Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1988 Oct;32(10):1484–1489. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.10.1484

Laboratory- and species-specific interpretive breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of chloramphenicol susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae.

G Kronvall 1, S Ringertz 1, I Karlsson 1, E Göransson 1, K Dornbusch 1
PMCID: PMC175903  PMID: 3263831

Abstract

A total of 601 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae isolated in six different regions of Sweden were tested for chloramphenicol susceptibility by using agar dilution MIC determinations and disk diffusion tests. For seven strains MICs were 4 micrograms/ml or higher, and for one strain the MIC was 2 micrograms/ml. All eight strains produced chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. For the remaining 593 strains, MICs were less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml, and the MICs for 50% and 90% of the strains were both 0.5 microgram/ml. Disk diffusion tests carried out by using revised interpretive criteria introduced in 1984 by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics correctly identified the 593 strains as susceptible and the 8 strains as resistant. Quality assessments were performed in 29 clinical microbiology laboratories. The revised criteria for chloramphenicol disk diffusion testing gave rise to false resistance results in some laboratories. The interpretive accuracy improved when the interlaboratory variation was compensated for by using adjusted breakpoints. Such revision was possible through peak correction, single-strain regression analysis, and standard curve regression analysis. Peak-corrected breakpoints improved the accuracy from an overall incidence of false-resistant isolates of 4.4% to 2.3%. Single-strain regression analysis and standard curve regression analysis provided laboratory- and species-specific breakpoints which reduced false resistance rates of 0.14% and 0%, respectively.

Full text

PDF
1484

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A revised system for antibiotic sensitivity testing. The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics. Scand J Infect Dis. 1981;13(2):148–152. doi: 10.3109/inf.1981.13.issue-2.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson B. A., Lorian V. Antimicrobial agent susceptibility patterns of bacteria in hospitals from 1971 to 1982. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):791–796. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.791-796.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azemun P., Stull T., Roberts M., Smith A. L. Rapid detection of chloramphenicol resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Aug;20(2):168–170. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry A. L., Gavan T. L., Jones R. N. Quality control parameters for susceptibility tests with 30-micrograms netilmicin disks. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1051–1054. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1051-1054.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barry A. L., Miller G. H., Hare R. S., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C. Modification of interpretive breakpoints for netilmicin disk susceptibility tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):311–314. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.3.311-314.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doern G. V., Daum G. S., Tubert T. A. In vitro chloramphenicol susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: disk diffusion procedures and assays for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Aug;25(8):1453–1455. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1453-1455.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doern G. V., Jorgensen J. H., Thornsberry C., Preston D. A. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: a collaborative study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Feb;4(2):95–107. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90143-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dowling J. N., McDevitt D. A., Pasculle A. W. Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of members of the family Legionellaceae including erythromycin-resistant variants of Legionella micdadei. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):723–729. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.723-729.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ERICSSON H., TUNEVALL G., WICKMAN K. The paper disc method for determination of bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics. Relationship between the diameter of the zone of inhibition and the minimum inhibitory concentration. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1960;12(4):414–422. doi: 10.3109/00365516009065406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Forsberg P., Petersson A. C., Kronvall G. Determination of species- and laboratory-related interpretive breakpoints for doxycycline susceptibility testing using single-strain regression analysis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1985 Feb;93(1):53–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forsgren A., Walder M. Haemophilus influenzae, Pneumococci, group A streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus: sensitivity of outpatient strains to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Scand J Infect Dis. 1982;14(1):39–43. doi: 10.3109/inf.1982.14.issue-1.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furtado G. L., Medeiros A. A. Single-disk diffusion testing (Kirby-Bauer) of susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to chloramphenicol: significance of the intermediate category. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):550–553. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.550-553.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gavan T. L., Jones R. N., Barry A. L., Fuchs P. C., Gerlach E. H., Matsen J. M., Reller L. B., Thornsberry C., Thrupp L. D. Quality control limits for ampicillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin disk diffusion susceptibility tests: a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jul;14(1):67–72. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.1.67-72.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard A. J., Williams H. M., Poole M. C. Chloramphenicol resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Lancet. 1986 Sep 27;2(8509):745–746. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huovinen P., Herva E., Katila M. L., Klossner M. L., Renkonen O. V., Toivanen P. Reliability of a disk diffusion method using semiconfluent growth in the determination of aminoglycoside resistance. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1986 Jun;94(3):153–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones R. N., Barry A. L., Fuchs P. C., Thornsberry C. Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of two macrolide antimicrobial agents: revised interpretive criteria for erythromycin and preliminary guidelines for roxithromycin (RU 965). J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Aug;24(2):233–239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.2.233-239.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones R. N., Edson D. C. Interlaboratory performance of disk agar diffusion and dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests, 1979-1981. A summary of the microbiology portion of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4 Suppl):651–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Knowles R. C., Moore T. D. Quality control of agar diffusion susceptibility tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Aug;72(2 Suppl):365–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kronvall G. Analysis of a single reference strain for determination of gentamicin regression line constants and inhibition zone diameter breakpoints in quality control of disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Nov;16(5):784–793. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.5.784-793.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsen J. M., Lund M. E., Brooker D. C. Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Jun;5(6):599–606. doi: 10.1128/aac.5.6.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendelman P. M., Chaffin D. O., Clausen C., Stull T. L., Needham C., Williams J. D., Smith A. L. Failure to detect ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae by standard disk susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Aug;30(2):274–280. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.2.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Brien T. F., Kent R. L., Medeiros A. A. Computer-generated plots of results of antimicrobial-susceptibility tests. JAMA. 1969 Oct 6;210(1):84–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramos O. M., Cepero A. E., Resnick T. J. Failure to detect chloramphenicol-resistant Haemophilus influenzae by routine susceptibility testing. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Apr;6(4):420–421. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198704000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ringertz S., Kronvall G. On the theory of the disk diffusion test. Evidence for a non-linear relationship between critical concentration and MIC, and its practical implications for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae. APMIS. 1988 Jun;96(6):484–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Snell J. J., Brown D. F., Phua T. J. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: trial organised as part of United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme for microbiology. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Sep;39(9):1006–1012. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.9.1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Swenson J. M., Hill B. C., Thornsberry C. Screening pneumococci for penicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):749–752. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.749-752.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tardio J. L., Westhoff D. Suitability of the ASM-2 standard test of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for evaluation of antimicrobial disk potency. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):783–788. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.783-788.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vanhoof R., Dierickx R., Coignau H., Hubrechts J. M., Kaufman L., Butzler J. P. Disk sensitivity testing for Campylobacter jejuni. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;3(2):160–162. doi: 10.1007/BF02014342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiedemann B., Machka K., Malottke R. Multicenter study of the sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial agents. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;4(2):229–230. doi: 10.1007/BF02013604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zackrisson G., Brorson J. E. Antibiotic sensitivity of Haemophilus influenzae strains including three recent chloramphenicol-resistant isolates. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1980 Aug;88(4):193–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1980.tb02628.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES