Skip to main content
PMC home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 2000 Jun;83(6):641–644. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.6.641

Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease

M Dempster 1, M Donnelly 1
PMCID: PMC1760881  PMID: 10814620

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To inform researchers and clinicians about the most appropriate generic and disease specific measures of health related quality of life for use among people with ischaemic heart disease.
METHODS—MEDLINE and BIDS were searched for research papers which contained a report of at least one of the three most common generic instruments or at least one of the five disease specific instruments used with ischaemic heart disease patients. Evidence for the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of these instruments was critically appraised.
RESULTS—Of the three generic measures—the Nottingham health profile, sickness impact profile, and short form 36 (SF-36)—the SF-36 appears to offer the most reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment of quality of life. However, a few of the SF-36 subscales lack a sufficient degree of sensitivity to detect change in a patient's clinical condition. According to the best available evidence, the quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire should be preferred to the Seattle angina questionnaire, the quality of life index cardiac version, the angina pectoris quality of life questionnaire, and the summary index. Overall, research on disease specific measures is sparse compared to the number of studies which have investigated generic measures.
CONCLUSIONS—An assessment of the quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease should comprise a disease specific measure in addition to a generic measure. The SF-36 and the quality of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire (version 2) are the most appropriate currently available generic and disease specific measures of health related quality of life, respectively. Further research into the measurement of health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease is required in order to address the problems (such as lack of sensitivity to detect change) identified by the review.


Keywords: quality of life; outcome measurement; ischaemic heart disease

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avis N. E., Smith K. W., Hambleton R. K., Feldman H. A., Selwyn A., Jacobs A. Development of the multidimensional index of life quality. A quality of life measure for cardiovascular disease. Med Care. 1996 Nov;34(11):1102–1120. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199611000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Pollard W. E., Martin D. P., Gilson B. S. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):57–67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty C. M., Dewhurst T., Nichol W. P., Spertus J. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):569–575. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00028-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferrans C. E., Powers M. J. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1985 Oct;8(1):15–24. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198510000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fletcher A. E., Bulpitt C. J. Measurement of quality of life in clinical trials of therapy. Cardiology. 1988;75 (Suppl 1):41–52. doi: 10.1159/000174444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hillers T. K., Guyatt G. H., Oldridge N., Crowe J., Willan A., Griffith L., Feeny D. Quality of life after myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1287–1296. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90134-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Backett E. M., Williams J., Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lim L. L., Valenti L. A., Knapp J. C., Dobson A. J., Plotnikoff R., Higginbotham N., Heller R. F. A self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Nov;46(11):1249–1256. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90089-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayou R. Quality of life in cardiovascular disease. Psychother Psychosom. 1990;54(2-3):99–109. doi: 10.1159/000288384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oldridge N., Guyatt G., Jones N., Crowe J., Singer J., Feeny D., McKelvie R., Runions J., Streiner D., Torrance G. Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 15;67(13):1084–1089. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90870-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Spertus J. A., Winder J. A., Dewhurst T. A., Deyo R. A., Prodzinski J., McDonell M., Fihn S. D. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):333–341. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taylor R., Kirby B., Burdon D., Caves R. The assessment of recovery in patients after myocardial infarction using three generic quality-of-life measures. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;18(2):139–144. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199803000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tullis D. E., Guyatt G. H. Quality of life in cystic fibrosis. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jul;8(1):23–33. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Valenti L., Lim L., Heller R. F., Knapp J. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):151–161. doi: 10.1007/BF00435980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Visser M. C., Fletcher A. E., Parr G., Simpson A., Bulpitt C. J. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: the Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile, and the Quality of Well Being Scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;47(2):157–163. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Visser M. C., Koudstaal P. J., Erdman R. A., Deckers J. W., Passchier J., van Gijn J., Grobbee D. E. Measuring quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke: a feasibility study of four questionnaires in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Oct;49(5):513–517. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.5.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wiklund I., Comerford M. B., Dimenäs E. The relationship between exercise tolerance and quality of life in angina pectoris. Clin Cardiol. 1991 Mar;14(3):204–208. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960140306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilson A., Wiklund I., Lahti T., Wahl M. A summary index for the assessment of quality of life in angina pectoris. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(9):981–988. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90069-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Background article on quality of life instruments]
heart_83_6_641__index.html (36.7KB, html)

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES