Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Nov;82(5):575–580. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.5.575

Left ventricular beat to beat performance in atrial fibrillation: dependence on contractility, preload, and afterload

H Muntinga 1, A Gosselink 1, P Blanksma 1, P J De Kam 1, E Wall 1, H Crijns 1
PMCID: PMC1760769  PMID: 10525512

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To assess independent determinants of beat to beat variation in left ventricular performance during atrial fibrillation.
DESIGN—Prospective study.
SETTING—University hospital.
PATIENTS—Seven patients with chronic non-valvar atrial fibrillation.
INTERVENTIONS—Invasive and non-invasive haemodynamic variables were assessed using a non-imaging computerised nuclear probe, a balloon tipped flow directed catheter, and a non-invasive fingertip blood pressure measurement system linked to a personal computer.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volume, ventricular cycle length, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and measures of left ventricular afterload (end systolic pressure/stroke volume) and contractility (end systolic pressure/end systolic volume) were calculated on a beat to beat basis during 500 consecutive RR intervals. A statistical model of the beat to beat variation of the ejection fraction containing these variables was constructed by multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS—Positive independent relations with ejection fraction were found for preceding RR interval, contractility, and end diastolic volume, while inverse relations were found for afterload, preceding end systolic volume, and preceding contractility (all variables, p < 0.0001). A relatively strong interaction was found between end diastolic volume and afterload, indicating that ejection fraction was relatively more enhanced by preload in the presence of low afterload.
CONCLUSIONS—The varying left ventricular systolic performance during atrial fibrillation is independently influenced by beat to beat variation in cycle length, preload, afterload, and contractility. Beat to beat variation in preload shows its effect on ventricular performance mainly in the presence of a low afterload.


Keywords: atrial fibrillation; contractility; haemodynamic variables

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.4 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Schematic drawing showing the relation between the QRS complex on the ECG, the definition of the index interval, preceding and pre-preceding interval (pRR and ppRR, respectively), and the timing of the volume and pressure measurements. During the index interval, EDV (end diastolic volume), ESP (end systolic pressure), and ESV (end systolic volume) were measured. During the preceding interval, pEDV, pESP, and pESV (indicating preceding EDV, ESP, and ESV, respectively), and during the pre-preceding interval ppEDV, ppESP, and ppESV (indicating pre-preceding EDV, ESP, and ESV, respectively) were measured.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Positive relation between preceding RR interval and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction in one of the patients. There is a curvilinear relation with ejection fraction, remaining rather constant at long RR intervals.

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Positive relation between left ventricular (LV) end diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction in the same patient as in fig 2.

Figure 4  .

Figure 4  

Open in a new tab

Example of the positive relation between left ventricular (LV) contractility of the index cycle (ESP/ESV indicates the ratio of end systolic pressure and end systolic volume) and LV ejection fraction in the same patient as in fig 2.

Figure 5  .

Figure 5  

Open in a new tab

Example of the negative relation between left ventricular (LV) afterload of the index cycle (ESP/SV indicates the ratio of end systolic pressure and stroke volume) and LV ejection fraction.

Figure 6  .

Figure 6  

Open in a new tab

Effect of the interaction between left ventricular (LV) afterload (ESP/SV indicates the ratio of end systolic pressure and stroke volume) and LV end diastolic volume (EDV) on LV ejection fraction. The curves are based on the multiple regression model. All other variables were fixed on their mean value. With rising afterload, ejection fraction decreases. The interaction shows that with low afterload, the effect of end diastolic volume on the ejection fraction is relatively large, whereas with high afterload the ejection fraction was relatively less influenced by end diastolic volume.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berger H. J., Davies R. A., Batsford W. P., Hoffer P. B., Gottschalk A., Zaret B. L. Beat-to-beat left ventricular performance assessed from the equilibrium cardiac blood pool using a computerized nuclear probe. Circulation. 1981 Jan;63(1):133–142. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.1.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bootsma B. K., Hoelsen A. J., Strackee J., Meijler F. L. Analysis of R-R intervals in patients with atrial fibrillation at rest and during exercise. Circulation. 1970 May;41(5):783–794. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.5.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braunwald E., Frye R. L., Aygen M. M., Gilbert J. W. STUDIES ON STARLING'S LAW OF THE HEART. III. OBSERVATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH MITRAL STENOSIS AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEFT VENTRICULAR END-DIASTOLIC SEGMENT LENGTH, FILLING PRESSURE, AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF VENTRICULAR CONTRACTION. J Clin Invest. 1960 Dec;39(12):1874–1884. doi: 10.1172/JCI104211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark D. M., Plumb V. J., Epstein A. E., Kay G. N. Hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Oct;30(4):1039–1045. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daoud E. G., Weiss R., Bahu M., Knight B. P., Bogun F., Goyal R., Harvey M., Strickberger S. A., Man K. C., Morady F. Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 15;78(12):1433–1436. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89297-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edmands R. E., Greenspan K., Fisch C. The role of inotropic variation in ventricular function during atrial fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 1970 Apr;49(4):738–746. doi: 10.1172/JCI106286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson J. J. American College of Cardiology 45th Annual Scientific Session, Orlando, Florida, March 24 to 27, 1996. Circulation. 1996 Jul 1;94(1):1–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson D. G., Broder G., Sowton E. Effect of varying pulse interval in atrial fibrillation on left ventricular function in man. Br Heart J. 1971 May;33(3):388–393. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.3.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gosselink A. T., Blanksma P. K., Crijns H. J., Van Gelder I. C., de Kam P. J., Hillege H. L., Niemeijer M. G., Lie K. I., Meijler F. L. Left ventricular beat-to-beat performance in atrial fibrillation: contribution of Frank-Starling mechanism after short rather than long RR intervals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 15;26(6):1516–1521. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00340-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hardman S. M., Noble M. I., Seed W. A. Postextrasystolic potentiation and its contribution to the beat-to-beat variation of the pulse during atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1992 Oct;86(4):1223–1232. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.4.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunter W. C. End-systolic pressure as a balance between opposing effects of ejection. Circ Res. 1989 Feb;64(2):265–275. doi: 10.1161/01.res.64.2.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Imholz B. P., Wieling W., Langewouters G. J., van Montfrans G. A. Continuous finger arterial pressure: utility in the cardiovascular laboratory. Clin Auton Res. 1991 Mar;1(1):43–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01826057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karliner J. S., Gault J. H., Bouchard R. J., Holzer J. Factors influencing the ejection fraction and the mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening during atrial fibrillation in man. Cardiovasc Res. 1974 Jan;8(1):18–25. doi: 10.1093/cvr/8.1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meijler F. L., Strackee J., Van Capelle J. L., Du Perron J. C. Computer analysis of the RR interval-contractility relationship during random stimulation of the isolated heart. Circ Res. 1968 May;22(5):695–702. doi: 10.1161/01.res.22.5.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Natale A., Zimerman L., Tomassoni G., Kearney M., Kent V., Brandon M. J., Newby K. Impact on ventricular function and quality of life of transcatheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction in chronic atrial fibrillation with a normal ventricular response. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 15;78(12):1431–1433. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89296-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Omboni S., Parati G., Frattola A., Mutti E., Di Rienzo M., Castiglioni P., Mancia G. Spectral and sequence analysis of finger blood pressure variability. Comparison with analysis of intra-arterial recordings. Hypertension. 1993 Jul;22(1):26–33. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.22.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schneider J., Berger H. J., Sands M. J., Lachman A. B., Zaret B. L. Beat-to-beat left ventricular performance in atrial fibrillation: radionuclide assessment with the computerized nuclear probe. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Apr;51(7):1189–1195. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90367-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Seed W. A., Walker J. M. Review: Relation between beat interval and force of the heartbeat and its clinical implications. Cardiovasc Res. 1988 May;22(5):303–314. doi: 10.1093/cvr/22.5.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Slinker B. K. Cardiac cycle length modulates cardiovascular regulation that is dependent on previous beat contraction history. Circ Res. 1991 Jul;69(1):2–11. doi: 10.1161/01.res.69.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Slinker B. K., Shroff S. G., Kirkpatrick R. D., Campbell K. B. Left ventricular function depends on previous beat ejection but not previous beat pressure load. Circ Res. 1991 Oct;69(4):1051–1057. doi: 10.1161/01.res.69.4.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Suga H., Sagawa K. Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1974 Jul;35(1):117–126. doi: 10.1161/01.res.35.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Suga H., Sagawa K., Shoukas A. A. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res. 1973 Mar;32(3):314–322. doi: 10.1161/01.res.32.3.314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sunagawa K., Maughan W. L., Burkhoff D., Sagawa K. Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1983 Nov;245(5 Pt 1):H773–H780. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.5.H773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Gelder I. C., Crijns H. J., Blanksma P. K., Landsman M. L., Posma J. L., Van Den Berg M. P., Meijler F. L., Lie K. I. Time course of hemodynamic changes and improvement of exercise tolerance after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation unassociated with cardiac valve disease. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Sep 1;72(7):560–566. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90352-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wagner H. N., Wake R., Nickoloff E., Natarajan T. K. The nuclear stethoscope: a simple device for generation of left ventricular volume curves. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Nov 23;38(6):747–750. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90352-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES