Abstract
Objective: Since market liberalisation in 1987, the Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau (TTWMB) annual statistics indicate that both the demand for imported cigarettes as well as the number of seized smuggled packs have increased with an average revenue loss of NT$4942 million over the past 15 years. The NT$10 average increase in cigarette prices after Taiwan entered the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the implementation of the Tobacco and Alcohol Tax Law in 2002 are forcing policy makers to examine smuggling even more closely. This study evaluates factors that affect an individual smoker's decision to purchase smuggled cigarettes, particularly when faced with higher prices.
Design: 437 male smokers of imported cigarettes were drawn from a national interview survey on cigarette consumption, which the Division of Health Policy Research at the National Health Research Institutes conducted during the year 2000. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyse the behaviour of purchasing smuggled cigarettes with respect to demographic factors, economic factors, smoking behaviour, and other variables.
Results: Cigarette price was the driving factor most closely linked to the purchase of smuggled cigarettes—a 1% increase in cigarette price raised the likelihood of purchasing smuggled cigarettes at least 2.60 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 6.26). Smokers who spent more than NT$1000/month on cigarettes were twice as likely to purchase smuggled cigarettes as those who spent less than NT$1000 (odds ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.70). Betel nut chewers were more likely to purchase smuggled cigarettes (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.90). Smokers who opposed cigarette taxation policy were 1.69 times more likely to buy smuggled cigarettes. Personal income was not significantly associated with smuggled cigarettes purchases.
Conclusions: This study evaluates what causes smokers to purchase smuggled cigarettes. We have determined that cigarette price is the most important factor and that betel nut vendors are the main suppliers. Our study provides policy makers with information that can help them develop effective strategies to curb cigarette smuggling after Taiwan's recent cigarette tax reform, which has increased cigarette prices.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Biener L., Aseltine R. H., Jr, Cohen B., Anderka M. Reactions of adult and teenaged smokers to the Massachusetts tobacco tax. Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep;88(9):1389–1391. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flewelling R. L., Kenney E., Elder J. P., Pierce J., Johnson M., Bal D. G. First-year impact of the 1989 California cigarette tax increase on cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jun;82(6):867–869. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.6.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galbraith J. W., Kaiserman M. Taxation, smuggling and demand for cigarettes in Canada: evidence from time-series data. J Health Econ. 1997 Jun;16(3):287–301. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00525-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu T. W., Bai J., Keeler T. E., Barnett P. G., Sung H. Y. The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption. J Public Health Policy. 1994 Spring;15(1):26–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu T. W., Sung H. Y., Keeler T. E. Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1218–1222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu T. Cigarette taxation in China: lessons from international experiences. Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):136–140. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joossens L., Raw M. Cigarette smuggling in Europe: who really benefits? Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):66–71. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joossens L., Raw M. How can cigarette smuggling be reduced? BMJ. 2000 Oct 14;321(7266):947–950. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7266.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeler T. E., Hu T. W., Barnett P. G., Manning W. G. Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence. J Health Econ. 1993 Apr;12(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90037-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pederson L. L., Bull S. B., Ashley M. J., Lefcoe N. M. A population survey on legislative measures to restrict smoking in Ontario: 2. Knowledge, attitudes, and predicted behavior. Am J Prev Med. 1986 Nov-Dec;2(6):316–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson D. E., Zeger S. L., Remington P. L., Anderson H. A. The effect of state cigarette tax increases on cigarette sales, 1955 to 1988. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jan;82(1):94–96. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]