Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 1999 Dec;8(4):373–377. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.4.373

Sex and race differences in young people's responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies

F Chaloupka 1, R L Pacula 1
PMCID: PMC1759747  PMID: 10629242

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine if there are differences in young people's responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies for population subgroups and to examine whether or not these differences, if they exist, can explain sex and racial differences in trends in the prevalence of smoking in young people in the United States.
DESIGN—Use cross-sectional and intertemporal variation in local and state tobacco control policies and prices to calculate demand responses to these policies using regression analysis techniques.
SUBJECTS—A nationally representative sample of American eighth grade (ages 13-14 years), 10th grade (15-16 years) and 12th grade (17-18 years) students obtained from the 1992-1994 Monitoring the Future surveys.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE—Thirty-day smoking prevalence.
RESULTS—Young men are much more responsive to changes in the price of cigarettes than young women. The prevalence elasticity for young men is almost twice as large as that for young women. Smoking rates of young black men are significantly more responsive to changes in price than young white men. Significant differences in responsiveness to particular tobacco control policies also exist. These differences, however, explain relatively little of the differences in smoking prevalence among young population subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS—Policymakers need to keep in mind that there is not a "one-size fits all" strategy for discouraging smoking among young people.


Keywords: adolescents; tobacco control policies; price; sex differences; racial differences

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Butler J. A., Trezona T. P., Nordestgaard A., State D. Hepatic artery versus portal vein and systemic infusion of fluorodeoxyuridine of rabbit VX-2 hepatic implants. Am J Surg. 1989 Jan;157(1):126–129. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90432-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jason L. A., Ji P. Y., Anes M. D., Birkhead S. H. Active enforcement of cigarette control laws in the prevention of cigarette sales to minors. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3159–3161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wasserman J., Manning W. G., Newhouse J. P., Winkler J. D. The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking. J Health Econ. 1991 May;10(1):43–64. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90016-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES