Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Sep;11(3):191–194. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.191

Tobacco point of sale advertising increases positive brand user imagery

R Donovan 1, J Jancey 1, S Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1759002  PMID: 12198267

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the potential impact of point of sale advertising on adolescents so as to inform changes to the Tobacco Control Act.

Design: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the control condition, students were exposed to a photograph of a packet of cigarettes; in the intervention condition, students were exposed to an ad for cigarettes, typical of point of sale advertising posters. All students then rated the brand user on a set of 12 bipolar adjectives. Two brands were used in the study: Benson & Hedges, and Marlboro.

Subjects: One hundred year (grade) 6 and 7 students (age range 10–12 years), from four Western Australian metropolitan primary schools, participated in the study.

Results: In a majority of the brand user descriptions, the cigarette advertisements increased brand user imagery in a positive way, especially for Benson & Hedges. For example, participants viewing the Benson & Hedges advertisement, as distinct from those viewing the Benson & Hedges pack only, were more likely to describe the Benson & Hedges user as relaxed, interesting, cool, rich, adventurous, and classy. Relative to the Marlboro pack only, the Marlboro ad increased positive perceptions of the Marlboro user on adventurous, interesting, and relaxed.

Conclusions: The results presented here support restrictions being placed on advertising at point of sale, since such ads have the potential to increase positive brand user imagery directly in the situation where a product purchase can take place, and hence the potential to increase the likelihood of impulse purchasing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cushman P. Why the self is empty. Toward a historically situated psychology. Am Psychol. 1990 May;45(5):599–611. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.45.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fischer P. M., Schwartz M. P., Richards J. W., Jr, Goldstein A. O., Rojas T. H. Brand logo recognition by children aged 3 to 6 years. Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3145–3148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Giacopassi D., Vandiver M. University students' perceptions of tobacco, cocaine, and homicide fatalities. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 Feb;25(1):163–172. doi: 10.1081/ada-100101852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill D., White V., Segan C. Prevalence of cigarette smoking among Australian secondary school students in 1993. Aust J Public Health. 1995 Oct;19(5):445–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacFadyen L., Hastings G., MacKintosh A. M. Cross sectional study of young people's awareness of and involvement with tobacco marketing. BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):513–517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Novelli WD. "Don't smoke," buy marlboro . BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1296–1296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perry C. L. The tobacco industry and underage youth smoking: tobacco industry documents from the Minnesota litigation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):935–941. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pierce J. P., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Berry C. C. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 1998 Feb 18;279(7):511–515. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.7.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pierce J. P., Gilpin E. A., Choi W. S. Sharing the blame: smoking experimentation and future smoking-attributable mortality due to Joe Camel and Marlboro advertising and promotions. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):37–44. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rigotti N. A., DiFranza J. R., Chang Y., Tisdale T., Kemp B., Singer D. E. The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents' access to tobacco and smoking behavior. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 9;337(15):1044–1051. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers T., Feighery E. C., Tencati E. M., Butler J. L., Weiner L. Community mobilization to reduce point-of-purchase advertising of tobacco products. Health Educ Q. 1995 Nov;22(4):427–442. doi: 10.1177/109019819502200402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Unger J. B., Johnson C. A., Rohrbach L. A. Recognition and liking of tobacco and alcohol advertisements among adolescents: relationships with susceptibility to substance use. Prev Med. 1995 Sep;24(5):461–466. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES