Abstract
Aims—(1) To establish whether gastroenterologists wish to train in abdominal ultrasound according to the Royal College of Radiologists' document, Guidance for the training in ultrasound of medical non-radiologists. (2) To determine whether the ultrasound workload generated by gastroenterologists differs from that by other clinicians. Methods—A postal questionnaire was sent to all 278gastroenterology trainees. The indications and findings of 100consecutive gastroenterologist requested scans were compared with 100 scans requested sequentially by other clinicians through a teaching hospital radiology department. Results—82% of the survey forms were returned. 77% of trainees wished to train in abdominal ultrasound and 68% were prepared to train in the manner outlined in the guideline document. However, 86% felt that they would ideally prefer not to assess renal or pelvic pathology, restricting to hepatobiliary diagnosis only. 73% of trainees did not anticipate that a further scan by a radiologist would be required. Comparison of gastroenterology scans with those requested by other clinicians revealed a relative excess of hepatobiliary indications and findings, and a notable paucity of renal and pelvic pathology in gastroenterology practice. Conclusions—There is general interest in abdominal ultrasound training among gastroenterology trainees and broad acceptance of the guideline document. However, most trainees perceive a focus of training restricted to hepatobiliary disease to be most appropriate. The case mix study provides support for this viewpoint. It is suggested that a more focused ultrasound training for gastroenterologists be considered.
Keywords: gastroenterology; training; ultrasound
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bartram C. I. Ultrasound training for non-radiologists. Clin Radiol. 1996 Jun;51(6):449–450. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilmore I. T., Burroughs A., Murray-Lyon I. M., Williams R., Jenkins D., Hopkins A. Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut. 1995 Mar;36(3):437–441. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.3.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin D. F. Ultrasound for gastroenterologists. Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):479–480. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.4.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin D. F. Ultrasound training for non-radiologists. Clin Radiol. 1995 Sep;50(9):589–592. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83285-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. A., Scammon D. L., Beck S. L. Using patient focus groups for new patient services. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Jan;21(1):22–31. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vesey S. G., Lumb G. N., O'Boyle P. J. An evaluation of urologist-operated ultrasound and its use in the urological out-patient clinic. Br J Urol. 1988 Jan;61(1):74–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb09166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waghorn A., McKee M., Thompson J. Surgical outpatients: challenges and responses. Br J Surg. 1997 Mar;84(3):300–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]