Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1997 Apr;52(4):362–368. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.4.362

A short-term controlled trial of an adjustable oral appliance for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea

K A Ferguson, T Ono, A A Lowe, S al-Majed, L L Love, J A Fleetham
PMCID: PMC1758547  PMID: 9196520

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although oral appliances are effective in some patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), they are not universally effective. A novel anterior mandibular positioner (AMP) has been developed with an adjustable hinge that allows progressive advancement of the mandible. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to compare efficacy, side effects, patient compliance, and preference between AMP and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate OSA. METHODS: Twenty four patients of mean (SD) age 44.0 (10.6) years were recruited with a mean (SD) body mass index of 32.0 (8.2) kg/m2, Epworth sleepiness score 10.7 (3.4), and apnoea/hypopnoea index 26.8 (11.9)/hour. There was a two week wash-in and a two week wash-out period and two treatment periods (AMP and nCPAP) each of four months. Efficacy, side effects, compliance, and preference were evaluated by a questionnaire and home sleep monitoring. RESULTS: One patient dropped out early in the study and three refused to cross over so treatment results are presented on the remaining 20 patients. The apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) was lower with nasal CPAP 4.2 (2.2)/hour than with the AMP 13.6 (14.5)/hour (p < 0.01). Eleven of the 20 patients (55%) who used the AMP were treatment successes (reduction of AHI to < 10/hour and relief of symptoms), one (5%) was a compliance failure (unable or unwilling to use the treatment), and eight (40%) were treatment failures (failure to reduce AHI to < 10/hour and/or failure to relieve symptoms). Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) who used nCPAP were treatment successes, six (30%) were compliance failures, and there were no treatment failures. There was greater patient satisfaction with the AMP (p < 0.01) than with nCPAP but no difference in reported side effects or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: AMP is an effective treatment in some patients with mild to moderate OSA and is associated with greater patient satisfaction than nCPAP. 




Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (155.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Biernacka H., Douglas N. J. Evaluation of a computerised polysomnography system. Thorax. 1993 Mar;48(3):280–283. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cartwright R. D. Predicting response to the tongue retaining device for sleep apnea syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985 Jun;111(6):385–388. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1985.00800080071008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Engleman H. M., Martin S. E., Douglas N. J. Compliance with CPAP therapy in patients with the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax. 1994 Mar;49(3):263–266. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.3.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eveloff S. E., Rosenberg C. L., Carlisle C. C., Millman R. P. Efficacy of a Herbst mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Apr;149(4 Pt 1):905–909. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.4.8143054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson K. A., Fleetham J. A. Sleep-related breathing disorders. 4. Consequences of sleep disordered breathing. Thorax. 1995 Sep;50(9):998–1004. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.9.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferguson K. A., Ono T., Lowe A. A., Keenan S. P., Fleetham J. A. A randomized crossover study of an oral appliance vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1996 May;109(5):1269–1275. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.5.1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson K. A., Ono T., Lowe A. A., Ryan C. F., Fleetham J. A. The relationship between obesity and craniofacial structure in obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1995 Aug;108(2):375–381. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johns M. W. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540–545. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Man G. C., Kang B. V. Validation of a portable sleep apnea monitoring device. Chest. 1995 Aug;108(2):388–393. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Sullivan R. A., Hillman D. R., Mateljan R., Pantin C., Finucane K. E. Mandibular advancement splint: an appliance to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jan;151(1):194–198. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Orr W. C., Eiken T., Pegram V., Jones R., Rundell O. H. A laboratory validation study of a portable system for remote recording of sleep-related respiratory disorders. Chest. 1994 Jan;105(1):160–162. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ryan C. F., Lowe A. A., Li D., Fleetham J. A. Three-dimensional upper airway computed tomography in obstructive sleep apnea. A prospective study in patients treated by uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Aug;144(2):428–432. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmidt-Nowara W. W., Meade T. E., Hays M. B. Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a dental orthosis. Chest. 1991 Jun;99(6):1378–1385. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.6.1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmidt-Nowara W., Lowe A., Wiegand L., Cartwright R., Perez-Guerra F., Menn S. Oral appliances for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep. 1995 Jul;18(6):501–510. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.6.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sullivan C. E., Issa F. G., Berthon-Jones M., Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet. 1981 Apr 18;1(8225):862–865. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES