Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1984 Sep;26(3):417–418. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.3.417

Comparative in vitro activities of enoxacin (CI-919, AT-2266) and eleven antipseudomonal agents against aminoglycoside-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

C M Bassey, A L Baltch, R P Smith, P E Conley
PMCID: PMC176183  PMID: 6439116

Abstract

The in vitro activity of enoxacin (CI 919, AT 2266), a new oral quinolone carboxylic acid compound, was compared with those of gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, azlocillin, piperacillin, aztreonam, moxalactam, imipenem, cefsulodin, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone against 101 aminoglycoside-susceptible and 105 aminoglycoside-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Among these 206 P. aeruginosa isolates were 25 strains with known mechanisms of resistance to amikacin. The activity of enoxacin was similar to that of tobramycin against aminoglycoside-susceptible strains, with MICs of 1.0 to 2.0 micrograms/ml and 0.5 to 1.0 microgram/ml, respectively, for 90% of the strains. Enoxacin was the most active agent in this in vitro study against aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa strains, with MICs of 2.0 to 4.0 micrograms/ml for 90% of the strains. Strains with enzymatic resistance to amikacin were more resistant to beta-lactams (except enoxacin and imipenem) than were strains with decreased permeability.

Full text

PDF
417

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baltch A. L., Griffin P. E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a clinical study of 75 patients. Am J Med Sci. 1977 Sep-Oct;274(2):119–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baltch A. L., Hammer M., Smith R. P., Sutphen N. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: susceptibility of 100 blood culture isolates to seven antimicrobial agents and its clinical significance. J Lab Clin Med. 1979 Aug;94(2):201–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chartrand S. A., Scribner R. K., Weber A. H., Welch D. F., Marks M. I. In vitro activity of CI-919 (AT-2266), an oral antipseudomonal compound. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 May;23(5):658–663. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.5.658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chin N. X., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of enoxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid, compared with those of norfloxacin, new beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Nov;24(5):754–763. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.5.754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kouno K., Inoue M., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of AT-2266. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jul;24(1):78–84. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nakamura S., Kurobe N., Kashimoto S., Ohue T., Takase Y., Shimizu M. Pharmacokinetics of AT-2266 administered orally to mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jul;24(1):54–60. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakamura S., Minami A., Katae H., Inoue S., Yamagishi J., Takase Y., Shimizu M. In vitro antibacterial properties of AT-2266, a new pyridonecarboxylic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 May;23(5):641–648. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.5.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakamura S., Nakata K., Katae H., Minami A., Kashimoto S., Yamagishi J., Takase Y., Shimizu M. Activity of AT-2266 compared with those of norfloxacin, pipemidic acid, nalidixic acid, and gentamicin against various experimental infections in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 May;23(5):742–749. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.5.742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES