibiotics against clinical isolates of Bacteroides species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Sep;26(3):410–413. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.3.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Bene V. E., Carek P. J., Twitty J. A., Burkey L. J. In vitro activity of cefbuperazone compared with that of other new beta-lactam agents against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 May;27(5):817–820. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.5.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dias M. B., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L., Tally F. P. In vitro activity of cefbuperazone against Bacteroides spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Jun;27(6):968–970. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.6.968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobus N. V., Ferreira M. C., Barza M. In vitro activity of azthreonam, a monobactam antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):832–838. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.5.832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Barry A. L., Fuchs P. C., Thornsberry C. Antimicrobial activity of cefmetazole (CS-1170) and recommendations for susceptibility testing by disk diffusion, dilution, and anaerobic methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;24(6):1055–1059. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.1055-1059.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kesado T., Watanabe K., Asahi Y., Isono M., Ueno K. Comparative antibacterial activities of 7 alpha-methoxy cephalosporins and 7 beta-methoxyiminoacetamido cephalosporins against Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jan;25(1):131–133. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Cuchural G. J., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L., Aldridge K. E., Cleary T. J., Finegold S. M., Hill G. B., Iannini P. B., McCloskey R. V. Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States in 1981. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):536–540. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Bartlett J. G., Gorbach S. L. Susceptibility of anaerobes to cefoxitin and other cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Feb;7(2):128–132. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.2.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
