Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Sep;11(3):246–251. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.246

Exposure to teachers smoking and adolescent smoking behaviour: analysis of cross sectional data from Denmark

L Poulsen 1, M Osler 1, C Roberts 1, P Due 1, M Damsgaard 1, B Holstein 1
PMCID: PMC1759003  PMID: 12198278

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether adolescent smoking behaviour is associated with their perceived exposure to teachers or other pupils smoking at school, after adjustment for exposure to smoking at home, in school, and best friends smoking.

Design: Logistic regression analysis of cross sectional data from students in Denmark.

Subjects: 1515 grade 9 students (mean age 15.8) from 90 classes in 48 Danish schools.

Outcome measure: Self reported smoking behaviour; daily smoking and heavy smoking, defined as those smoking more than 20 cigarettes per week.

Results: Of the students in this study, 62% of boys and 60% of girls reported being exposed to teachers smoking outdoors on the school premises. The proportion of boys and girls reporting to have been exposed to teachers smoking inside the school building were 86% and 88%, respectively. Furthermore, 91% of boys and 92% of girls reported that they had seen other students smoking outdoors on the school premises. Adolescents' perceived exposure to teachers smoking outdoors on the school premises was significantly associated with daily smoking, having adjusted for sex, exposure to teachers smoking indoors at school and pupils smoking outdoors at school, as well as the smoking behaviour of mother, father, and best friend (odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.8). Adolescents' perceived exposure to teachers smoking inside the school building was not associated with daily smoking (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.6) and perceived exposure to pupils smoking outdoors was not associated with daily smoking (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.5 to 4.4). There were similar findings with heavy smoking as the outcome variable.

Conclusions: Teachers smoking during school hours is associated with adolescent smoking. This finding has implications for future tobacco prevention strategies in schools in many countries with liberal smoking policies where it might provide support for those working to establish smokefree schools.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (233.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauman K. E., Ennett S. T. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction. 1996 Feb;91(2):185–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bewley B. R., Johnson M. R., Banks M. H. Teachers' smoking. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Sep;33(3):219–222. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.3.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Conrad K. M., Flay B. R., Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Br J Addict. 1992 Dec;87(12):1711–1724. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crow C. S. Smoking areas on school grounds: are we encouraging teenagers to smoke? J Adolesc Health Care. 1984 Apr;5(2):117–119. doi: 10.1016/s0197-0070(84)80010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dalla-Vorgia P., Sasco A. J., Skalkidis Y., Katsouyanni K., Trichopoulos D. An evaluation of the effectiveness of tobacco-control legislative policies in European Community countries. Scand J Soc Med. 1990 Jun;18(2):81–89. doi: 10.1177/140349489001800201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies H. T., Crombie I. K., Tavakoli M. When can odds ratios mislead? BMJ. 1998 Mar 28;316(7136):989–991. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Due E. P., Holstein B. E. Rygevaner blandt 11-15-årige, 1984-1994. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Feb 17;159(8):1090–1093. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elders M. J., Perry C. L., Eriksen M. P., Giovino G. A. The report of the Surgeon General: preventing tobacco use among young people. Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):543–547. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.4.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeill A. D., Jarvis M. J., Stapleton J. A., Russell M. A., Eiser J. R., Gammage P., Gray E. M. Prospective study of factors predicting uptake of smoking in adolescents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Mar;43(1):72–78. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.1.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Patrick D. L., Cheadle A., Thompson D. C., Diehr P., Koepsell T., Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1086–1093. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pentz M. A., Brannon B. R., Charlin V. L., Barrett E. J., MacKinnon D. P., Flay B. R. The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health. 1989 Jul;79(7):857–862. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.7.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tyas S. L., Pederson L. L. Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):409–420. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES